Following the opening of the first privately managed prison in the UK, Wolds Remand Prison, the authors were commissioned to conduct a comparative evaluation. Studies in the USA and Australia suggest that, compared with similar prisons in the public sector, privately managed prisons appear to operate at lower cost, without any significant reduction in the quality of provision. However, regimes of equal quality are to be found in the public sector, showing that privately managed prisons have no monopoly on innovation or good practice. Reviewing the argument of Harding (1997) that privatization is intended to have a ‘cross fertilization’ effect on the whole prison system, it is difficult to disentangle the effects of other changes on prison conditions and regime delivery. It seems more likely that it is the new competitive ethos and the introduction of managerialist techniques that have impelled prison managers to economise, innovate and often match the achievements of the private sector.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BottomleyA KJamesA LClareELieblingA (1997) Monitoring and Evaluation of Wolds Remand Prison and Comparisons with Public-sector Prisons, in particular HMP Woodhill, Home Office Research and Statistics Directorate, London.
2.
BoweryM (1996) Private Prisons in NSW: Junee — Year Two, Research Publication No 35, NSW Department of Corrective Services, Sydney.
3.
BrakelS (1988) ‘Prison management, private enterprise style. The inmate's evaluation’, New England Journal of Criminal and Civil Confinement, vol 14, pp 175–244.
4.
BrownA (1994) ‘Economic and qualitative aspects of prison privatisation in Queensland’ inMoyleP(ed), Private Prisons and Police: Recent Australians Trends, Pluto Press Australia, Leichhardt, NSW, pp 194–218.
5.
Coopers and Lybrand (1996) Review of Comparative Costs and Performance of Privately and Publicly Operated Prisons, Prison Service Research Report No 1, HM Prison Service, London.
6.
DiIulioJ J (1990) ‘The duty to govern: a critical perspective on the private management of prisons and jails’ inMcDonaldD C(ed), Private Prisons and the Public Interest, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, pp 155–78.
7.
DonahueJ D (1989) The Privatization Decision: Public Ends, Private Means, Basic Books, New York.
8.
HardingR W (1997) Private Prisons and Public Accountability, Open University Press, Buckingham.
9.
HatryH PBrownsteinP JLevinsonR B (1993) ‘Comparison of privately and publicly operated corrections facilities in Kentucky and Massachusetts’ inBowmanG WHakimSSeidenstatP(eds), Privatizing Correctional Institutions, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, pp 193–211.
10.
HM Prison Service (1992) Model Regime for Local Prisons and Remand Centres, HM Prison Service, London.
11.
Home Office (1988) Private Sector Involvement in the Remand System, Cm 434, HMSO, London.
12.
Home Office (1991) Custody, Care and Justice: The Way Ahead for the Prison Service in England and Wales, Cm 1647, HMSO, London.
13.
House of Commons (1987) Fourth Report from the Home Affairs Committee, Session 1986–87: Contract Provision of Prisons, HC 291,HMSO, London.
14.
House of Commons (1997) Second Report from the Home Affairs Committee, Session 1996–97: The Management of the Prison Service (Public and Private), Volume I, The Stationery Office, London.
15.
JamesA LBottomleyA KClareELieblingA (1997) Privatizing Prisons: Rhetoric and Reality, Sage, London.
16.
LevinsonR B (1985) ‘Okeechobee: an evaluation of privatization in corrections’, The Prison Journal, vol 65, pp 75–94.
17.
LoganC H (1990) Private Prisons: Cons and Pros, Oxford University Press, New York.
18.
LoganC H (1992) ‘Well kept: comparing quality and confinement in private and public prisons’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, vol 83, pp 577–613.
19.
LoganC HMcGriffB W (1989) Comparing Costs of Public and Private Prisons: A Case Study, US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice Research in Action, Washington DC.
20.
MacionisS (1994) ‘Contract management in corrections: the Queensland experience’ inMoyleP(ed), Private Prisons and Police: Recent Australian Trends, Pluto Press Australia, Leichhardt, NSW, pp 179–93.
21.
McDonaldD C(ed) (1990) Private Prisons and the Public Interest, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.
22.
McDonaldD C (1994) ‘Public imprisonment by private means: the reemergence of private prisons and jails in the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia’, British Journal of Criminology, vol 34 , pp 29–48.
23.
MoyleP (1993) ‘Privatisation of prisons in New South Wales and Queensland: a review of some key developments’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, vol 32, pp 231–50.
24.
MoyleP(ed) (1994) Private Prisons and Police: Recent Australian Trends, Pluto Press Australia Leichhardt, NSW.
25.
SellersM P (1993) The History and Politics of Private Prisons: A Comparative Analysis, Associated University Presses, London.
26.
ShichorD (1995) Punishment for Profit: Private Prisons/Public Concerns, Sage, London.
27.
Woolf, Lord Justice (1991) Prison Disturbances April 1990: Report of an Inquiry by the Right Hon Lord Justice Woolf (Parts I and II) and his Honour Judge Stephen Tumim (Part II), Cm 1456, HMSO, London.
