Adolescents and university students processed comprehension packages designed to induce them to adopt schemas for categorising shoplifters as either “greedy”, “needy” or “troubled” persons. Adolescents' subsequent views of shoplifters, measured on a Shop Stealing Attitude Questionnaire (SSAQ) were related to schema conditions in expected ways, demonstrating the influence of the comprehension packages. Subjects who processed the package claiming that shopstealers are greedy displayed tougher attitudes to shopstealers, with higher mean Greed and Condemn Scale scores. Subjects who processed packages claiming that shopstealers are either needy or troubled displayed more lenient attitudes with higher Need and Troubled Scale Scores. Younger adolescents showed harsher views, while older adolescents and all females were more understanding of offenders' circumstances and motives. Schema inducing comprehension packages, subjects' ages, and SSAQ measured views were weakly predictive of penalties assigned to offenders in sample cases. Finding? support general trends of younger adolescents'punitiveness in relation to a specific offence, but indicate the difficulties of inexperienced penalisers in assigning penalties.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckermanA MMcMahonP MFehrL A (1984) ‘Defendant Characteristics and Judgment Behaviours of Adolescent Mock Jurors’, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, vol 132, pp 123–30.
2.
ArbuthnotJ (1983) ‘Attribution of Responsibility by Simulated Jurors: Stage of Moral Reasoning and Guilt by Association’, Psychological Reports, vol 52, No 1, pp 287–98.
3.
ChallingerD (1988) Stop stealing from our shops: Retail theft in Australia, National Retail Crime Prevention Council, Canberra.
4.
ChiM T HGlaserR (1982) Final Report: Knowledge and Skill Differences in Novices and Experts, University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center, Technical Report No 7.
5.
DillehayR CJerniganL R (1970) ‘The Biased Questionnaire as an Instrument of Attitude Change’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol 15, pp 144–51.
6.
EdwardsP B (1983) ‘Shopstealing in Victoria: Discussion Paper No 8’, Proceedings of the Institute of Criminology, vol 57, pp 139–49.
7.
FreibergAFoxR (1987) ‘Sentencing Structures and Sanction Hierarchies’, Sentencing in Australia: Policies, Issues and Reform, (ed I Potas)Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
GraboskyP (1983) Discussion Paper No 8, Proceedings of the Institute of Criminology, vol 57, pp 139–49.
10.
HickieM L (1983, 27 May –2 June) ‘A Raid with the Golfclub Gang (shoplifting by Sydney Schoolgirls)’, National Times, p 14.
11.
HogarthJ (1971) Sentencing as a human process, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
12.
HomelR (1983) ‘Sentencing in Magistrates' Courts: Some Lessons from a Study of Drinking Drivers’, Issues in criminal justice administration, (edsFindlayMEggerMSuttonJ), Allen and Unwin, Sydney.
13.
KahleL R (1979) ‘Attitudinal Entailment and Resistance to Change’, Journal of Social Psychology, vol 109, pp 99–109.
14.
KarpadisAFarringtonD P (1981) ‘An Experimental Study of Sentencing by Magistrates’, Law and Human Behaviour, vol 5, pp 107–21.
15.
KirbyM D (1981) ‘A New Approach to Teaching Law in the Schools’, Australian Educational Researcher, vol 8, No 3, pp 5–23.
16.
LawrenceJ A (1987) ‘Verbal Processing of Defining Issues Test by principled and Non-principled Moral Reasoners’, Journal of Moral Education, vol 16, No 2, pp 117–30.
17.
— (1988a) ‘Youths' Judgment about Social and Ethical Issues’, SET, No 2. Whole Number.
18.
— (1988b) ‘Making Just Decisions in Magistrates' Courts’, Social Justice Research, 2: No 2, 155–76.
19.
— (1991) ‘Informal Reasoning in the Judicial System’, Informal Reasoning and Education, (edsVossJ FPerkinsD NSegalJ W), Erlbaum and Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
20.
LawrenceJ ATohC E (1989) ‘Professionals' and Non-professionals' Views of Shopstealing’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol 22, pp 167–78.
21.
LewisM WAndersonJ (1985) ‘Discrimination of Operator Schemas in Problem Solving: Learning from Examples’, Cognitive Psychology, vol 17, pp 26–65.
22.
LovegroveA (1987) ‘An Evaluation of Judicial Models for Sentencing Guidelines’, Sentencing in Australia: Policies, Issues and Reform, (edIPotas), Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
23.
NisbettRRossL (1980) Human inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
24.
PotasIViningAWilsonP (1990) Young People and Crime: Costs and Prevention, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
25.
RayJ J (1981) ‘Is the Ned Kelly Syndrome Dead? Some Australian Data on Attitudes to Shoplifting’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol 14, pp 249–52.
26.
RestJ R (1986) Moral development: Advances in Research and Theory, Praeger, New York.
27.
RushCRobertsonJ (1987) ‘The Utility of Information to the Sentencing Decision’, Law and Human Behaviour, vol 11, No 2, 147–55.
28.
SebbaLNathanG (1984) ‘Further Explorations in the Scaling of Penalties’, British Journal of Criminology, vol 24, p 221.
29.
ShererMRogersR W (1984) ‘The Role of Vivid Information in Fear Appeals and Attitude Change’, Journal of Research in Personality, vol 18, pp 321–34.
30.
SiegalM (1985) ‘Children's Rights and Responsibilities from the Perspective of Developmental Psychology and the Law, Age and criminal responsibility in children, (edsCumminsR ABurgessZ M) Australian Psychological Society, Melbourne.
31.
SparksR (1971) ‘The Use of Suspended Sentences’, Criminal Law Review, 384.
32.
SuttonV (1983) ‘Discussion Paper No 8’, Proceedings of the Institute of Criminology, vol 57, pp 139–49.
33.
ThorkildsenT A (1989) ‘Justice in the Classroom: The Student's View’, Child Development, vol 60, pp 323–334.
34.
WalkerE JCollinsMWilsonP (1987) ‘How the Public Sees Sentencing: An Australian Survey’, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, Australian Institute of Criminology, No 4.
35.
WarnerC (1982) ‘A Study of the Self-reported Crime of a Group of Male and Female high School Students’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol 15, pp 255–72.
36.
WatkinsDSampsonJ (1975) ‘Attitudes of Australian Adolescents to Crime and Punishment’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, vol 11, No 2, pp 62–4.
37.
WilsonPWalkerJMukherjeeS (1986) ‘How the Public Sees Crime: An Australian Survey’, Australian Institute of Criminology, Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice, No 2.
38.
WrightR AStormsM D (1981) Male Sexual Schemas and Responses to Male Homosexuality’, Personality and Social Bulletin, vol 7, No 3, 444–50.
