The purpose of this study was to understand how children use meta-cognition in their everyday problem-solving, particularly making monetary decisions. A particular focus was to identify components of meta-cognition, such as regulation of cognition and knowledge of cognition observed in children's monetary decision-making process, the roles of meta-cognition in children's monetary decisionmaking process, and the emerging factors that help to explain children's monetary decision-making processes. Data were collected from 136 mixed ability fifth-grade students (typically 10 years of age) from six different government primary schools in Singapore through focus group and one-to-one interviews. Using grounded theory, it was found that children's monetary decision-making is a complex process, that children often reflect upon unwise decisions and unpleasant experiences, and that parental involvement was an influential factor in their children's decision-making.
AbelsonR.P.LeviA. (1985). Decision making and decision theory. In LindzeyG.AronsonE. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 231–309). New York, NY: Random House.
2.
BakerL. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 3–38.
3.
BakerL.BrownA. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In PearsonP.D.KamilM.BarrR.MosenthalP. (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 353–394). New York, NY: Longman.
4.
BathaK.CarrollM. (2007). Metacognitive training aids decision making. Australian Journal of Psychology, 59(2), 64–69.
5.
BereiterC.ScardamaliaM. (2006). Education for the Knowledge Age. In AlexanderP.A.WinneP.H. (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 695–713). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
BergC.A.StroughJ.CalderoneK.S.SansoneC.WeirC. (1998). The role of problem definitions in understanding age and context effects on strategies for solving everyday problems. Psychology and Aging, 13(1), 29–44.
7.
BrownA.L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In SpiroR.J.BruceB.C.BrewerW.F. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 453–479). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
BrownJ.S.CollinsA.DuguidP. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
9.
ByrnesJ.P. (1998). The nature and development of decision making: A self-regulated model. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
ByrnesJ.MillerD.ReynoldsM. (1999). Learning to make good decisions: A self-regulated perspective. Child Development, 70(5), 1121–1140.
11.
CiancioloA.T.GrigorenkoE.L.JarvinL.GilG.DrebotM.E.SternburgR.J. (2006). Practical intelligence and tacit knowledge: Advancements in the measurement of developing expertise. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 235–253.
12.
CreswellJ.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
CreswellJ.W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
14.
CrossD.R.ParisS.G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children's metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 131–142.
15.
DavidsonJ.E.SternbergR.J. (1998). Smart problem solving: How metacognition helps. In HackerD.J.DunloskyJ.GraesserA.C. (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 47–68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
EversonH.T.TobiasS. (1998). The ability to estimate knowledge and performance in college: A metacognitive analysis. Instructional Science, 26, 65–79.
GardnerH. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York, NY: Basic.
19.
GummerumM.KellerM.TakezawaM.MataJ. (2008). To give or not to give: Children's and adolescents' sharing and moral negotiations in economic decision situations. Child Development, 79(3), 562–576.
20.
HelwigC.KimS. (1999). Children's evaluations of decision-making procedures in peer, family, and school contexts. Child Development, 70(2), 502–512.
21.
HennesseyM.G. (1999, August). Probing the dimensions of metacognition: Implications for conceptual change teaching-learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.
22.
HennesseyM.G. (2003). Metacognitive aspects of students' reflective discourse: Implications for intentional conceptual teaching and learning. In SinatraG.M.PintrichP.R. (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 103–132). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
HongN.S.JonassenD.H.McGeeS. (2003). Predictors of well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in an astronomy simulation. Journal of Science Teaching, 40(1), 6–33.
24.
JacobsJ.E.ParisS.G. (1987). Children's metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 255–278.
25.
Johnson-LairdP.N. (1982). Thinking as a skill. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 1–29.
26.
JonassenD.H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.
27.
JonassenD.H. (2004). Learning to solve problems: An instructional design guide. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28.
JonassenD.H. (2007). What makes scientific problems difficult? In JonassenD.H. (Ed.), Learning to solve complex scientific problems (pp. 3–23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
KitchnerK.S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemistic cognition: A three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26, 222–232.
32.
LeeC.B.TeoT.BerginD. (2009). Children's use of metacognition in solving everyday problem: An initial study from an Asian context. Australian Educational Researcher Journal, 36(3), 89–104.
33.
McGuiganL.QualterA.SchillingM. (1993). Children, science and learning. Investigating, 9(4), 23–25.
34.
McLainK.V. M.GridleyB.E.McIntoshD. (1991). Value of a scale used to measure metacognitive reading processes. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 81–87.
OsanaH.P.TuckerB.J.BennettT. (2003). Exploring adolescent decision making about equity: Ill-structured problem solving in social studies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 357–383.
37.
PalinscarA.M.BrownD.A. (1987). Enhancing instructional time through attention to metacognition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 66–75.
38.
RennieL.J.JarvisT. (1995). Children's choice of drawings to communicate their ideas about technology. Research in Science Education, 25(3), 239–252.
39.
SchrawG. (1994). The effects of metacognitive knowledge on local and global monitoring. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 143–154.
SchrawG.NietfeldJ. (1998). A further test of the general monitoring skill hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 236–248.
42.
SinnottJ.D. (1989). A model for solution of ill-structured problems: Implications for everyday and abstract problem solving. In SinnottJ.D. (Ed.), Everyday problem solving: Theory and applications (pp. 72–99). New York, NY: Praeger.
43.
SperlingR.A.HowardB.C.MillerL.A.MurphyC. (2002). Measures of children's knowledge and regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 51–79.
44.
SperlingR.A.HowardB.C.StaleyR.DuBoisN. (2004). Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs. Education Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 117–139.
45.
SternbergR.J. (2005). The theory of successful intelligence. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 39(2), 189–202.
46.
StipekD.FeilerR.DanielsD.MilburnS. (1995). Effects of different instructional approaches on young children's achievement and motivation. Child Development, 66, 209–223.
47.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990) Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London, UK: Sage.
48.
SwansonH.L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 306–314.
49.
VeenmanM. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: What can be learned from multi-method designs. In ArteltC.MoschnerB. (Eds.), Lernstrategien und Metakognition. Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis (pp. 77–100). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
50.
VeenmanM.van Hout-WoltersB.AfflerbachP. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14.
