Australian Council for Educational Research. Individual differences in the Primary School and their Implications for Classroom Organization. Bibliography of journal articles, A.C.E.R., June 1962.
2.
BassettG. W. (Ed.). Each One is Different. Melbourne: A.C.E.R., 1965 See particularly Appendix 2—The Non-Graded School: Paper prepared by the Western Australian Participants Appendix 3 (i)—The Development of Grading and Grouping Methods: McCulloch, R. W. Appendix 3 (ii)—A Review of Research on Ability Grouping: McCulloch, R. W. Appendix 5—Some Materials which help to Individualize Instruction.
3.
BilesDavid. An Investigation into Anxiety at Brunswick North Experimental School; unpublished duplicated article, held by the Victorian Institute of Educational Research, 1965.
4.
Education Department of Queensland. An Evaluation of a Non-graded Organization in a large Queensland Primary School, Bulletin No. 31, August 1966.
5.
Education Department of Western Australia. The Secondary School Curriculum. W. Aust. Ed. Dept., 1965.
6.
McCullochR. W.“The Organization of Schools for Individual Talent”, in Each to his Full Stature, The Australian College of Education, Melbourne: Cheshire, 1965, 16–42.
7.
Staff of Experimental School, Brunswick North, The Ungraded School, Duplicated Interim Reports No. 1, 2, 3, 1965, 1966.
8.
Modern Teaching Methods Association Report. “A Quick Look at Ungraded Schools”. The Teachers' Journal, XLIX, 2, April 1966, 89–90, and “A Further Look at Ungraded Schools” (DrummondD. J., ii), The Teachers' Journal, XLIX, 3 May 1966, 138–139.
9.
ZagamiO. S.The Edmonton System of Continuous Progress as Tried in a Queensland Primary School. Duplicated Address, Australian College of Education, 1965. Part B.—Other Publications The following is a selection of references from overseas publications.
10.
AndersonR. C.“The Case for Nongraded, Homogeneous Grouping”. The Elementary School Journal, 62, January 1962, 193–197.
11.
CarboneR. F.“A Comparison of Graded and Non-Graded Elementary Schools”. The Elementary School Journal, 62, November 1961, 82–88.
12.
DownsM. E.“The Ungraded Primary School”. School and Community, February 1960.
13.
FlemingC. M.Teaching: A Psychological Analysis. London: Methuen, 1958–964.
14.
GoodladJ. I.AndersonR. H.The Ungraded Elementary School, Revised Edition, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World Inc., 1963.
15.
GoodladJ. I.“Inadequacy of Graded Organization—What then?”, Childhood Education, 39, 6, February 1963, 274–281.
16.
GoodladJ. I.“Classroom Organization”, Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Third Edition, Ed. HarrisC. W., New York: The Macmillan Co., 1960, 221–226.
17.
HaanA.Elementary School Curriculum: Theory and Research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1961.
18.
HillsonM.JonesJ. C.MooreJ. W.“A Controlled Experiment Evaluating the Effects of a Non-Graded Organization in Pupil Achievement, J. of Educ. Res., 57, July-August 1964, 548–550.
19.
JenkinsG. G.Helping Children Reach their Potential. Chicago: Scott, Foresman & Co., 1961.
20.
PerkinsH. V.Non-Graded Programs: What Progress?, pp. 505–510 in RippleR. E. (Ed.), Readings in Learning and Human Abilities: Educational Psychology, New York: Harper & Row, 1964.
21.
RamseyW.“An Evaluation of a Joplin Plan of Grouping for Reading Instruction”, J. Educ. Res., 55, August 1962, 567–572.
22.
SkapskiM. K.“Ungraded Primary Reading Program: An Objective Evaluation”, Elementary School Journal, 61, October 1960, 41–45.
23.
StoddardG. D. In HunnicuttC. W. Ed. “Education 2000 a.d.”. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1956.
24.
The Edmonton Continuous Progress Plan. Principals' Manual, Third Draft, 1962.