Gender differences in participation and performance at ‘high stakes’ examinations have received much public attention, which has often focused on mathematics and science subjects. This paper describes the innovative forms of assessment introduced into mathematics and science subjects within the Victorian Certificate of Education (VCE) system. Results from these subjects are examined for patterns of gender differences in participation and performance over the period 1994–1999. A larger proportion of males than females studied all the VCE science and mathematics subjects except Biology and Psychology over this period. Based on study scores, females, on average, out-performed males in almost all VCE science and mathematics subjects in nearly every year from 1994–1999. As exceptions to the patterns, males out-performed females in Chemistry and Mathematical Methods. Results from a general ability test are used to question the legitimacy of gender comparisons in subjects in which enrolment is no longer compulsory. The data do not support simplistic conclusions about gender differences in participation and performance.
AllenJ. R.BellE. J. (1996). Changing populations and changing results: Gender differences in senior studies 1987–95. Brisbane: Queensland Board of Senior Secondary School Studies.
2.
Australian Council of Deans of Science. (1999). Who is studying science? x(ACDS Occasional Paper No. 1). Melbourne: Author.
3.
BaeY.ChoyS.GeddesC.SableJ.SnyderT. (2000). Trends in educational equity of girls & women. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics (ED).
BrinkworthP. C. (1999). An exploration of gender differences in subject choice and beliefs among Year 12 students. In TruranJ. M.TruranK. M. (Eds.), Making the difference: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 106–113). Adelaide: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
6.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7.
CollinsC.KenwayJ.McLeodJ. (2000). Factors influencing the educational performance of males and females in school and their initial destinations after leaving school. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
8.
Commonwealth Schools Commission. (1975). Girls, school & society. Canberra: Author.
9.
CortisN.NewmarchE. (2000). Boys in schools: What's happening: Manning the next millennium. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.
10.
CoxP. (1996). SEX and CATs: Findings from a detailed statistical analysis. In ForgaszH.JonesT.LederG.LynchJ.MaguireK.PearnC. (Eds.), Mathematics: Making connections (pp. 354–361). Brunswick, Vic: Mathematical Association of Victoria.
11.
CoxP. (2000). Regional and gender differences in mathematics achievement. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 16(1), 22–29.
12.
DekkersJ.De LaeterJ. R. (1997). The changing nature of upper secondary school science subject enrolments. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 43(4), 35–41.
13.
DekkersJ.De LaeterJ. R. (2001). Enrolment trends in school science education in Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 487–500.
14.
DekkersJ.De LaeterJ. R.MaloneJ. A. (1991). Upper secondary school science and mathematics enrolment patterns in Australia, 1970–1989 (Key Centre Monograph Number 4). Perth: Curtin University of Technology.
15.
DekkersJ.MaloneJ. A. (2000). Mathematics enrolments in Australian upper secondary schools (1980–1999): Trends and implications. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 14(2), 49–57.
16.
DobsonI. R.CalderonA.J. (1999). Trends in science education: Learning, teaching and outcomes 1989–1997. Melbourne: Australian Council of Deans of Science.
17.
EllisH. (1894). Man and woman. London: Walter Scott.
18.
FeingoldA. (1992). Sex differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A new look at an old controversy. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 61–84.
19.
ForgaszH.J.LederG. C. (2001). The Victorian Certificate of Education: A gendered affair?Australian Educational Researcher, 28(2), 53–66.
20.
HaggertyS. M. (1991). Gender and school science: Achievement and participation in Canada. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 37(3), 195–208.
21.
HedgesL. V.FriedmanL. (1993). Computing gender difference effects in tails of distributions: The consequences of differences in tail size, effect size, and variance ratio. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 110–112.
22.
House of Representatives Standing Committee on Education and Training. (2002). Boys: Getting it right. Report on the inquiry into the education of boys. Canberra: AGPS.
23.
KeighdeyJ. V. (1999). Girls' participation in senior secondary science subjects and the implications for assessment. SASTA Journal, 99(1), 10–16.
24.
KimmelMichael. (2000). What about the boys?Wellesley Centers for Women Research Report, 21(2), 6–7.
25.
LederG. C.ForgaszH. J.SolarC. (1996). Research and intervention programs in mathematics education: A gendered issue. In BishopA.ClementsK.KeitelC.KilpatrickJ.LabordeC. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education, Part 2 (pp. 945–985). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
26.
LydeamoreJ. (1993). Gender equity in senior secondary school assessment (ESSSA) project. Adelaide: Department of Employment, Education and Training. (Publication restricted).
27.
MacCannR. (1995). Sex differences at the NSW Higher School Certificate after adjustment for the effects of differential selection. Australian Journal of Education, 39(2), 163–188.
28.
MaccobyE. E.JacklinC. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29.
MarksG. N.FlemingN.LongM.McMillanJ. (2000). Longitudinal surveys of Australian youth: Patterns of participation in Year 12 and higher education in Australia: Trends and issues (Research Report Number 17). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
30.
Ministerial Advisory Committee on Women and Girls. (1991). Working for gender justice in schools. Melbourne: Ministry of Education and Training, Victoria.
Ministry of Education Western Australia. (1991). Social justice in education: Policy guidelines for gender equity. Perth: Author.
33.
O'DohertyS. (1994). Inquiry into boys' education 1994: Challenges & opportunities: A discussion paper. Sydney: Ministry of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, NSW.
34.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2000. Paris: Author.
35.
RowleyG.BrewC.LederG. (1997). The impact of self-selection on patterns of gender differences in mathematics achievement. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Brisbane.
36.
StobartG.ElwoodJ.QuinlanM. (1992). Gender bias in examinations: How equal are the opportunities?British Educational Research Journal, 18(3), 261–276.
37.
TeeseR. (1994). Mass secondary education and curriculum access: A forty-year perspective on mathematics outcomes in Victoria. Oxford Review of Education, 20(1), 93–110.
38.
TeeseR.DaviesM.CharltonM.PoleselJ. (1995). Who wins at school? Boys and girls in Australian secondary education. Canberra: AGPS.
39.
TermanL. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
40.
ThorndikeE. L. (1906). Sex in education. Bookman, 23, 211–214.
41.
WarringtonM.YoungerM. (2000). The other side of the gender gap. Gender and Education, 12(4), 493–508.
42.
WeinerG.ArnotM.DavidM. (1997). Is the future female? Female success, male disadvantage, and changing gender patterns in education. In HalseyA. H.LauderH.StuartWells, A. (Eds.), Education, economy, culture and society(pp. 620–630). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
WhitehouseH.SullivanM. (1992). Girls and Year 12 science examinations: A study of the participation and performance of females in publicly examined science subjects in South Australia from 1986 to 1991 (SSABSA Research Monograph No. 1). Adelaide: SSABSA.
