Participative Decision Making for Teachers

Abstract

Any reader who delves into the literature on decision making in schools soon discovers that informed opinion and the research evidence, as it is interpreted, weigh heavily in favour of teacher participation, due regard having been paid to a number of practical problems in its successful implementation. The findings reported in this paper challenge the easy assumption that feelings of satisfaction experienced as a result of decision making involvement lead to increased satisfaction with teaching as a chosen career. The challenge is mounted on two fronts. First, introduction of the concept of Professional Satisfaction (i.e., the state of satisfaction which results from gratification of the need of or want for professional autonomy) enables a number of relationships to be examined in a new light. Second, since structures alone do not guarantee satisfying levels of participation in decision making, interpersonal considerations also need to be taken into account. Hence, the variable, Rapport with the Principal, is woven into the study, the data for which were provided by a Canadian sample of 213 first and second year teachers.

References

Lortie

D. C.

The balance of control and autonomy in elementary school teaching. In Etzioni

(Ed.) The Semi-Professions and their Organization. New York: The Free Press, 1969, 32.

Hewitson

M. T.

The professional satisfaction of beginning teachers. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, 1975.

Smith

C. G.

Ari

O. N.

Organizational control structure and member consensus. In Tannenbaum

A. S.

, Control in Organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968, 163.

Etzioni

Modern Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964, 45.

Schein

E. H.

Organizational Psychology. Second Edition. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1970, 77.

See Hewitson

M. T.

Supervision, rapport with the principal, and beginning teacher satisfaction. In Canadian Administrator, 1976, XV, 7, 1–5.

Anderson

B. D.

Brown

A. F.

Who's a good principal. In Canadian Administrator, 1966, VI, 3, 12.

McNamara

V. D.

Enns

Directive leadership and staff acceptance of the principal. In Canadian Administrator, 1966, VI, 2, 7.

Bentley

R. R.

Rempel

A. M.

Manual for the Purdue Teacher Opinionnaire. West Lafayette, Indiana: University Book Store, 1970, 4.

10.

Miklos

Increasing participation in decision making. In Canadian Administrator, 1970, IX, 6, 25.

11.

Fiedler

F. E.

Leadership—a new model. In Gibb

C. A.

(Ed.) Leadership. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin, 1969, 233.

12.

See, for example: Harvey

S. W.

, Staff morale. In The Leader, 1972, 5, 1, 42; Dadd, F. E. Supervision and morale. In The Leader, 1971, 4, 6, 55; Grassie, McC. C. and Carss, B. W. School structure, leadership quality and teacher satisfaction. In Educational Administration Quarterly, 1973, IX, 1, 25; Simpson, T. A. Teacher-principal interaction as a source of satisfaction and dissatisfaction. In Administrator's Bulletin, 1973, 4, 6, 1.

Participative Decision Making for Teachers—Placebo or Panacea?

Abstract

References