This article draws from theories of business-government relations and Austrian economics to develop a model relating firm performance to the firm’s market and nonmarket actions. Nonmarket actions represent one mechanism for the implementation of firm strategies. The model is tested using an original data set covering airlines serving international routes in the North Atlantic region. Results suggest that nonmarket actions have a positive and significant impact on performance, measured in three ways: profits, market share, and capacity utilization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aplin, J.
,& Hegarty, H. (1980). Political influence: Strategies employed by organizations to impact legislation in business and economic matters. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 438-450.
2.
Aviation Daily. (1988-1994). Various editions.
3.
Baron, D.
(1995). Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California Management Review, 37, 47-65.
4.
Baron, D.
(1997). Integrated strategy, trade policy, and global competition. California Management Review, 39, 145-169.
5.
Boddewyn, J.
, & Brewer, T. (1994). International business political behavior: New theoretical directions. Academy of Management Review, 19, 119-143.
6.
Chen, M. (1988). Competitive strategic interaction: A study of competitive actions and responses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland at College Park.
7.
Cheung, B.
(1985). The law of international air transport. London: Stevens & Sons.
8.
Crandall, R.
(1994). International aviation: Unrealized opportunity. Dallas: American Airlines.
9.
Dempsey, P.
, & Goetz, A. (1992). Airline deregulation and laissez-faire mythology. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
10.
Dresner, M., & Oum, T. (1998). The effect of liberalized air transport bilaterals on foreign trade diversion. Unpublished working paper.
11.
Dresner, M.
, & Xu, K. (1995). Customer service, customer satisfaction, and corporate performance in the private sector. Journal of Business Logistics, 16, 23-40.
12.
Ferrier, W. J.
, Smith, K. G.,& Grimm, C. M. (1999). The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 372-388.
13.
Gale, J.
, & Buchholz, R. (1987). The political pursuit of competitive advantage: What business can gain from government. In A. Marcus, A. Kaufman,& D. Beam (Eds.), Business strategy and public policy: Perspectives from industry and academia (pp. 31-42). New York: Quorum Books.
14.
Greening, D.
, & Gray, B. (1994). Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 467-498.
15.
Griffin, J.
, & Mahon, J. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36, 5-31.
16.
Grimm, C.
, & Smith, K. (1997). Strategy as action: Industry rivalry and coordination. Cincinnati: Southwestern Publishing.
17.
Harris, R. A.
(1989). Politicized management: The changing face of business in American politics. In R. A. Harris & S. M. Milkis (Eds.), Remaking American politics (pp. 261-285). San Francisco: Westview Press.
18.
Hillman, A.
, & Hitt, M. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Academy of Management Review, 24, 825-842.
19.
Hillman, A.
, & Keim, G. (1995). International variation in the business government interface: Some institutional and organizational considerations. Academy of Management Review, 20, 193-214.
20.
Hillman, A.
, Zardkoohi, A., & Bierman, L. (1999). Corporate political strategies and firm performance: Indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the U.S. government. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 67-81.
21.
Jauch, L.
, Osborn, R., & Martin, T. (1980). Structured content analysis of cases: A complementary method of organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 5, 517-526.
22.
Katz, R.
(1988). The impact of computer reservation systems on air transport competition. In Deregulation and airline competition (pp. 85-101). Paris: OECD.
23.
Keim, G.
(1981). Foundations of a political strategy for business. California Management Review, 23, 41-47.
24.
Keim, G.
(1997). Stakeholder theory meets economic value added: Implications for the descriptive and instrumental aspects of stakeholder theory. Paper presented at the 1997 National Meetings of the Academy of Management, Boston.
25.
Keim, G.
, & Baysinger, B. (1988). The efficacy of business-political behavior: Competitive considerations in a principal-agent context. Journal of Management, 14, 163-180.
26.
Kirzner, I.
(1976). On the method of Austrian economics. In E. Dolan (Ed.), The foundations of modern Austrian economics (pp. 40-51). Kansas City: Sheed & Ward.
27.
Lenway, S.
, & Rehbein, K. (1991). Leaders, followers, and free riders: An empirical test of variation in corporate political involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 893-905.
28.
Lenway, S.
, Rehbein, K., & Starks, L. (1990). The impact of protectionism on firm wealth: The experience of the steel industry. Southern Economic Journal, 56, 1079-1093.
29.
Leone, R.
(1986). Who profits?: Winners, losers and government regulation. New York: Basic Books.
30.
Mahon, J.
, & McGowan, R. (1996). Industry as a player in the political and social arena. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
31.
Marsh, S.
(1998). Creating barriers for foreign competitors: A study of the impact of antidumping actions on the performance of U.S. firms. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 25-38.
32.
Mises, L.
(1949). Human action. New Haven: Yale University Press.
33.
Mitnick, B. M.
(1981). The strategic uses of regulation and deregulation. Business Horizons, 24, 71-83.
34.
Nelson, R.
, & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
35.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
. (1988). Deregulation and airline competition. Paris: OECD.
36.
Oster, S. M.
(1982). The strategic use of regulatory investment by industry subgroups. Economic Inquiry, 20, 604-618.
37.
Oum, T.,& Zhang, A. (1995). The effects of airline codesharing agreements on international airline fares. Unpublished working paper.
38.
Perreault, W.
, & Leigh, L. (1989). Reliability measures for qualitative data: Theory and implications. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 135-148.
39.
Porter, M.
(1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.
40.
Porter, M.
(1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 95-117.
41.
Pryke, R.
(1987). Competition among international airlines. London: Gower.
42.
Russo, M.
,& Fouts, P. (1997). Aresource based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 534-559.
43.
Rust, R.
, & Cooil, B. (1994). Reliability measures for qualitative data: Theory and implications. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 135-148.
44.
Sawers, D.
(1987). Competition in the air. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
45.
Schuler, D.
(1996). Corporate political strategy and foreign competition: The case of the steel industry. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 720-737.
46.
Schumpeter, J.
(1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
47.
Shaffer, B.
(1992). Regulation, competition, and strategy: The case of automobile fuel economy standards, 1974-1991. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 13, 191-218.
48.
Shaffer, B.
(1995). Firm level responses to government regulation: Theoretical and research approaches. Journal of Management, 21, 495-514.
49.
Shipper, F.
, & Jennings, M. (1984). Business strategy for the political arena. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
50.
Smith, K. G.
, Grimm, C.,& Gannon, M. (1992). Dynamics of competitive strategy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51.
Smith, K. G.
, Grimm, C., Gannon, M.,& Chen, M. (1991). Organizational information processing, competitive responses, and performance in the U.S. domestic airline industry. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 60-85.
52.
Young, G.
, Smith, K. G., & Grimm, C. (1996). “Austrian” and industrial organization perspectives on firm-level competitive activity and performance. Organization Science, 7, 243-254.
