Recent world events such as the threat of terrorism and the global economic crises have rekindled an interest in ethics and values education. This study, conducted in Singapore, combines a Kohlbergian approach to the assessment of moral judgement with a framework based on the self-determination theory to assess the motivational regulations of adolescent students towards civics and moral education (CME). The findings show that the Singaporean students' development of moral reasoning follows the trend prescribed for their age groups in Kohlberg's theory. With regard to their motivation in CME, students showed a moderate degree of autonomous motivation, although the correlations between moral development stage and motivation in CME were low.
ArjoonS. (2005). Corporate governance: An ethical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 343–352.
2.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
BanduraA. (1991). Self-regulation of motivation through anticipatory and self-reactive mechanisms. In DiensthierR.A. (Ed.), Perspectives on motivation: Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 69–164). Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.
4.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
5.
BanduraA. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 21–41.
6.
BanduraA.BarbaranelliC.CapraraG.V.PastorelliC. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67(3), 1206–1222.
7.
BerkowitzM.W.BierM.C. (2007). What works in character education?Journal of Research in Character Education, 5(1), 29–48.
8.
BlackA.E.DeciE.L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740–756.
9.
BlasiA. (1995). Moral understanding and the moral personality: The process of moral integration. In KurtinesW.M.GewirtzJ.L. (Eds.), Moral Development: An Introduction (pp. 229–253). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
10.
BlasiA. (1999). Emotions and moral motivation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29(1), 1–19.
11.
BrimiH. (2009). Academic instructors or moral guides? Moral education in America and the teacher's dilemma. The Clearing House, 82(3), 125–130.
12.
BronfenbrennerU. (1962). Soviet methods of character education: Some implications for research. Religious Education, 57(4), 45–61.
13.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14.
ColbyA.KohlbergL. (1987a). The measurement of moral judgment: Theoretical foundations and research validation (Vol. 1.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
ColbyA.KohlbergL. (1987b). The measurement of moral judgment: Standard issues scoring manual (Vol. 2.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
ColbyA.KohlbergL.GibbsJ.LiebermanM. (1983). A longitudinal study of moral judgment. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, No. 48, 1–124.
DeciE.L.RyanR.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
19.
DeciE.L.RyanR.M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024–1037.
20.
DeciE.L.RyanR.M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In DienstbierR.A. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288). Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.
21.
DeciE.L.RyanR.M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
22.
EmbletonK.HelferD.S. (2007). The plague of plagiarism and academic dishonesty. Searcher, 15(6), 23–26.
23.
EspelageD.L.SwearerS. (2003). Research on school bullying and victimization: What have we learned and where do we go from here?School Psychology Review, 32(3), 365–383.
24.
FerrariJ.R. (2005). Impostor tendencies and academic dishonesty: Do they cheat their way to success?Social Behaviour and Personality: An International Journal, 33(1), 11–17.
25.
GarandeauC.F.CillessenA.H. N. (2006). From indirect aggression to invisible aggression: A conceptual view on bullying and peer group manipulation. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 11(6), 612–625.
26.
GibbsJ.C.BasingerK.S.GrimeR.L.SnareyJ.R. (2007). Moral judgment development across cultures: Revisiting Kohlberg's universality claims. Developmental Review, 27(4), 443–500.
27.
GibbsJ.C.MoshmanD.BerkowitzM.W.BasingerK.S.GrimeR.L. (2009). Taking development seriously: Critique of the 2008 JME special issue on moral functioning. Journal of Moral Education, 38(3), 271–282.
28.
GilliganC. (1982.) In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
IheomaE. (1985). Moral education in Nigeria: Problems and prospects. Journal of Moral Education, 14(3), 183–193.
30.
KimM.SankeyD. (2009). Towards a dynamic systems approach to moral development and moral education: A response to the JME special issue, September 2008. Journal of Moral Education, 38(3), 283–298.
31.
KohlbergL. (1958). The development of modes of moral thinking and choice in the years 10–16. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Chicago.
32.
KohlbergL. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In MischelT. (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology (pp. 151–232). New York, NY: Academic Press.
33.
KohlbergL. (1973). Continuities in childhood and adult moral development revisited. In BaltesP.B.SchaieK.W. (Eds.), Lifespan developmental psychology: Personality and socialization (pp. 179–234). New York, NY: Academic Press.
34.
KrebsD.L.DentonK. (2005). Toward a more pragmatic approach to morality: A critical evaluation of Kohlberg's model. Psychological Review, 112(3), 629–649.
LapsleyD.K.HillP.L. (2008). On dual processing and heuristic approaches to moral cognition. Journal of Moral Education, 37(3), 313–332.
37.
LosierG.F.PerreaultS.KoestnerR.VallerandR.J. (2001). Examining individual differences in the internalization of political values: Validation of the self-determination scale of political motivation. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 41–61.
38.
MatembaY.H. (2010). Continuity and change in the development of moral education in Botswana. Journal of Moral Education, 39(3), 329–343.
39.
MeléD. (2005). Ethical education in accounting: Integrating rules, values, and virtues. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(1), 97–109.
40.
Ministry of Education (Singapore). (2009). 2009 Education statistics digest. Singapore: Ministry of Education, Planning Division.
41.
NarvaezD.LapsleyD.K. (2008). Teaching moral character: Two alternatives for teacher education. Teacher Educator, 43, 156–172.
42.
NarvaezD.RestJ. (1995). The four components of acting morally. In KurtinesW.GewirtzJ. (Eds.), Moral behaviour and moral development: An introduction (pp. 385–400). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
43.
NeyrinckB.VansteenkisteM.LensW.HutsebautD.DuriezB. (2006). Cognitive, affective and behavioural correlates of internalization of regulations for religious activities. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 321–332.
ParkN.PetersonC. (2006). Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents: The development and validation of the values in action inventory of strengths for youth. Journal of Adolescence, 29(6), 891–909.
46.
QiW.X.TangH.W. (2004). The social and cultural background of contemporary moral education in China. Journal of Moral Education, 33(4), 465–480.
ReedD.C. (2008). A model of moral stages. Journal of Moral Education, 37(3), 357–376.
49.
ReedD.C. (2009). A multi-level model of moral functioning revisited. Journal of Moral Education, 38(3), 299–313.
50.
ReedD.C.StoermerR.M. (2008). Towards an integrated model of moral functioning: An overview of the Special Issue. Journal of Moral Education, 37(3), 417–428.
51.
RestJ. (1983). Morality. In MussenP. (Series Ed.), FlavellJ.MarkhamE. (Vol. Eds.), Manual of child psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (pp. 556–629). New York, NY: Wiley.
52.
RestJ.R.TurielE.KohlbergL. (1969). Level of moral development as a determinant of preference and comprehension of moral judgments made by others. Journal of Personality, 37, 225–252.
53.
RestJ.NarvaezD.BebeauM.ThomaS. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
54.
RigbyK. (2004). Addressing bullying in school: Theoretical perspectives and their implications. School Psychology International, 25(3), 287–300.
55.
RomanowskiM. (2003). Lessons for life. American School Board Journal, 190(11), 32–35.
56.
RyanR.M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63(3), 397–427.
57.
RyanR.M.ConnellJ.P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.
58.
RyanR.M.DeciE.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
59.
RyanR.M.DeciE.L. (2007). Active human nature: Self-determination theory and the promotion and maintenance of sport, exercise, and health. In HaggerM.S.ChatzisarantisN.L. D. (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport, (pp. 1–19). Leeds, UK: Human Kinetics Europe Ltd.
60.
RyanR.M.DeciE.L. (2008). A self-determination theory approach to psychotherapy: The motivational basis for effective change. Canadian Psychology, 49, 186–193.
61.
RyanR.StillerM.J.LynchJ.H. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 226–249.
62.
SaundersE.J. (1993). Confronting academic dishonesty. Journal of Social Work Education, 29(2), 224–231.
63.
SharmaD.MohiteP. (2007). Teachers' perceptions of values education for children. In TanC.ChongK. (Eds.), Critical perspectives on values education in Asia (pp. 30–49). Singapore: Prentice Hall, Pearson Education South Asia.
64.
SimonC.A.CarrJ.R.McCulloughS.M.MorganS.J.OlesonT.ResselM. (2004). Gender, student perceptions, institutional commitments and academic dishonesty: Who reports in academic dishonesty cases?Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 75–90.
65.
SmithP.K. (2000). Bullying in schools: Lessons from two decades of research. Aggressive Behaviour, 26, 1–9.
66.
SnareyJ.R. (1985). Cross-cultural universality of social-moral development: A critical review of Kohlbergian research. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 202–232.
67.
TurielE. (2002). The culture of morality: Social development, context, and conflict. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68.
TurielE. (2008). Foreword. Journal of Moral Education, 37(3), 279–288.
69.
VallerandR.J.PelletierL.G.BlaisM.BriereN.M.SenecalC.VallieresE.F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017.
70.
VansteenkisteM.LensW.DeciE.L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19–31.
71.
VansteenkisteM.SimonsJ.LensW.SheldonK.M.DeciE.L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246–260.
72.
VishalacheB. (2007). Using real-life moral dilemmas in moral education for secondary schools. In TanC.ChongK. (Eds.), Critical perspectives on values education in Asia (pp. 124–137). Singapore: Prentice Hall, Pearson Education South Asia.
73.
WilliamsG.C.DeciE.L. (1998). The importance of supporting autonomy in medical education. Annals of Internal Medicine, 129, 303–308.
74.
WringeC. (2006). Moral education: Beyond the teaching of right and wrong. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
75.
ZhaoZ.TanC. (2007). Citizenship education in mainland China at a crossroads. In TanC.ChongK. (Eds.), Critical perspectives on values education in Asia (pp. 124–137). Singapore: Prentice Hall, Pearson Education South Asia.
