TiedtS. W.The Role of the Federal Government in Education. New York: Oxford University Press, 1966, 16–17.
2.
Commonwealth of Australia. Parliamentary Debates. Session 1945, 184, 4618.
3.
The Commonwealth Government in Education. July 1966, 3.
4.
Ibid, 5.
5.
Ibid., 4.
6.
TiedtS. W.op. cit., 28.
7.
MungerF. J.FennoR. F.National Politics and Federal Aid to Education. New York: Syracuse University Press, 1962.
8.
MerantoP.The Politics of Federal Aid to Education in 1965.New York: Syracuse University Press, 1967.
9.
TiedtS. W.op. cit., 190–191.
10.
N.E.A. Research Bulletin, 44, 1, February 1966, 22; and 45, 1, March 1967, 6.
11.
For a detailed discussion of the operation of Title II over the three year period, 1966–1968, seeGibbsH. M.“Title II of E.S.E.A.”Phi Delta Kappan, XLIX, 6, February 1968, 321–323.
12.
The Age, 25th May, 1967; and, 26th July, 1967.
13.
CampbellR. F.LaytonDonald H.“Thrust and Counterthrust in Education Policy Making”Phi Delta Kappan, op. cit., 290–294.
14.
Educational Researcher, February 1967, 14.
15.
TiedtS. W.op. cit., 191.
16.
Educational Researcher, op. cit., 11.
17.
Ibid.—quoted.
18.
Education News, 11, 6, December 1967, 4.
19.
Op. cit., 290–291.
20.
The Canberra Times, 13th March, 1968, quoted the Minister for Education and Science as expressing the hope that in the long term education in the territories— particularly the A.C.T.—could be developed as a model for the States.
21.
KeppelF.“The New Partnership”. A.A.S.A. Official Report, 1966, 81.
22.
WaysonW. W.“The Political Revolution in Education”Phi Delta Kappan, XLVII. 7, March 1966, 338.