An empirical investigation found that the dimensions of moral intensity were related to the recognition of moral issues, moral evaluations (i.e., utilitarian, deontological, procedural, and distributive justice), and moral intentions. Consistent with the ethical decision-making framework presented, findings also revealed that (a) the moral intensity–moral evaluation relation was partially mediated by moral recognition for distributive justice and utilitarian evaluations, (b) the moral recognition–moral intention relationwas fully mediated by distributive justice and utilitarian evaluations, and (c) the moral intensity–moral intention relation was partially mediated by the combination of moral recognition and each ofthe moral evaluation processes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ajzen, I.
(1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
2.
Baron, R. M.
,& Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3.
Boldero, J.
(1995). The prediction of household recycling of newspapers: The role ofattitudes, intentions, and situational factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 440-462.
4.
Brady, F. N.
(1985). A Janus-headed model of ethical theory: Looking two ways at business/society issues. Academy of Management Review, 10, 568-576.
5.
Brady, F. N.
,& Wheeler, G. E. (1996). An empirical study of ethical predispositions. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 927-940.
6.
Cavanagh, G. F.
, & Fritzsche, D. J. (1985). Using vignettes in business ethics research. In L. E. Preston (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy(Vol. 7, pp. 279-293). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
7.
Cavanagh, G. F.
, Moberg, D. J., & Velasquez, M. (1981). The ethics of or ganizational politics. Academy of Management Review, 6, 363-374.
8.
Cole, J.
(1999, October). Fibbers beware: Misleading job recruitment. HR Focus, p. S6-S6.
9.
Davis, M. A.
, Johnson, N. B., & Ohmer, D. G. (1998). Issue-contingent effects on ethical decision making: Across-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 373-389.
10.
De George, R. T.
(1999). Business ethics(5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11.
Deutsch, M.
(1985). Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
Dubinsky, A. J.
,& Loken, B. (1989). Analyzing ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 19, 83-107.
13.
Dukerich, J. M.
, Waller, M. J., George, E.,& Huber, G. P. (2000). Moral intensity and managerial problem solving. Journal of Business Ethics, 24, 29-38.
14.
Ferrell, O. C.
,& Gresham, L. G. (1985). Acontingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49, 87-96.
15.
Ferrell, O. C.
, Gresham, L. G.,& Fraedrich, J. (1989). Asynthesis of ethical decision models for marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 9(2), 55-64.
16.
Fishbein, M.
,& Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intentions and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
17.
Flannery, B. L.
, & May, D. R. (2000). Environmental ethical decision making in the U.S. metal finishing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 642-662.
18.
Flynn, B. S.
, Dana, G. S., Goldstein, A. O., Bauman, K. E., Cohen, J. E., Gottlieb, N. H., Solomon, L. J.,& Munger, M. C. (1997). State legislators’intentions to vote and subsequent votes on tobacco control legislation. Health Psychology, 16, 401-404.
19.
Ford, R. C.
,& Richardson, W. D. (1994). Ethical decision making: Areview of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 205-221.
20.
Fox, J.
(1991). Regression diagnostics: Qualitative applications in the social sciences series. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Frey, B. F.
(2000). The impact of moral intensity on decision making in a business context. Journal of Business Ethics, 26, 181-195.
22.
Fritzsche, D. J.
, & Becker, H. (1984). Linking management behavior to ethical philosophy — an empirical investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 166-175.
23.
Fusilier, M. R.
, Aby, C. D., Jr., Worley, J. K., & Elliott, S. (1996). Perceived seriousness of business ethics issues. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 15, 67-78.
24.
Gautschi, F. H.
, & Jones, T. M. (1998). Enhancing the ability of business students to recognize ethical issues: An empirical assessment of the effectiveness ofa course in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 205-216.
25.
Gordon, M. E.
,& Lee, B. A. (1990). Property rights in jobs: Workforce, behavioral, and legal perspectives. In G. Ferris (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management(Vol. 8, pp. 303-348). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
26.
Hansen, R. S.
(1992). A multidimensional scale for measuring business ethics: A purification and refinement. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 523-534.
27.
Harrington, S. J.
(1997). A test of a person-issue contingent model of ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 363-375.
28.
Hunt, S.
(1990). Commentary on an empirical investigation of a general theory ofmark eting ethics. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18, 173-177.
29.
Hunt, S.
& Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of mark eting ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5-16.
30.
Jalajas, D. S.
(1993). Ethical decision making in college students: A test of Jones’ moral intensity concept. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Academy of Management, Providence, RI.
31.
Jones, T. M.
(1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366-395.
32.
Jones, T. M.
, & Huber, V. L. (1992). Issue-contingency in ethical decision making. International Association for Business and Society Proceedings, pp. 156-166.
33.
Kant, I.
(1965). The metaphysical elements of justice. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. (Original work published in 1797)
34.
Kohlberg, L.
(1981). The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco: Harper& Row.
35.
Leone, L.
, Perugini, M., & Ercolani, A. (1999). A comparison of three models ofattitude-behavior relationships in the studying behavior domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2-3), 161-189.
36.
Lind, E. A.
,& Lissak, R. I. (1985). Apparent impropriety and procedural fairness judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 19-29.
37.
Lind, E. A.
, & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
38.
Lysonski, S.
,& Gaidis, W. (1991). Across-cultural comparison of the ethics ofb usiness students. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 141-151.
39.
Marshall, B.
& Dewe, P. (1997). An investigation of the components ofmoral intensity. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 521-530.
40.
Mayo, M. A.
, & Marks, L. J. (1990). An empirical investigation of a general theory ofmarketing ethics. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18, 163-171.
41.
McFarlin, D. B.
, & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626-637.
42.
Mischel, W.
(1968). Personality and assessment. New York: John Wiley.
43.
Morris, S. A.
, & McDonald, R. A. (1995). The role of moral intensity in moral judgments: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 715-726.
44.
Nisbett, R.
, & Ross, L. (1980). Human interface: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
45.
Nunnally, J. C.
(1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
46.
Premeaux, S. R.
,& Mondy, R. W. (1993). Linking management behavior to ethical philosophy. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 349-357.
47.
Randall, D. M.
,& Gibson, A. M. (1990). Methodology in business ethics research: Areview and critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 457-471.
48.
Rawls, J.
(1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
Reidenbach, R. E.
,& Robin, D. P. (1988). Some initial steps toward improving the measurement of ethical evaluations ofmark eting activities. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 871-879.
50.
Reidenbach, R. E.
, & Robin, D. P. (1990). Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 639-653.
51.
Reidenbach, R. E.
, & Robin, D. P. (1993). A comment on “a multi-dimensional scale for measuring business ethics: A purification and refinement.”Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 663-664.
52.
Rest, J. R.
(1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.
53.
Schaubroeck, J.
, May, D. R., & Brown, F. W. (1994). Procedural justice explanations and employee reactions to economic hardship: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 455-460.
54.
Schminke, M.
, Ambrose, M. L., & Noel, T. W. (1997). The effects of ethical frameworks on perceptions of or ganizational justice. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1190-1207.
55.
Schulman, M.
(1998, Spring/Summer). Little Brother is watching you. Issues in Ethics, pp. 11-15.
56.
Schwoerer, C. E.
, May, D. R., & Rosen, B. (1995). Organizational characteristics and HRM policies on rights: Exploring the connections. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 531-549.
57.
Singer, M. S.
(1996). The role of moral intensity and fairness perception in judgments of ethicality: A comparison ofmanagerial professionals and the general public. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 469-475.
58.
Singer, M.
, Mitchell, S., & Turner, J. (1998). Consideration of moral intensity in ethicality judgments: Its relationship with whistleblowing and need-for-cognition. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 527-541.
59.
Singer, M. S.
, & Singer, A. E. (1997). Observer judgments about moral agents’ ethical decisions: The role of scope ofjustice and moral intensity. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 473-484.
60.
Singhapakdi, A.
, Vitell, S. J., & Kraft, K. L. (1996). Moral intensity and ethical decision making of mark eting professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36, 245-255.
61.
Stewart, W. H.
, Ledgerwood, D. E., & May, R. C. (1996). Educating business schools about safety and health is no accident. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 919-926.
62.
Taylor, S.
, & Todd, P. (1997). Understanding the determinants of consumer composting behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 602-628.
63.
Thibaut, J.
, & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64.
Trevino, L. K.
(1986). Ethical decision-making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601-617.
65.
Trevino, L. K.
(1992). Moral reasoning and business ethics: Implications for research, education, and management. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 445-459.
66.
Trevino, L. K.
, & Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 378-385.
67.
Velasquez, M.
(1988). Business ethics (2nd edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
68.
Vitell, S. J.
,& Hunt, S. D. (1990). The general theory of mark eting ethics: Apartial test ofthe model. In J. N. Sheth (Ed.), Research in marketing(Vol. 10, pp. 237-265). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
69.
Weber, J.
(1990). Managers’ moral reasoning: Assessing their responses to three moral dilemmas. Human Relations, 43, 687-702.
70.
Weber, J.
(1996). Influences upon managerial moral decision making: Nature of the harm and magnitude of consequences. Human Relations, 49, 1-22.
71.
Weber, J.
, & Gillespie, J. (1998). Differences in ethical beliefs, intentions, and behaviors: The role of belief s and intentions in ethics research revisited. Business and Society, 37, 447-467.
