This article argues that children should be treated as a specific media audience in their own right, who are engaged in actively learning how to read media texts. I use children's talk about horror videos to argue for a social theory of learning in which both talk about text and the social contexts in which the genre circulates orientate readers towards its content and the subject positions from which it can be read.
AngI. (1983). Watching Dallas: Soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. London: Methuen
2.
AngI. (1989). Wanted: Audiences: On the politics of empirical audience studies. In SeiterE.Remote control. London: Routledge
3.
BarlowO.HillA. (Eds.). (1985). Video violence and children. London: Hodder & Stoughton
4.
BranstonG. (1992). Audience. In LustedD. (Ed), The media studies book. London: Routledge
5.
CloverC. (1989). Her body, himself: Gender in the slasher film. In DonaldJ. (Ed.), Fantasy and the cinema. London: British Film Institute
6.
DaviesB. (1987). Frogs and snails and feminist tales. Sydney: Allen & Unwin
7.
DyerR. (1981). Coronation Street. London: British Film Institute
8.
FiskeJ. (1987). Television culture. London: Methuen
9.
HeapJ. (1989). A situated perspective on what counts as reading. In BakerC.LukeA. (Eds.), Towards a critical sociology of reading pedagogy: Papers of the 12th World Congress on Reading. Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins North America
10.
HobsonD. (1982). Crossroad: The drama of a soap opera. London: Methuen
11.
MorleyD. (1980). The nationwide audience. London: British Film Institute
12.
NealeS. (1980). Genre. London: British Film Institute
13.
Northern Examining Association. (1988). Media Studies: Syllabus A. Manchester: Author
14.
QuinR.McMahonB. (1993). Monitoring standards in media studies: Problems and strategies. Australian Journal of Education, 37 (2), 182–197
15.
RadwayJ. (1984). Reading the romance. Chapel Hill. NC: University of North Carolina Press
16.
TurnbullS. (1993). The media: Moral lessons and moral careers. Australian Journal of Education, 37 (2), 153–168
