Various explanations and solutions have been proposed over the last decade in relation to the implications of students' apparent lack of engagement with middle years schooling in Australia. This article reports on responses to a questionnaire by 333 Year 8 students (aged about 13, in the second year of high school) on perceptions of factors relating to their engagement with the academic curriculum. While the majority of students reported a strong sense of the importance of, and opportunities in, schooling, and saw English, mathematics and science connected to those opportunities, this orientation was not matched by corresponding positive engagement with these same subjects. There was diversity in the responses of students, and it is recommended that schools take steps to identify individual students' perceptions of factors influencing their engagement, and where appropriate, deal with those perceptions.
AmesC. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271.
2.
AppleM.BeaneJ. (1999). Democratic schools: Lessons from the chalk face. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
3.
Australian Curriculum Studies Association. (1996). From alienation to engagement: Opportunities for reform in the middle years of schooling, 1–3, Canberra: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.
4.
BoekaertsM. (1998). Coping in context, goal frustration and goal ambivalence in relation to academic and interpersonal goals. In FrydenbergE. (Ed.), Learning to cope: Developing as a person in complex societies (pp. 175–197). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
BoekaertsM.CascallarE. (2006). How far have we moved toward integration of theory and practice in self-regulation?Educational Psychology Review, 18, 199–210.
6.
CummingJ. (1996). From alienation to engagement. Canberra: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.
7.
DelpitL. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280–298.
8.
DesforgesC.CockburnA. (1987). Understanding the mathematics teacher: A study of practice in first schools. London: Palmer Press.
9.
DoyleW. (1986). Classroom organisation and management. In WittrockM.C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 392–431). New York: Macmillan.
10.
DweckC.S. (2000). Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
11.
ElliotA.J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169–189.
12.
FredericksJ.A.BlumfieldP.C.ParisA.H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–110.
13.
GreeneJ.AzevedoR. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin's model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77(3) 334–372.
14.
HunterL. (2007). Machinations in the middle. Australian Educational Researcher, 34(2), 1–6.
15.
LukeA.ElkinsJ.WeirK.LandR.CarringtonV.DoleS.PendergastD.KapitzkeC.van KraayenoordC.MoniK.McIntoshA.MayerD.BahrM.HunterL.ChadbourneR.BeanT.AlvermannD.StevenL. (2003). Beyond the middle: A report about literacy and numeracy development of target group students in the middle years of schooling, 1. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training.
16.
MainK.BryerF. (2007). A framework for research into Australian middle school practice. Australian Educational Researcher, 34(2), 91–105.
17.
MartinA.MarshH. (2006). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A construct validity approach. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 267–281.
18.
OnyxJ.WoodC.BullenP.OsburnL. (2005). Social capital: A rural youth perspective. Youth Studies Australia, 24(4), 21–27.
19.
OysermanD.TerryK.BybeeD. (2002). A possible selves intervention to enhance school involvement. Journal of Adolescence, 25, 313–326.
20.
PendergastD.FlanaganR.LandR.BahrM.MitchellJ.WeirK.NoblettG.CainM.MisichT.CarringtonV.SmithJ. (2005). Developing lifelong learners in the middle years of schooling. Canberra: Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training, and Youth Affairs Report.
21.
PintrichP.de GrootE. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.
22.
SullivanP.A.McDonoughA.M. (2007). Eliciting positive student motivation for learning mathematics. Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice—Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 698–707. Adelaide: MERGA.
23.
SullivanP.McDonoughA.PrainV. (2005). Student engagement in the middle years: Describing influences and possible teacher actions. Proceedings of the Australian Association of Research in Education Annual Conference. Sydney, November. Retrieved May 19, 2009, from http://www.aare.edu.au/05pap/sul05134.pdf
24.
SullivanP.TobiasS.McDonoughA. (2006). Perhaps the decision of some students not to engage in learning mathematics in school is deliberate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(1), 81–99.
25.
TadichB.DeedC.CampbellC.PrainV. (2007). Student engagement in the middle years: A Year 8 case study. Issues in Educational Research, 17. Retrieved May 19, 2009, from http://www.iier.org.au/iier17/tadich.html
26.
TaylorJ.NelmsL. (2008). Life chances at 16: Life stage study stage8, Melbourne: Brotherhood of St Laurence.
27.
ZimmermannB. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
