Through the use of narrative portraits this paper discusses social class and identity, as working-class university students perceive them. With government policy encouraging wider participation rates from under-represented groups of people within the university sector, working-class students have found themselves to be the objects of much research. Working-class students are, for the most part, studied as though they are docile bodies, unable to participate in the construction of who they are, and working-class accounts of university experiences are quite often compared to the middle-class norms. This paper explores how working-class students see themselves within the university culture. Working-class students' voices and stories form the focus of this paper, in which the language of ‘disadvantage’ is dealt with and the ideologies of class identity explored.
AlexanderB.AndersonG.GallegosB. (2005). Performance theories in education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
ArcherL.HutchingsM.RossA. (2003). Higher education and social class. Issues of exclusion and inclusion. London: Routledge Falmer.
3.
AronowitzS. (2003). How class works: Power and social movement. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4.
BallS. (2006a). The necessity and violence of theory. Discourse, 27(1), 3–10.
5.
BallS. (2006b). Discipline and chaos: The new right and discourses of derision. In BallS. (Ed.), Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. New York: Routledge.
6.
BourdieuP.PasseronJ.-C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
BrittonC.BaxterA. (1999). Becoming a mature student: Gendered narratives of the self. Gender and Education, 11(2), 179–193.
10.
BrodkeyL. (1992). Articulating poststructural theory in research on literacy. In BeachR. (Ed.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (pp. 293–318). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
11.
CalhounC. (1996). Social theory and the politics of identity. Massachusetts: Blackwell.
12.
CarspeckenP. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.
13.
ClancyP.GoastellecG. (2007). Exploring access and equity in higher education: Policy and performance in a comparative aspect. Higher Education Quarterly, 61(2), 136–154.
DumaisS. (2002). Cultural capital, gender, and school success: The role of habitus. Journal of Sociology of Education, 75(1), 44–68.
16.
GramsciA. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
17.
GreenA. (2003). Learning to tell stories: Social class, narratives, and pedagogy. Modern Language Studies, 33(1/2), 80–89.
18.
hooksB. (1994). Teaching to transgress. New York: Routledge.
19.
hooksB. (2000). Where we stand: Class matters. New York: Routledge.
20.
LareauA. (2000). Home advantage: Social class and parental involvement in elementary education. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
21.
McGregorC. (1997). Class in Australia: Who says Australia has no class system? (pp. 447–505). Melbourne: Penguin Books.
22.
MacKenzieL. (1998). A pedagogy of respect: Teaching as an ally of working-class college students. In ShepardA.McMillanJ.TateG. (Eds), Coming to class: Pedagogy and the social class of teachers. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
23.
McLarenP. (1995). Critical pedagogy and predatory culture. London: Routledge.
24.
McLarenP. (2005). Foreword. In AlexanderB.AndersonG.GallegosB. (Eds), Performance theories in education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
McLarenP.FarahmandpurR. (2005a). Teaching against global capitalism and the new imperialism: A critical pedagogy. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
26.
McLarenP.FarahmandpurR. (2005b). Teaching against globalization and the new imperialism: Toward a revolutionary pedagogy. In P. McLaren & Companeras Y Comaneros. Red seminars: Radical excursions into educational theory, cultural politics, and pedagogy. New Jersey: Hampton Press.
27.
MelucciA. (1996). The playing self: Person and meaning in the planetary society. Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
MilnerA. (1999). Core cultural concepts: Class. London: Sage.
29.
MunnsG.NanlohyP.ThomasM. (2000). Let them eat caviar: Alternative pathways for university students attending to ‘unfinished business‘. Asia—Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 28(2), 166–177.
30.
PeckB. (2001). The poor stay poor and the rich stay rich [Electronic version]. Issues In Educational Research, 11(2), 45–64. Retrieved 10 October, 2007, from http://www.iier.org.au/iier.html
31.
PrestonJohn. (2007). Whiteness and class in education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
32.
QuantzR. (1992). On critical ethnography with some postmodern considerations. In LeCompteM.MilroyW.PreissleJ. (Eds), The handbook of qualitative research in education. San Diego: Academic Press.
33.
RobbinsD. (1993). The practical importance of Bourdieu's analyses of higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 18(2), 151–163.
34.
ReayD.DavidM.BallS. (2001). Making a difference? Institutional habituses and higher education choice. Sociological Research Online.5(4). Retrieved 10 October, 2007, from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/4/reay.html
35.
SavageM. (2003). A new class paradigm? Review Essay. British Journal of Sociology, 24(4), 535–541.
36.
ShacklockG.SmythJ. (1997). Conceptualising and capturing voices in dropping out research: Methodological issues. Unpublished paper for the Students Completing Schooling Project, Flinders Institute for the Study of Teaching, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide.
37.
ShieldsC.BishopR.MazawiA. (2005). Pathologizing practices: The impact of deficit thinking on education. New York: Peter Lang.
38.
SkeggsB. (1997). Formations of class and gender. London: Sage.
39.
SmithE. (2003). Understanding underachievement: An investigation into the differential attainment of secondary school pupils. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(5), 575–586.
40.
SmythJ.AngusL.DownB.McInerneyP. (2006). Critical ethnography for school and community renewal around social class differences affecting learning. Learning Communities: International Journal of Learning in Social Contexts, 3, 121–152.
41.
WebbJ.SchiratoT.DanaherG. (2002). Understanding Bourdieu. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
42.
WeedonC. (1999). Feminism, theory and the politics of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
43.
WexlerP. (1992). Becoming somebody: Toward a social psychology of school. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
44.
WilliamsonB. (1981). Class bias. In PiperD.W. (Ed.), Is higher education fair? (pp. 17–39) Guilford, UK: SRHE.
