AngellD.LumsdaineA. A.Prompted Plus Unprompted Trials Versus Prompted Trials Alone in Paired-Associate Learning. Reported in Lumsdaine, A. A., and Glaser, R. Teaching Machines and Programmed Learning: A Source Book. Washington: National Educational Association, 1960, 582.
2.
CoulsonJ. E.SilbermanH. F.“Results of an Initial Experiment in Automated Teaching”, in Lumsdaine and Glaser, op. cit., 452–68, 464.
3.
CronbachLee J.“What Research Says About Programed Instruction”. N.E.A. Journal, LI (December, 1962), 45–7.
4.
Loc. cit., 47.
5.
Crowder, Norman A., quoted inKeevesJ. P.A Review of Programmed Instruction. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research, 1962, 62.
6.
CrowderNorman A.“On the Differences between Linear and Intrinsic Programing”. Phi Delta Kappan, XLIV, March, 1963, 251.
EigenL. D.KomoskiP. K.“Research Summary No. 1 of the Collegiate School Automatic Teaching Project”. Reported in Lumsdaine and Glaser, op. cit., 615–6.
14.
ElliottWilliam Y. (Ed.). Television's Impact on American Culture. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1956, 277.
15.
FinnJames D.PerrinDonald G.Teaching Machines and Programed Learning: A Survey of the Industry. Washington: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1962, x+85.
16.
FeldhusenJohn F.BirtAndrew A.“A Study of Nine Methods of Presentation of Programed Learning Material”. Journal of Educational Research, LV (June–July 1962), 461–6.
17.
FersterCharles B.SaponStanley M.“An Application of Recent Developments in Psychology to the Teaching of German”. Published in Lumsdaine and Glaser, op. cit., 173–85.
18.
GotkinLassar in Programed Instruction, I, December 1961, cited in Phi Delta Kappan. XLIV, March 1963, 254.
19.
Loc. cit.
20.
HoughJohn B.“An Analysis of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Selected Aspects of Machine Instruction”. Journal of Educational Research, LV, June–July 1962, 467–71.
21.
LumsdaineA. A.“Teaching Machines: An Introductory Overview”. In Lumsdaine and Glaser, op. cit., 6.
22.
McNamara and Hughes, cited inSchrammWilbur. Programed Instruction: Today and Tomorrow. Washington: The Fund for the Advancement of Education, 1962, 49.
23.
Porter cited in Schramm, op. cit., 48.
24.
PresseyS. L.“A Simple Apparatus which Gives Tests and Scores—and Teaches”. In Lumsdaine and Glaser, op. cit., 35.
25.
RobinsonDonald W.“Our Attempt to Answer: Programed Instruction: Gimmick or Breakthrough?”Phi Delta Kappan, XLIV, March 1963, 241.
26.
RoeArnold. “A Comparison of Branching Methods for Programmed Learning”. Journal of Educational Research, LV, June–July 1962, 407–16.
27.
Loc. cit.
28.
RothRobert Howard. “Student Reactions to Programed Learning”. Phi Delta Kappan, XLIV, March 1963, 278–81.
29.
SchrammWilbur. Programed Instruction: Today and Tomorrow. Washington: The Fund for the Advancement of Education, 1962, 16.
30.
Loc. cit., 45–7.
31.
Loc. cit., 52–70.
32.
Loc. cit., 53.
33.
Loc. cit., 68.
34.
SilbermanHarry F.“Self-Teaching Devices and Programmed Materials”. Review of Educational Research, XXXII (April 1962), 179–93, 188.
35.
SkinnerB. F.“The Science of Learning and the Art of Teaching”. In Lumsdaine and Glaser, op. cit., 99–113.
36.
Loc. cit., 105.
37.
SkinnerB. F.“Teaching Machines”. In Lumsdaine and Glaser, op. cit., 140.
38.
Skinner in Lumsdaine and Glaser, op. cit., 108.
39.
StakeRobert E.“The Teaching Machine: Tool of the Future or Passing Fancy?”Phi Delta Kappan, XLIV, March 1963, 247–9.
40.
StolurowLawrence M.“Before the Rascals Take Over … Let's Be Informed on Programed Instruction”. Phi Delta Kappan, XLIV, March 1963, 255–7.
41.
Loc. cit., 255, 256.
42.
StolurowLawrence M. In Programed Instruction, I, June 1962, reprinted in Phi Delta Kappan, XLIV, March 1963, 257.
43.
ThelenHerbert A.“Programed Materials Today”. The Educational Digest, XXVIII, April 1963, 24–7.
44.
WilhelmsFred T.“The Curriculum and Individual Differences”. In Individualizing Instruction: The Sixty-First Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Part I. Chicago: NSSE, 1962, 65.
