HardieC. D.“Education and the Revolution in Philosophy”. The Forum of Education, XXII, 2, September 1963, 65–77; Mackie, Margaret. “The Philosophy of Education”. The Forum of Education, XXIII, 2, September 1964, 126–129; Hardie, C. D. “Has the Philosophy of Education any Content?” The Forum of Education, XXIV, 1, March 1965, 58–60.
BlackM.“A Note in ‘Philosophy of Education’”. Harvard Educational Review, 26, 2, 1956, 155.
4.
ReisnerE. H.“Philosophy and Science in the Western World: A Historical Overview”. 41st Yearbook of N.S.S.E., 1942, 36–37; Hook, S. “The Scope of Philosophy of Education”. Harvard Educational Review, 26, 2, 1956, 148; Burnett, J. F. Educational Theory, XI, 2, 1961, 68; Burns, H. W. “The Logic of the ‘Educational Implication’”. Educational Theory, XII, 1, 1962, 56.
5.
UlichR.Philosophy of Education. American Book Co., 1961.
6.
WittgensteinL.Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1922, 4, 112, 77.
7.
Ibid.
8.
E.g.CoplestonF.Contemporary Philosophy. London: Burns and Oates, 1956, 43.
9.
AyerA. J.Language, Truth and Logic. London: Victor Gollancz, 2nd Edition, 1946, Introduction, 5 ff.
10.
Questioned by Wittgenstein himself. SeePassmoreJ.A Hundred Years of Philosophy. London: Gerald Duckworth and Co., 1957, 371.
11.
For opposing metaphysical and positivist viewpoints on verifiability, seeEdwardsP.PapA.A Modern Introduction to Philosophy. The Free Press, 1957, 604 ff. (Here the respective positions are debated by F. Copleston and A. J. Ayer).
12.
SeePassmoreJ.Op. cit., 371–372, for a summary of some of the difficulties of identifying verifiability with meaning.
13.
SeePowellJ. P.“Education and the Philosophers”. Aust. J. Educ., 9, 2, 1965, 133–136.