Corporate Citizenship: A Stakeholder Approach for Defining Corporate Social Performance and Identifying Measures for Assessing It

Agle, B. R. ,& Kelley, P. C. (1996). Validity in the measurement of corporate social performance: Lessons from corporate United Way and Pac campaigns. For submission to the SIM division of the Academy of Management (1996 meeting).

Aldag, R. J. , & Bartol, K. M. (1978). Empirical studies of corporate social performance and policy: A survey of problems and results. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 1, 99-122.

Ansoff, I. (1965). Corporate strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.

Carroll, A. B. (1991). Corporate social performance measurement: A commentary on methods for evaluating an elusive construct. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12, 385-401.

Clarkson, M.B.E. (1988). Corporate social performance in Canada, 1976-1986. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 10, 241-266.

Clarkson, M.B.E. (1991). Defining, evaluating, and managing corporate social performance: The stakeholder management model. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12, 331-358.

Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.

Delbecq, A. L. , Van de Ven, A. , & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

Hocevar, S. P. ,& Bhambri, A. (1989). Corporate social performance: Amodel of assessment criteria. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 11, 1-20.

Jones, T. M. (1983). An integrating framework for research in business and society: A step toward the elusive paradigm? Academy of Management Review, 8, 559-564.

Sethi, P. S. (1973). Corporate social audit: An emerging trend in measuring corporate social performance. In D. Votaw & S. Prakash Sethi (Eds.), The corporate dilemma: Traditional values versus contemporary problems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Sethi, S. P. (1979). A conceptual framework for environmental analysis of social issues and evaluation of business response patterns. Academy of Management Review, 4, 63-74.

Ullman, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540-557.

Wartick, S. L. , & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758-769.

Wokutch, R. E. , & Fahey, L. (1986). A value explicit approach for evaluating corporate social performance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 5, 191-214.

Wokutch, R. E. , & McKinney, E. W. (1991). Behavioral and perceptual measures of corporate social performance. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12, 309-330.

Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691-718.

Wood, D. J. , & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(3), 229-267.

Zenisek, T. J. (1979). Corporate social responsibility: A conceptualization based on organizational literature. Academy of Management Review, 4(3), 359-368.