This article presents teachers' and children's views of the effectiveness of sound-field amplification intervention. The rating scale, Teacher Opinions re Performance in Classrooms (TOPIC) provided information on teacher perceptions regarding changes in student performance in unamplified ‘OFF’ and amplified ‘ON’ listening conditions. The teachers observed improvement in attention, communication strategies and classroom behaviour when the amplification systems were operating. The answers from questionnaires indicated a high level of satisfaction from both teachers and students following use of the systems. Less vocal strain was identified by the teachers to be a major benefit. The children reported that they could hear better, clearer or louder.
AllenL. (1993). Promoting the usefulness of classroom amplification equipment. Educational Audiology Monograph, 3, 32–34.
2.
AllenL. (1995, June). The effect sound-field amplification has on teacher vocal abuse problems. Paper presented at the Educational Audiology Association Biannual Convention, Lake Lure, NC.
AndersonK. (2001). Voicing concern about noisy classrooms. Educational Leadership, April, 77–9.
5.
ArnoldP.CanningD. (1999). Does classroom amplification aid comprehension?British Journal of Audiology, 33, 171–78.
6.
BergS.F. (1993). Acoustics and sound systems in schools. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
7.
CrandellC.SapienzaC.CurtisB. (1996). Effects of sound-field amplification on vocal pathology. Paper presented at the American Academy of Audiology annual meeting, Salt Lake City, UT.
8.
CrandellC.SmaldinoJ. (1994). An update of classroom acoustics for children with hearing impairment. The Volta Review, 96, 291–306.
9.
CrandellC.SmaldinoJ. (1995). Speech perception in the classroom. Sound-field FM amplification: Theory and practical applications. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
10.
CrandellC.SmaldinoJ.FlexerC. (Eds.) (1995). Sound-field FM amplification: Theory and practical applications. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
11.
CrandellC.SmaldinoJ.FlexerC. (1999). An overview of sound-field FM amplification. The Hearing Review, 6(6), 40–2.
12.
DaraiB. (2000). Using sound-field FM systems to improve literacy skills. Advance Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 10(27), 5–7.
13.
BrophyA. EriksAyukawaH. (1999). Alternatives in amplification: Use of sound-field FM systems in classrooms of Nunavik. Frequences, 11(1), 26–8.
14.
BrophyA. EriksCragoM.B. (1994). Transforming classroom discourse: An Inuit example. Language and Education, 8(3), 105–22.
15.
FlexerC. (2002). Rationale and use of sound field systems: An update. The Hearing Journal, 55(8), 10–18.
16.
FlexerC.BuieC.BrandyW. (1994). Making the grade with amplification in classrooms. Hearing Instruments, 45(10), 24–6.
17.
FlexerC.CrandellC.SmaldinoJ. (1995). Considerations and strategies for amplifying the classroom. In DanhauerJ.L. (Ed.), Soundfield FM amplification—Theory and practical applications. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
18.
FlexerC.BileyK. KempHinkleyA.HarkemaC.HolcombJ. (2002). Using sound-field systems to teach phonemic awareness to pre-schoolers. The Hearing Journal, 55(3), 38–44.
19.
GotaasC.StarrC. (1993). Vocal fatigue among teachers. Folia Phoniatr (Basel)45, 120–9.
20.
GraufN. (1994). Report on whole class amplification systems installed in Cape and Gulf schools. Cairns, Qld: Torres Strait, Cape and Gulf School Support Centre.
21.
HowardD. (1994). Culturally responsive classrooms: A way to assist Aboriginal students with hearing loss in urban schools. In HarrisS.MalinM. (Eds.), Aboriginal kids in urban classrooms (pp. 37–51). Darwin: Social Science Press.
22.
KearinsJ. (1985). Cross-cultural misunderstandings in education. In PrideJ.B. (Ed.), Cross-cultural encounters: Communication and mis-communication (pp. 65–79). Melbourne: River Seine Publications.
23.
MassieR. (2000). The effects of sound-field FM amplification on the communicative interactions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
24.
MassieR.DillonH. (2003). The educational impact of sound-field amplification in cross-cultural classrooms. Manuscript submitted for publication.
25.
MassieR.TheodorosD.ByrneD.McPhersonB.SmaldinoJ. (1999). The effects of sound-field amplification on the communicative interactions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology, 21(2), 93–109.
26.
MassieR.TheodorosD.ByrneD.McPhersonB.SmaldinoJ. (2002, May). Differences in communication outcomes when utilising sound-field FM amplification in the classrooms of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. Paper presented at the 26th International Congress of Audiology, Melbourne, Australia.
27.
NelsonD.G.NelsonD.K. (1997). Teacher and student satisfaction with freefield FM amplification systems. The Volta Review, 99(3), 133–70.
28.
NelsonD.G.SchmidtM. (1993). Take anything else, but leave my classroom FM system. Perspectives in Education and Deafness, 12, 8–11.
29.
NelsonP.B.SoliS. (2000). Acoustical barriers to learning: Children at risk in every classroom. Language, Speech, Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 356–61.
30.
NienhuysT.G.BurnipL. (1988). Conductive hearing loss and the Aboriginal child at school. Australian Teacher of the Deaf, 28, 5–17.
31.
PicardM.BradleyJ.S. (2001). Revisiting speech interference in classrooms. Audiology, 40, 221–44.
32.
RobsonC. (1993). Real world research—A resource for social scientists and practitioners—researchers. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
33.
RosenbergG.Blake-RahterP. (1995). Sound-field amplification: A review of the literature. In CrandellC.SmaldinoJ.FlexorC. (Eds.), Sound-field FM amplification: Theory and practical applications (pp. 107–23). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
34.
RosenbergG.Blake-RahterP.HeavnerJ.AllenL.RedmondB.PhillipsJ.StigersK. (1999). Improving classroom acoustics (ICA): A three-year FM sound-field classroom amplification study. Journal of Educational Audiology, 7, 8–28.
35.
SapienzaC.CrandellC.CurtisB. (1999). Effects of sound-field frequency modulation amplification on reducing teachers' sound pressure level in the classroom. Journal of Voice, 13(3), 375–81.
36.
SiebertM. (1999, February 7). Educators often struck by voice ailments. The Des Moines Register, p. 4.
37.
SmithE.GrayS.DoveH.KirchnerL.HerasH. (1997). Frequency and effects of teachers' voice problems. Journal of Voice, 11(1), 81–7.
38.
TitzeI.R.LemkeJ.MontequinD. (1996). Populations in the US workforce who rely on voice as a primary tool of trade. NCVS Status and Progress Report, 10, 127–32.
