Abstract
There is some confusion within criminological theory regarding the gendering of criminality and the consequences of the different treatment of female and male juveniles within the criminal justice system. This confusion leads to inadequate explanations of female criminal activity and promotes a misleading emphasis on the masculinity of crime. If we wish to develop useful social policy aimed at crime prevention, we need to use broader sources of data which avoid sex role stereotypes and better acknowledge female and male criminal practices and motivations. This paper argues that the reliance only upon official statistics, or self report studies, or qualitative interviews is counterproductive. What is required is a three pronged approach which recognises the strengths and weaknesses of each data source and uses each as appropriate. In short we need to rethink the methodologies we adopt if we are to improve our theorising of gender and criminality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
