This article presents a contingency theory of corporate social performance as a function of the fit between the nature of the social issue and its corresponding strategies and structures. In so doing, it integrates elements of the corporate social responsiveness, issues management, and stakeholder management literatures. The conclusion discusses the limitations of the model and suggests directions for future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ackerman, R. E.
(1973). How companies respond to social demands. Harvard Business Review, 51(4), 88-98.
2.
Austin, J. E.
, & Kohn, T. O. (1990). Strategic management in developing countries: Case studies. New York: Free Press.
3.
Bauer, R.
(1990). The corporate response process. In L. E. Preston (Ed.), Corporation and society research: Studies in theory and measurement(pp. 179-202). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
4.
Berthoin Antal, A.
(1985). Institutionalizing corporate social responsiveness: Lessons learned from the Migros experience. In L. Preston (Ed.), Research in corporate social policy and performance(Vol. 7, pp. 229-249). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
5.
Bhambri, A.
, & Sonnenfeld, J. (1988). Organization structure and corporate social performance: Afield study in two contrasting industries. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 642-662.
6.
Bigelow, B.
, Fahey, L., & Mahon, J. F. (1993). A typology of issue evolution. Business & Society, 32, 18-29.
7.
Boisot, M.
,& Child, J. (1988). The iron law of fiefs: Bureaucratic failure and the problem of governance in Chinese economic reforms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 507-527.
8.
Burton, B. K.
,& Dunn, C. P. (1996). Feminist ethics as moral grounding for stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6, 133-147.
9.
Calton, J. M.
, & Lad, L. J. (1993). Collaborative governance: The firm, the interorganizational field, and “negotiated order.” In J. Pasquero & D. Collins (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society(pp. 84-89). San Diego, CA: International Association for Business and Society.
10.
Carroll, A. B.
(1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.
11.
Center for Business Ethics
. (1986). Are corporations institutionalizing business ethics? Journal of Business Ethics, 5, 85-91.
12.
Chandler, A. D.
(1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Cambridge: MIT Press.
13.
Clarkson, M.B.E.
(1990). Corporate social performance in Canada, 1976-1986. In L. E. Preston (Ed.), Corporation and society research: Studies in theory and measurement(pp. 281-305). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
14.
Clarkson, M.B.E.
(1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92-117.
15.
Clinard, M. B.
(1983). Corporate ethics and crime: The role of middle management. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16.
Collins, D. (1991, August). An organization performance matrix: A framework for broadbased performance measures. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Miami, FL.
17.
Conant, J. S.
, Mokwa, M. P.,& Varadarajan, P. R. (1990). Strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance: A multiple measures-based study. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 365-383.
18.
Dierkes, M.
(1985). Corporate social reporting and auditing: Theory and practice. In K. J. Hopt & G. Teubner (Eds.), Corporate governance and directors’ liabilities(pp. 354-379). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
19.
Dierkes, M.
(1990). Corporate social reporting and performance in Germany. In L. E. Preston (Ed.), International and comparative corporation and society research(pp. 227-265). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
20.
Doty, D. H.
,& Glick, W. H. (1994). Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Academy of Management Review, 19, 230-251.
21.
Doty, D. H.
, Glick, W. H., & Huber, G. P. (1993). Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1196-1250.
22.
Entine, J.
(1995). The Body Shop: Truth & consequences. Drug & Cosmetic Industry, 156(2), 54-54.
23.
Entine, J.
(1997). Vivisecting the anti-vivsectionist movement. Drug & Cosmetic Industry, 160(1), 38-41.
24.
Epstein, E. M.
(1987). The corporate social policy process: Beyond business ethics, corporate social responsibility, corporate social responsiveness. California Management Review, 29, 99-114.
25.
Ewing, D. W.
(1989). Justice on the job: Resolving grievances in the nonunion workplace. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
26.
Filios, V. P.
(1986). Review and analysis of the empirical research in corporate social accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 5, 291-306.
27.
Frederick, W. C.
(1986, Winter). Toward CSR 3: ethical analysis is indispensable in corporate affairs. California Management Review, 28, 126-141.
28.
Frederick, W. C.
(1994). From CSR 1 CSR2: The maturing of business and society thought. Business & Society, 33, 150-164.
29.
Freeman, R. E.
(1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
30.
Freeman, R. E.
, & Evan, W. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(4), 337-359.
31.
Freeman, R. E.
, & Gilbert, D. R., Jr. (1988). Corporate strategy and the search for ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
32.
Frooman, J.
(1997). Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth. Business & Society, 36, 221-249.
33.
Gray, B.
(1991). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34.
Griffin, J. J.
, & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36, 5-31.
35.
Harman, W.
(1993). Intuition in managerial decision-making: Codeword for global transformation. In B. Sutton (Ed.), The legitimate corporation: Essential readings in business ethics and corporate governance(pp. 224-239). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
36.
Holman, W. R.
, New, R. J., & Singer, D. (1990). The impact of corporate social responsiveness on shareholder wealth. In L. E. Preston (Ed.), Corporation and society research: Studies in theory and measurement(pp. 265-280). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
37.
Holmes, S. L.
(1978). Adapting corporate structure for social responsiveness. California Management Review, 21, 47-54.
38.
Hosmer, L. T.
(1987). The ethics of management. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
39.
Husted, B. W.
(1993). Reliability and the design of ethical organizations: A rational systems approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 761-769.
40.
James, W. L.
,& Hatten, K. J. (1995). Further evidence on the validity of the self-typing paragraph approach: Miles and Snowstrategic archetypes in banking. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 161-168.
41.
Johnson, D. A.
(1986). Confronting corporate power: Strategies and phases of the Nestlé boycott. In L. E. Preston (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy(Vol. 8, pp. 323-344). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
42.
Johnson, M.
(1993). Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Jones, T. M.
(1980, Spring). Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. California Management Review, 22, 59-67.
44.
Jones, T. M.
(1983). An integrating framework for research in business and society: A step toward the elusive paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 8, 559-564.
45.
Jones, T. M.
(1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issuecontingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366-395.
46.
Jones, T. M.
(1994). The Toronto Conference: Reflections on stakeholder theory. Business& Society, 33, 82-131.
47.
Kohls, J.
(1985). Corporate board structure, social reporting and social performance. In L. E. Preston (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy(pp. 165-189). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
48.
Kuhn, T. S.
(1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
Lachman, R.
, & Wolfe, R. A. (1997). The interface of organizational effectiveness and corporate social performance: Opportunities for research and theory development. Business & Society, 36, 194-214.
50.
Landau, M.
(1969). Redundancy, rationality, and the problem of duplication and overlap. Public Administration Review, 29, 346-358.
51.
Landau, M.
(1972). Political theory and political science. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
52.
Lenway, S. A.
, & Crawford, B. (1990). When business becomes politics: Risk and uncertainty in East-West trade. In L. E. Preston (Ed.), International and comparative corporation and society research(pp. 177-201). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
53.
Lorange, P.
, Scott Morton, M. F., & Ghoshal, S. (1986). Strategic control systems. St. Paul, MN: West.
54.
Mahon, J. F.
,& Waddock, S. A. (1992). Strategic issues management: An integration of issue life cycle perspectives. Business & Society, 31(1), 19-32.
55.
McCoy, C. S.
, & Twining, F. N. (1988). The corporate ethics program at the McDonnell Douglas Corporation. In J. Keogh (Ed.), Corporate ethics: A prime business asset(pp. 105-114). New York: The Business Roundtable.
56.
McGuire, J. B.
, Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Review, 31, 854-872.
57.
Merton, R. K.
(1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
58.
Miles, R. E.
, & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
59.
Miles, R. E.
,& Snow, C. C. (1984, Spring). Fit, failure, and the hall of fame. California Management Review, 26, 10-28.
60.
Miles, R. H.
(1987). Managing the corporate social environment: A grounded theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
61.
Mitchell, R. K.
, Agle, B. R.,& Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886.
62.
Mitnick, B. M.
(1993). Organizing research in corporate social performance: The CSP system as core paradigm. In J. Pasquero & D. Collins (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society(pp. 2-15). San Diego, CA: International Association for Business and Society.
63.
Morris, S. A.
(1997). Internal effects of stakeholder management devices. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 413-424.
64.
Murphy, P. E.
(1988). Implementing business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 907-915.
65.
Murphy, P. E.
(1989, Winter). Creating ethical corporate structures. Sloan Management Review, 30, 81-87.
66.
Myers, Paul S.
(1990). Paul Cronan and the NewEngland Telephone Company (A). Harvard Business School Case 9-490-055: Harvard Business School Press.
67.
Nash, L. L.
(1988). Johnson and Johnson’s credo. In J. Keogh (Ed.), Corporate ethics: A prime business asset(pp. 77-104). New York: The Business Roundtable.
68.
Nasi, J.
, Nasi, S., Phillips, N.,& Zyglidopoulos, S. (1997). The evolution of corporate social responsiveness: An exploratory study of Finnish and Canadian forestry companies. Business & Society, 36(3), 296-321.
69.
Nathan, M. L.
, & Mitroff, I. I. (1991). The use of negotiated order theory as a tool for the analysis and development of an interorganizational field. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 163-180.
70.
Ouchi, W. G.
(1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 129-141.
71.
Pfeffer, J.
, & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependency perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
72.
Polanyi, M.
(1962). Personal knowledge: Toward a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73.
Post, J. E.
(1985). Assessing the Nestlé boycott: Corporate accountability and human rights. California Management Review, 27, 113-131.
74.
Post, J. E.
(1990). Research on patterns of corporate response to social change. In L. E. Preston (Ed.), Corporation and society research: Studies in theory and measurement(pp. 89-111). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
75.
Preston, L. E.
(1990a). Corporate social policy and performance: A synthetic framework for research and analysis. In L. E. Preston (Ed.), Corporation and society research: Studies in theory and measurement(pp. 63-87). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
76.
Preston, L. E.
(1990b). Corporation-society research: Retrospect and prospect. In L. E. Preston (Ed.), Corporation and society research: Studies in theory and measurement(pp. 1-25). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
77.
Quinn, R. E.
, & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29, 363-377.
78.
Reed, L.
, Getz, K., Collins, D., Oberman, W., & Toy, R. (1990). Theoretical models and empirical results: A review and synthesis of JAI Volumes 1-10. In L. E. Preston (Ed.), Corporation and society research: Studies in theory and measurement(pp. 27-62). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
79.
Rey, F.
(1990). Corporate social performance and reporting in France. In L. E. Preston (Ed.), International and comparative corporation and society research(pp. 267-301). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
80.
Rumelt, R. P.
(1974). Strategy, structure, and economic performance. Boston: Harvard Business School, Division of Research.
81.
Savage, G. T.
, Nix, T. W., Whitehead, C. J.,& Blair, J. D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. The Executive, 5(2), 61-75.
82.
Schoonhoven, C. B.
(1981). Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency “theory.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 349-377.
83.
Schwenk, C. R.
(1984). Devil’s advocacy in managerial decision-making. Journal of Management Studies, 21, 153-168.
84.
Sturdivant, F. D.
(1979, Fall). Executives and activists: Test of stakeholder management. California Management Review, 22, 53-59.
85.
Swanson, D. L.
(1995). Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 20, 43-64.
86.
Thibaut, J. W.
, & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541-566.
87.
Thompson, J. D.
,& Tuden, A. (1959). Strategies, structures, and processes of organizational decision. In J. D. Thompson (Ed.), Comparative Studies in Administration(pp. 195-216). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
88.
Van de Ven, A. H.
, & Drazin, R. (1985). The concept of fit in contingency theory. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior(Vol. 7, pp. 333-365). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
89.
Vaughan, D.
(1990). Autonomy, interdependence, and social control: NASA and the space shuttle Challenger. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 225-257.
90.
Waddock, S. A.
, & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303-319.
91.
Wartick, S. L.
, & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10, 758-769.
92.
Wartick, S. L.
, & Mahon, J. F. (1994). Toward a substantive definition of the corporate issue construct: A review and synthesis of the literature. Business & Society, 33, 293-311.
93.
Wholey, D. R.
,& Brittain, J. W. (1986). Organizational ecology: Findings and implications. Academy of Management Review, 11, 513-533.
94.
Wicks, A. C.
, Gilbert, D. R., & Freeman, R. E. (1994). A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 475-497.
95.
Wokutch, R. E.
, & McKinney, E. W. (1991). Behavioral and perceptual measures of corporate social performance. In J. E. Post (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy(Vol. 12, pp. 309-330). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
96.
Wood, D. J.
(1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691-718.
97.
Wood, D. J.
, & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3, 229-267.
98.
Zammuto, Raymond F.
(1984). A comparison of multiple constituency models of organizational effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 9, 606-616.
