Big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE) research has demonstrated that academic self-concept is negatively affected by attending high-ability schools. This article examines data from large, representative samples of 15-year-olds from each Australian state, based on the three Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) databases that focus on different subject domains: reading (2000), mathematics (2003) and science (2006). The overarching research question is whether the size or direction of the BFLPE is moderated by any of a total of 67 moderators (for example ability, study methods, motive, social constructs and Australian states) that were considered. The data showed consistent support for the BFLPE across all Australian states for all three databases. None of the constructs examined moderated the BFLPE and this finding was consistent across states. In conclusion, the BFLPE is remarkably robust in Australia and the study findings generalised well across Australian states and across all moderators investigated.
BoekaertsM. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161–186.
2.
BongM.SkaalvikE.M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really?Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40.
3.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
ColemanJ.M.FultsB.A. (1985). Special class placement, level of intelligence, and the self-concept of gifted children: A social comparison perspective. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 7–11.
5.
DweckC.S.LeggettE. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.
6.
GinsburgG.S.BronsteinP. (1993). Family factors related to children's intrinsic/extrinsic motivational orientation and academic performance. Child Development, 64, 1461–1474.
7.
GottfriedA.E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(6), 631–645.
8.
GottfriedA.E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 525–538.
9.
GuayF.LaroseS.BoivinM. (2004). Academic self-concept and educational attainment level: A ten-year longitudinal study. Self and Identity, 3(1), 53–68.
10.
HardreP.L.ReeveJ. (2003). A motivational model of rural students' intentions to persist in, versus drop out of, high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 347–356.
11.
HoxJ. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
HuguetP.DumasF.MarshH.W.RegnerI.WheelerL.SulsJ.SeatonM.NezlekJ. (2009). Clarifying the role of social comparison in the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE): An integrative study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 156–170.
13.
JohnsonD.W.JohnsonR.T. (1975). Learning together and alone; cooperation, competition, and individualization. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
14.
MarshH.W. (1991). Failure of high ability schools to deliver academic benefits commensurate with their students' ability levels. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 445–480.
15.
MarshH.W. (2004). Negative effects of school-average achievement on academic self-concept: A comparison of the big-fish-little-pond effect across Australian states and territories. Australian Journal of Education, 48(1), 5–26.
16.
MarshH.W.ChessorD.CravenR.RocheL. (1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 285–319.
17.
MarshH.W.HauK. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond-effect on academic self-concept. A cross-cultural (26 country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58(5), 364–376.
18.
MarshH.W.HauK.ArteltC.BaumertJ.PescharJ.L. (2006). OECD's brief self-report measure of educational psychology's most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6(4), 311–360.
19.
MarshH.W.LüdtkeO.RobitzschA.TrautweinU.AsparouhovT.MuthenB.NagengastB. (2009). Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: Integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 764–802.
20.
MarshH.W.PeartN.D. (1988). Competitive and cooperative physical fitness training programs for girls: Effects on physical fitness and multidimensional self-concept. Journal of Sport & Exercise, 10(4), 390–407.
21.
MarshH.W.PerryC. (2005). Self-concept contributes to winning gold medals: Causal ordering of self-concept and elite swimming performance. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 27(1), 71–91.
22.
MarshH.W.YeungA.S. (1997a). Causal effects of academic self-concept on academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 41–54.
23.
MarshH.W.YeungA.S. (1997b). Coursework selection: Relations to academic self-concept and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 691–720.
24.
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training, and Youth Affairs. (2008). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Melbourne: Author.
25.
MultonK.D.BrownS.D.LentR.W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(1), 30–38.
RaudenbushS.W.BrykA.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Application and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
RaudenbushS.W.BrykA.S.CongdonR. (2005). HLM6 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
34.
RavenscroftS.P. (1997). In support of cooperative learning. Issues in Accounting Education, 12(1), 187–190.
35.
ReumanD.A. (1989). How social comparison mediates the relation between ability-grouping practices and students' achievement expectancies in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 178–189.
36.
SeatonM.MarshH.W.CravenR.G. (2010). Big-fish-little-pond-effect: Generalizability and moderation—two sides of the same coin. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 390–433.
37.
SlavinR.E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement?Psychological Bulletin, 94(3), 429–445.
38.
SwalanderL.TaubeK. (2007). Influences of family based prerequisites, reading attitude, and self-regulation on reading ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 206–230.
39.
ValasH.SovikN. (1993). Variables affecting students' intrinsic motivation for school mathematics: Two empirical studies based on Deci and Ryan's theory on motivation. Learning and Instruction, 3, 281–298.
40.
ValentineJ.C.DuBoisD.L. (2005). Effects of self-beliefs on academic achievement and vice versa. In MarshH.W.CravenR.G.McInerneyD. (Eds.), The New Frontiers of Self Research (pp. 53–77). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
41.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ.S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.
42.
XuM. (2010). Frame of reference effects in academic self-concept: An examination of the big-fish-little-pond effect and the internal/external frame of reference model for Hong Kong adolescents (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
43.
ZimmermanB.J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In SchunkD.H.ZimmermanB.J. (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3–21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
