We explore the impact of student gender, teacher gender, and their interaction on academic motivation and engagement for 964 junior and middle high school students. According to the gender-stereotypic model, boys fare better academically in classes taught by males and girls fare better in classes taught by females. The gender-invariant model suggests that the academic motivation and engagement of boys and girls is the same for men and women teachers. We also examine the relative contribution of student-, class-, and school-level factors, finding that most variation was at the individual student level. Of the statistically significant main effects for gender, most favoured girls. In support of the gender-invariant model, academic motivation and engagement does not significantly vary as a function of their teacher's gender, and in terms of academic motivation and engagement, boys do not fare any better with male teachers than female teachers.
AinleyJ.LonsdaleM. (2000). Non-attendance at school. Report to the Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
2.
AustralianLabor Party. (2004). Making every day Father's Day: More male role models for boys. Policy Document. Canberra: Author.
3.
CollinsC.KenwayJ.McLeodJ. (2000). Factors influencing the educational performance of males and females in school and their initial destinations after leaving school. Canberra: Department of Education, Training, and Youth Affairs.
4.
ConnellJ.P. (1985). A new multidimensional measure of children's perceptions of control. Child Development, 56, 1018–1041.
5.
Department of Education, Training, and Youth Affairs (DETYA). (2000). Submission to the House of Representatives Standing Committee: Inquiry into the education of boys. Canberra: AGPS.
6.
DudaJ.L. (2001). Achievement goal research in sport: Pushing the boundaries and clarifying some misunderstandings. In RobertsG.C. (Ed.), Advances in motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 129–182). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
HarterS.WhitesellN.R.KowalskiP. (1992). Individual differences in the effects of educational transitions on young adolescent's perceptions of competence and motivational orientation. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 777–807.
9.
HillP.W.RoweK.J. (1996). Multilevel modelling in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 1–34.
10.
House of Representatives Standing Committee on Education and Training. (2002). Boys: Getting it right. Canberra: Author.
JacobsJ.E.LanzaS.OsgoodD.W.EcclesJ.S.WigfieldA. (2002). Changes in children's self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one though twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527.
LingardB.MartinoW.MillsM.BahrM. (2002). Addressing the educational needs of boys. Report to Department of Education, Science and Training. Canberra: AGPS.
15.
MarksG.N.FlemingN. (1999). Early school learning in Australia: Findings from the 1995 Year 9 LSAY report. LSAY Research Report No. 11. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
16.
MartinA.J. (2001). The Student Motivation Scale: A tool for measuring and enhancing motivation. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 11, 1–20.
17.
MartinA.J. (2002). Improving the educational outcomes of boys. Report to ACT Department of Education, Youth and Family Services. Canberra: AGPS.
18.
MartinA.J. (2003). The Student Motivation Scale: Further testing of an instrument that measures school students' motivation. Australian Journal of Education, 47(1), 88–106.
19.
MartinA.J. (2005). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. Manuscript submitted for publication.
20.
MartinA.J.MarshH.W.WilliamsonA.DebusR.L. (2003). Self-handicapping, defensive pessimism, and goal orientation: A qualitative study of university students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 617–628.
21.
MidgleyC.ArunkumarR.UrdanT.C. (1996). ‘If I don't do well tomorrow, there's a reason’: Predictors of adolescent's use of academic self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 423–434.
22.
MidgleyC.MaehrM.HicksL.RoesserR.UrdanT.AndermanE.KaplanA.ArunkumarR.MiddletonM. (1997). Patterns of adaptive learning survey (PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
23.
MidgleyC.UrdanT. (1995). Predictors of middle school students' use of self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Early Adolescence, 15, 389–411.
24.
MillerR.B.GreeneB.A.MontalvoG.P.RavindranB.NicholsJ.D. (1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others, and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 388–422.
25.
NichollsJ.G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
PattonM.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
PintrichP.R.DeGrootE. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.
28.
PintrichP.R.SmithD.A. F.GarciaT.McKeachieW.J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
29.
RasbashJ.SteeleF.BrowneW.ProsserB. (2004). A user's guide to MLwiN version 2.0. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
30.
RaudenbushS.W.BrykA.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
RoeserR.EcclesJ.S.SameroffA.J. (2000). School as a context for early adolescents' academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. Elementary School Journal, 100, 443–471.
32.
RoweK.J.RoweK.S. (2002). What matters most: Evidence-based findings of key factors affecting the educational experiences and outcomes for girls and boys throughout their primary and secondary schooling. Supplementary submission to House of Representatives Standing Committee on Education and Training: Inquiry into the Education of Boys. Canberra: AGPS.
33.
RuddockP. (2004). Government moves to address male teacher decline. Media release 186/2004. Canberra: Attorney General's Department.
34.
StrubeM.J. (1986). An analysis of the Self-Handicapping Scale. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 211–224.
35.
Weaver-HightowerM. (2003). The ‘boy turn’ in research on gender and education. Review of Educational Research, 73, 471–498.
