In response to concerns about boys' academic underachievement as well as the international gender imbalance in our teaching force composition, a call has been made to hire more male teachers and practice ‘boy-friendly’ pedagogy. Our investigation of effects of male reading teachers and use of computer-based books demonstrated their ability to de-feminise boys' views of reading but no differential effects were evident on boys' reading achievement or reader self-perceptions between boys taught by males or by females, whether or not they use technology in their reading practices.
AdamsM. (1990). Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
AllanJ. (1993). Male elementary teachers: Experiences and perspectives. In WilliamsC. (Ed.), Doing ‘woman's work’: Men in non-traditional occupations. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
3.
AllowayN.GilbertP.HendersonR. (2003). Boys performing English. Gender and Education, 15(4), 351–364.
4.
Bangert-DrownsR.KulikR.KulikC. (1985). Effectiveness of computer-based education in secondary schools. Journal of Computer-based Instruction, 12, 59–68.
5.
BaronJ. (1996). Sexism attitudes towards reading in the adult learner population. ERIC Reproduction Document No. ED393092. New Jersey: J. Baron.
6.
BasowS. (1992). Gender stereotypes and roles. California: Brooks/Cole.
7.
BoothD. (2002). Even hockey players read. Portland, ME: Pembroke Publishers.
8.
BradleyH. (1999). Gender and power in the workplace: Analysing the impact of economic change. London: Macmillan.
9.
BrophyJ.E. (1985). Interactions of male and female students with male and female teachers. In WilkinsonL.MarettC. (Eds), Gender influences in classroom interactions. New York: Academic Press.
10.
ButlerD.ChristiansonR. (2003). Mixing and matching: The effect on student performance of teaching assistants of the same gender. Political Science and Politics, 36, 781–786.
11.
CampbellN.PerryK. (1989, March). Sex and ethnic group differences in high school students' computer attitudes and computer abilities. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
12.
CarringtonB.SkeltonC. (2003). Re-thinking role models: Equal opportunities in teacher recruitment in England and Wales. Journal of Educational Policy, 12(3), 253–265.
13.
CarringtonB.TymmsP.MerrellC. (2005). Role models, school improvement and the ‘gender gap’—Do men bring out the best in boys and women the best in girls? Paper presented at the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction conference, University of Nicosia, Cyprus.
14.
ClarkR. (1985). Confounding in educational computing research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1(2), 137–148.
15.
ConnellR. (1996). Teaching the boys: New research on masculinity, and gender strategies for schools. Teachers College Record, 98(2), 206–236.
16.
CoulterR.McNayM. (1993). Exploring men's experiences as elementary school teachers. Canadian Journal of Education, 18, 398–413.
17.
Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. (2001). Measuring up: The performance of Canada's youth in reading, mathematics and science. The OECD PISA study. Toronto: Council of Ministers of Education, Canada.
18.
Council of Ministers of Education Canada (2006). Education Indicators in Canada: Report of the Pan-Canadian Education Indicators Program. Catalogue number 81–582-XIE. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
19.
CummingsN. (1994). Eleventh graders view gender differences in reading and math. Journal of Reading, 38, 196–199.
DelamontS. (1990). Sex roles and the school. London: Routledge.
22.
DotyD.PopplewellS.ByersG. (2001). Inter-active CD-Rom storybooks and young readers' reading comprehension. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 374–384.
23.
EhrenbergR.GoldhaberD.BrewerD. (1995). Do teachers' race, gender and ethnicity matter? Evidence from the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 48, 547–561.
HenckW.MelnickS. (1995). The Reader Self-Perception Scale (RSPS): A new tool for measuring how children feel about themselves as readers. The Reading Teacher, 48, 470–482.
31.
HermineF. (1998). Gender differences in attitude toward reading in a sample of the Jewish community. ERIC reproduction document No. ED417378. New Jersey: F. Hermine.
32.
HessR.MiuraI. (1985). Gender differences in enrollment in computer camps and classes. Sex Roles, 13, 193–203.
33.
HoffertS.I.SandbergJ.F.2001. How American children spend their time. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63(3), 295–308.
34.
International ICT Literacy Panel. (2001). Digital transformation: A framework for ICT literacy. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
35.
JacobsJ.E.LanzaS.OsgoodD.W.EcclesJ.S.WigfieldA. (2002). Changes in children's self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527.
36.
KatzH.SokalL. (2003). Masculine literacy: One size does not fit all. Reading Manitoba24(1), 4–8.
37.
Lefever-DavisS.PearmanC. (2005). Early readers and electronic texts: CD-ROM storybook features that influence reading behaviors. The Reading Teacher, 58(5), 446–454.
38.
LewinC. (1996). Improving talking book software design: Emulating the supportive tutor. Bradford, UK: Centre for Information Technology in Education, Open University.
39.
LewisE.ButcherJ.DonnanP. (1999). Men in primary teaching: An endangered species? Retrieved 17 January 2008 from http://www.aare.au/99pap/but99238.htm
40.
McKennaE. (1997). Gender differences in reading attitudes. Unpublished master's thesis, Kean College of New Jersey. Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED407653.
41.
MancusD. (1992). Influences of male school teacher on children's stereotyping of teacher competence. Sex Roles, 26, 109–128.
42.
MartinA. (2003). Primary school boys' identity formation and the male role model: An exploration of sexual identity and gender identity in the UK through attachment theory. Sex Education, 3(3), 257–271.
43.
MartinA. (2005, 6 November). Wanted: Male teachers for young students. Chicago Tribune News, 1.
44.
MartinC.L. (1993). New directions for assessing children's gender knowledge. Developmental Review13,(2) 184–204.
45.
MartinC.L.HalversonC.F. (1981). A schematic processing model of gender typing in children. Child Development, 52, 1119–1132.
46.
MathewsK. (1996). The impact of CD-ROM storybooks on children's reading comprehension and attitudes. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5, 379–394.
47.
MillardE. (1997). Differently literate: Gender identity and the construction of the developing reader. Gender and Education, 9(1), 31–49.
48.
MillerB.V.KratochwillT.R. (1996). An evaluation of the paired reading program using competency-based training. School Psychology International, 17(3), 269–291.
49.
MillsM.MartinoW.LingardB. (2004). Attracting, recruiting and retaining male teachers: Policy issues in the male teacher debate. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(3), 355–369.
50.
MulhollandJ.HansenP. (2003). Men who become primary teachers: An early portrait. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 31(3), 213–224.
51.
MullisI.V. S.MartinM.O.GonzalezE.J.KennedyA.M. (2003). PIRLS 2001 international report: IEA's study of reading literacy achievement in primary schools. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
52.
NiemiecR.WalbergH. (1985). Computers and achievement in elementary schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1, 435–440.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2004). Learning for Tomorrow's World: First Results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD Publishing.
55.
Northern Alberta Reading Specialists' Council. 1991. Paired Reading: A reading practice approach. Kelowna: Filmwest.
56.
PearmanC. (2003). Effects of CR-ROM story books on the independent reading comprehension of second grade students. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas, 2003. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(07a), 2427.
57.
PottorffD.D.Phelps-ZientarskiD.SkoveraM.E. (1996). Gender perceptions of elementary and middle school students about literacy at school and at home. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29, 203–211.
ReynoldsR.E.TaylorM.A.SteffensenM.S.ShireyL.L.AndersonR.C. (1982) Cultural schemata and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(3), 353–366.
60.
SaxL. (2005). Why gender matters: What parents and teachers need to know about the emerging science of sex differences. New York: Doubleday
61.
ShapiroD. (1980). Primary children's attitudes toward reading in male and female teachers' classrooms: An exploratory study. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12(3), 155–157.
62.
SkeltonC. (2003). Male primary teachers and perceptions of masculinity. Educational Review, 55(2), 195–210.
63.
SmithM.WilhelmJ. (2002), Reading don't fix no Cheveys: Literacy in the lives of young men. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
64.
SokalL. (2002). Temporal issues in gender schema inventories. Canadian Journal of Infancy and Early Childhood, 9(2), 91–96.
65.
SokalL.KatzH. (2004, May). Do text genre and sex of reading model affect boys' views of reading as a feminine activity? Paper presented at the Congress of Social Sciences and Humanities conference, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
66.
SokalL.KatzH.AdkinsM.GrillsT.StewartC.PriddleG.Sych-YereniukA.Chochinov-HarderL. (2005). Factors affecting inner-city boys' reading: Are male teachers the answer?Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 14(1), 107–130.
67.
SokalL.MonetteJ.McBeyS.WojcikC. (2006). Factors affecting boys' reading gains. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
68.
StanovichK.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–406.
69.
Statistics Canada. (2003, 25 November). Education indicators in Canada (3rd edn). Publication Number 81–852-XPE. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
70.
SuttonR. (1991). Equity and computers in the schools: A decade of research. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 475–503.
71.
TinklinT.CroxfordL.DucklinA.FrameB. (2001). Gender and pupil performance in Scotland's schools. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Executive Education Department.
72.
ToppingK. (1987). Paired reading: A powerful technique for parent use. The Reading Teacher, 40, 608–614.
73.
WattH.M. G. (2004). Development of adolescents; self perceptions, values and task perceptions according to gender and domain in 7th through 11th grade Australian students. Child Development, 75, 1556–1574.
74.
WhitleyB. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analysis. Computers and Human Behaviour, 13, 1–22.
75.
WorthyJ.MoormanM.TurnerM. (1999). What Johnny likes to read is hard to find at school. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(1), 12–27.
