Past research has often highlighted problems of science and mathematics education. As a consequence, case studies of exemplary teachers were conducted to emphasize positive aspects and to stimulate and improve science and mathematics education. Comparisons of three exemplary teachers with colleagues from the same schools indicated that the exemplary teachers used effective classroom management strategies; used a range of whole-class, small-group and seat-work activities; kept students on-task; and monitored the extent to which students understood the content to be learned. In contrast, the comparison teachers had difficulty in maintaining discipline, emphasized whole-class activities and focused on content coverage rather than student understanding.
Carnegie Foundation. (1983). High School: An Agenda for Action. New York: Carnegie Foundation.
4.
CockroftW. H. (1982). Mathematics Counts. London: HMSO.
5.
CohenM. (1982, January-February). Effective schools, accumulating research findings. American Education, pp. 13–16.
6.
College Board. (1983). Academic Preparation for College: What Students need to know and be able to do. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
7.
DriscollM. (1985). A Study of Exemplary Mathematics Programs: Final Report (National Institute of Education Contract NIE 400-83-0010). Chelmsford, MA: Northeast Regional Exchange Inc.
8.
GoodladJ. I. (1984). A Place called School: Prospects for the Future. New York: Macmillan.
9.
LaschC. (1985). Excellence in education: Old refrain or new departure. Issues in Education, 3, 1–12.
10.
LovittC. (1985). The Mathematics Project will develop a bank of exemplary teaching packages. Curriculum Development in Australian Schools, Issue 1, 27.
11.
LovittC.ClarkeD. (1986). MCTP first year report. Unpublished report, Mathematics Curriculum and Teaching Program, Melbourne.
12.
LovittC.ClarkeD. (1987). The winds of change are sweeping through maths education. Curriculum Development in Australian Schools, Issue 3, 37.
13.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
14.
PenickJ. E. (Ed.). (1983). Focus on Excellence: Science as Inquiry. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Assocation.
15.
PenickJ. E.BonnstetterR. J. (Eds.). (1983). Focus on Excellence: Biology. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
16.
PenickJ. E.LunettaV. N. (Eds.). (1984). Focus on Excellence: Physical Science. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
17.
PenickJ. E.YagerR. E. (1983). The search for excellence in science education. Phi Delta Kappan, 64(9), 621–3.
18.
PinesA. L.WestL. H. T. (1986). Conceptual understanding and science learning: An interpretation of research within a sources-of-knowledge framework. Science Education, 70, 583–604.
19.
RosarioJ. R. (1986). Excellence, school culture, and lessons in futility: Another case against simplistic views of educational change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18, 31–43.
20.
SanfordJ. P. (1987). Management of science classroom tasks and effects on students' learning opportunities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(3), 249–65.
21.
ShufeltG.SmartJ. R. (Eds). (1983). The Agenda in Action. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
22.
ShulmanL. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
23.
SiegelM. H. (1983). The statistical survey: A felt need. In ShufeltG. & SmartJ. R. (Eds.), The Agenda in Action. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
24.
StakeR. E.EasleyJ.A. (1978). Case Studies in Science Education (Vols 1 & 2). Urbana: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champagne, Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation and Committee on Culture and Cognition.
25.
TobinK.EspinetM.ByrdS. E. (1987, April). The work of teachers and students in high school mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
26.
TobinK.FraserB. J. (Eds.). (1987). Exemplary Practice in Science and Mathematics Teaching. Perth: Curtin University of Technology.
27.
TobinK.GallagherJ. J. (1987). Target students in the the science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(1), 61–75.
28.
TobinK.MaloneJ. (1986). Target students in mathematics classes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
29.
von GlasersfeldE. (1981). The concepts of adaptation and viability in a radical constructivist theory of knowledge. In SigelI. E.BrodzinskyD. M.GolinkoffR. M.New Directions in Piagetian Theory and Practice (pp. 87–95). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30.
YagerR. E. (1984). Searching for excellence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
31.
YingerR. J. (1979). Routines in teacher planning. Theory into Practice, 18, 163–9.
