Through the voices of students and teachers at an elite coeducational private school and a school situated in a low socio-economic area, this paper explores the potential consequences for students of school alignment or misalignment with the structural imperatives of the broader Queensland senior secondary education system. Although the schools are situated within the same system, the achievement expectations and practices of the two schools were vastly different. Moreover, the structuring features of the private school ‘field’ aligned more closely with the official processes and expectations of the Queensland assessment regime than did those at the other school. School differences in the students' understandings of and investments in their education were observed in relation to differences in school practice.
BallS. (2000). Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: Towards the performative society?Australian Educational Researcher, 27(2), 1–24.
2.
BallS. (2003). The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
3.
BernsteinB. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse, vol. IV, Class, codes and control. London: Routledge.
4.
Board of Senior Secondary School Studies (1995). Technical features of the OP/FP system. Brisbane: Department of Education, Queensland.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research of the sociology of education, 241–258. Westport: Greenwood.
7.
BourdieuP. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25.
8.
BourdieuP. (1990). Sociology in question. Cambridge: Polity Press.
9.
BrookerR.MacdonaldD. (1999). Did we hear you?: Issues of student voice in a curriculum innovation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(1), 83–97.
10.
CharmazK. (2000). Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In DenzinN.K.LincolnY.S. (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research, 509–535. London: Sage.
11.
ColeD.A.MartinJ.M.PeekeL.A.SeroczynskiA.D.FierJ. (1999). Children's over and underestimation of academic competence: A longitudinal study of gender differences, depression and anxiety. Child Development, 70(2), 459–473.
12.
CummingJ.J.MaxwellG.S. (2004). Assessment in Australian schools: current practice and trends. Assessment in Education, 11(1), 89–108.
13.
Education Queensland (2002). Queensland the smart state—education and training reforms for the future, a white paper. Brisbane: Queensland Government.
14.
EdwardsT. (2002). A remarkable sociological imagination. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(4), 527–535.
15.
EvansJ.RichE.DaviesB.AllwoodR. (2005). The embodiment of learning: What the sociology of education doesn't say about risk in going to school. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 15(2), 129–148.
16.
EvansJ.RichE.HolroydR. (2004). Disordered eating and disordered schooling: What schools do to middle class girls. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(2), 123–142).
17.
GibbsG.R. (2002). Qualitative data analysis: Explorations with NVivo. Buckingham: Open University Press.
18.
GorardS.TaylorC.FitzJ. (2003). Schools, markets and choice politics. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
HarrisA.RansonS. (2005). The contradictions of policy: disadvantage and achievement. British Educational Research Journal, 31(5), 571–587.
21.
Sui-ChuE. HoWillmsJ.D. (1996). Effects of parental involvement on eighth-grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 69(2), 126–144.
22.
HodgeG.M.McCormickJ.ElliotR. (1997). Examination-induced distress in a public examination at the completion of secondary schooling. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 185–197.
23.
HurshD. (2007). Assessing no child left behind and the rise of neoliberal education policies. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 493–518.
24.
JeffreyB. (2002). Performativity and primary teacher relations. Journal of Education Policy, 17(5), 531–546.
25.
KelchtermansG. (2005). Teachers' emotions in educational reforms: Self-understanding, vulnerable commitment and micropolitical literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 995–1006.
26.
KenwayJ.BullenE. (2001). Consuming children: Education—entertainment—advertising. Buckingham: Open University Press.
27.
KnappM.S.WoolvertonS. (2004). Social class and schooling. In BanksJ.A.BanksC.A. McGee (Eds), Handbook of research on multicultural education, 656–681. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
LockerJ.CroperlyM. (2004). Anxiety, depression and self-esteem in secondary school children: An investigation into the impact of standard assessment tests (SATs) and other important school examinations. School Psychology International, 25(3), 333–345.
29.
MastersG.N. (2006). National curriculum collaboration in senior secondary schooling. Curriculum Perspectives, 26(3), 56–60.
30.
MeadmoreD.MeadmoreP. (2004). The boundlessness of performativity in elite Australian schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 25(3), 375–387.
31.
PitmanJ.O'BrienJ.McCollowJ. (2002). A system combining school-based assessment and cross-curriculum testing considered in the context of some key debates in the educational assessment literature. Level 5 Appendices in J. Pitman, The senior certificate: A new deal. Brisbane: Department of Education.
ReayD. (1998). ‘Always knowing’ and ‘never being sure’: familial and institutional habituses and higher education choice. Journal of Education Policy, 13(4), 519–529.
34.
ReayD.LuceyH. (2003). The limits of ‘choice’: children and inner city schooling. Sociology, 37(1), 121–142.
35.
ReidA. (2006). National curriculum consistency. Curriculum Perspectives, 26(3), 55.
36.
TeeseR. (1998). Curriculum hierarchy, private schooling, and the segmentation of Australian secondary education, 1947–1985. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(3), 401–417.
37.
TeeseR.PoleselJ. (2003). Undemocratic schooling: Equity and quality in mass secondary education in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
38.
ThompsonP. (2002). Schooling the rustbelt kids. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
