Commonwealth of Australia. Report of The Committee of Economic Enquiry. Volume II, May 1965, table C.23, p. 504.
2.
“The New Secondary School Population in Australia”. Quarterly Review of Australian Education, 1, December 1967, 2. (This issue of the Review gives a very good coverage of the changes in secondary school population.)
3.
The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. Tertiary Education in Australia. Report of the Committee on the Future of Tertiary Education in Australia to the Australian Universities Commission. Canberra: Commonwealth Government Printer, 1965. Volume I, table 10, page 17.
4.
Quarterly Review of Australian Education, 1, December 1967.
5.
See Women in the Work Force. “Facts and Figures” and. “Trends in Employment”. Department of Labour and National Service, Commonwealth of Australia, July 1967.
6.
Schools, 1966. Commonwealth Bureau of Census and Statistics. Separate figures are not available for primary and secondary teachers.
7.
BerkeleyG. F.“What the Statistical Survey Reveals.” The Australian College of Education. Teachers in Australia. Melbourne: Cheshire, 1966, 22–37.
8.
Teachers in Australian Schools — A Report by the Australian College of Education.
Report of Third Triennial Conference of the Directors of Teacher Education, October, 1966.
11.
The Martin Report used an allowance of 7% of total strength to account for losses due to resignations, etc. This has probably increased since then because of the greater numbers of married women employed.
12.
See also for a discussion on estimates of wastage — (i) Interim Report on Post-Primary Staffing and Recruitment — Commission on Education in New Zealand. Wellington, 1960, 29–30. (ii) A.C.E. Teachers in Australian Schools, 73.
13.
It is estimated that in the last 35 years in Queensland some 13,000 women have passed through Departmental Teachers' Colleges. As the total number of married women currently employed in the State service is 1,800, there must be some thousands of trained teachers who at least are potential returners to the service.
14.
Tertiary Education in Australia. Table 23, page 31.
15.
For example, Resources of Scientific and Technical Personnel in the O.E.C.D. Area. Statistical Report of the Third International Survey on the Demand for and the Supply of Scientific and Technical Personnel. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1963.
16.
See (i) WilliamsC.Graduation and Employment, A Survey of the Graduates of the University of Queensland, 1961. University of Queensland Press, 1965. (ii)RaynerS. A.Occupational Surveys Nos. 1–5, dealing with supply, demand and remuneration in Dentistry, Veterinary Science, Architecture, Pharmacy and Surveying. University of Queensland Press, 1960–1966.
17.
For a good discussion of recent developments in manpower planning, its limitations and its effect, and relation to educational planning see “Questions for Planners”. Trends in Education, 7, July 1967. (ii) Asten, H. S. “Patterns of Career Choices Over Time.” The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 46, February 1967, 541–546. (iii) Lewis, R. and Maude, A. Professional People. London: Phoenix House, 1952, Ch. XIII “Rewards and Costs”, 231–258.
18.
(i) For a discussion of methods of determining the percentage of a cohort with the mental ability to qualify for higher education, see de WolffP.“Intellectual Resources and the Growth of Higher Education.” Forecasting Manpower Needs for the Age of Science. Office for Scientific and Technical Personnel, Organization for European Economic Co-operation, 1960, Chapter 12. (ii) For a discussion of changes in the percentage of those completing secondary school and entering Teachers' college in Queensland, seeA Comparative Study of Queensland Teachers' College Students, 1956 and1964. Research and Guidance Branch Bulletin No. 26, 1965.
19.
See (i) HillG. B.“Choice of Career by Grammar School Boys”. Occupational Psychology, 39, October 1965, 279–287.
20.
AlfordN. D.Values Characterising Beginning Teachers. Unpublished M.Ed. Thesis, University of Queensland, 1967, 84.
21.
MasonW. S.The Beginning Teacher. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, No. 6144, 12.
22.
BassettG. W.“The Occupational Background of Teachers.”The Australian Journal of Education, 2, July 1958.
23.
“Undergraduate Attitudes to Teaching.”Trends in Education, 2, April 1966. Department of Education and Science, H.M.S.O..
24.
Gravell. A report on Professional Incomes in Victoria, June, 1964. University of Melbourne Appointments Board.
25.
33rd Annual Report, 1966, University of Melbourne Appointments Board, 30–31.
26.
ConnorsT.“Economic Graduates Switch to Business.”Australian Financial Review, July 7th, 1967.
27.
WoodringPaul. New Directions in Teacher Education. The Fund for the Advancement of Education, 72–73.
28.
HettlerR. A.“Team Teaching — a New Tool for Spreading Teacher Talent.”Modern Education, 1, November-December 1967.
29.
MatthewBrian. “What is a Teacher?” The Secondary Teacher, August 1966, 18.
30.
Review of Educational Research, 37, October 1967, 455.
31.
“Time Devoted to School Studies.” N.E.A. Research Bulletin, 40, October 1962, 86–87.
32.
See (i) The Journal of Teacher Education, vii, June 1956. (ii) Morse, A. D. Schools of Tomorrow — Today. New York: Doubleday, 1960, Chapter 4, “Freeing the Teacher for Teaching”.
33.
MorseA. D.Op. cit., 75.
34.
Department of Education and Science. Children and Their Primary Schools — A Report of the Central Advisory Council for Education (England). London: H.M.S.O., Volume I.
35.
Department of Education and Science., 319.
36.
For a good discussion of what is meant by the term “team teaching” see Chapter 5 of RicheyHerman G. (Ed.), The Changing American School. N.S.S.E. Yearbook, LXV, Part II. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1966, 110–134.
37.
Review of Educational Research, XXIV, op. cit., 456.