This article draws on Principles of Stakeholder Managementrecently published by the Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics. The article discusses the most important principles and the reasoning behind them. First, though, it lays a foundation for the application of these principles by interpreting a massive empirical study that demonstrates strong parallels between stakeholder valuation of firms (measured as overall reputation) and shareholder valuation (stock market returns). This evidence is coupled with conceptual analysis that shows that the most famous pronouncements of Adam Smith and Milton Friedman actually argue for, not against, the stakeholder approach.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berman, S. L.
, Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 488-506.
2.
Bishop, J. D.
(1995). Adam Smith’s invisible hand argument. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 165-180.
3.
Branch, S.
(1999, January 11). America’s top employers. Fortune, 139, 118-144.
4.
Carroll, A. B.
(1991, July-August). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 39-48.
5.
Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics
. (2000). Principles of stakeholder management. Toronto, Canada: Author [Online]. Available at: http://mgmt.utoronto.caostake/Principles.htm
6.
Colvin, G.
(1999, July 19). The 50 best companies for Asians, Blacks, and Hispanics. Fortune, 140, 52ff-52ff.
7.
Figlewicz, R. E.
,& Szwajkowski, E. (in press). Systematic risk volatility and corporate reputation: A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis. Organization Science Electronic Letters.
8.
Freeman, R. E.
(1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach.Boston: Pitman.
9.
Friedman, M.
(1962). Capitalism and freedom.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Friedman, M.
(1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase profits. New York Times Magazine, 32-32.
11.
Levering, R.
,& Moskowitz, M. (1994). The 100 best companies to work for in America(rev. ed.). New York: Plume.
12.
Rothschild, E.
(1994). Adam Smith and the invisible hand. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 84(2), 319-322.
13.
Schlefer, J.
(1998). Today’s most mischievous misquotation. The Atlantic Monthly, 281(3), 16-19.
14.
Scott, M.
,& Rothman, H. (1994). Companies with a conscience: Intimate portraits of twelve firms that make a difference(rev. ed.). New York: Citadel.
15.
Smith, A.
(1976a). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Oxford, UK: Clarendon. (Original work published 1776)
16.
Smith, A.
(1976b). The theory of moral sentiments. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1790)
17.
Smith, A.
(1993). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (K. Sutherland, Ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1776)
18.
Waddock, S. A.
,& Mahon, J. F. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited: Dimensions of efficacy, effectiveness, and efficiency. In J. E. Post (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy(Vol. 12, pp. 231-262). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
19.
Winch, D.
(1997). Adam Smith’s problems and ours. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 44, 384-402.
20.
Wokutch, R. E.
, & McKinney, E. W. (1991). Behavioral and perceptual measures of corporate social performance. In J. E. Post (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy(Vol. 12, pp. 309-330). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
21.
Young, J. T.
(1997). Economics as a moral science: The political economy of Adam Smith. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elger.
22.
Zeitz, B.
, & Dusky, L. (1989). The best companies for women. New York: Pocket.
