Tax practitioners play a pivotal role in the Australian taxation system. Not only do they act as intermediaries between the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) and the majority of taxpayers, especially business taxpayers, but they also influence the ethical climate and level of compliance with taxation laws. This article discusses this role by reference to data derived from an empirical study of tax practitioners and tax officials from around Australia. The study sheds light on the nature of the compliance problem and the factors which affect the administration of Australian taxation law generally.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Bar Association (1987), Commission on Taxpayer Compliance—Report and Recommendations(July 1987).
2.
AyersF A(1987) ‘Factors Related to Tax Return Positions Recommended by Professional Tax Preparers in Ambiguous Situations’, mimeo, University of Oklahoma.
3.
BardachEKaganR A (1982) Going By the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
4.
BraithwaiteJ (1984) Corporate Crime in the Pharmaceutical Industry, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
5.
BreyersS (1982), Regulation and Its Reform, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
6.
CainM (1983) ‘The General Practice Lawyer and the Client: Towards a Radical Conception’ (pp 106–130) inDingwallRLewisP(eds) (1983) The Sociology of the Professions: Lawyers, Doctors and Others, Macmillan, London.
7.
Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, Annual Report (1985–86), Wolfson College, Oxford.
8.
CoyneM LSmithK W (1987) ‘A Conceptual Framework of the Incentives and Constraints of Tax Practices’, mimeo, American Bar Foundation.
HeinzJ PLaumannE O (1982) Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
17.
HelleloidR T (1987) ‘Ambiguity and the Evaluation of Client Documentation by Tax Professionals’, mimeo, University of Michigan.
18.
HiteP A (1987) ‘Characteristics of taxpayers who use Preparers: An exploratory study’, mimeo, University of Kansas.
19.
JacksonBMillironV C (1987) ‘Research on the Practitioner's Role in the Compliance Process: State of the Art’, mimeo, October 1987.
20.
KaganR A(1978) Regulatory Justice: Implementing a Wage-Price Freeze, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
21.
KatzmannR A(1980) Regulatory Bureaucracy: The Federal Trade Commission and Antitrust Policy, MIT Press, Cambridge.
22.
KaufmanH(1960) The Forest Ranger: a study in administrative behavior, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.
23.
KinseyK A (1987) ‘The Social Dynamics of Tax Encounters: Perspectives of Practitioners and Officials’ mimeo, ABF.
24.
KlepperSNaginD (1987) ‘The Role of Tax Practitioners in Tax Compliance’, mimeo, Department of Statistics and School of Urban and Public Affairs, Carnegie-Mellon University.
25.
LipskyM (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas 0/ the Individual in Public Services, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
26.
LongS B (1980) The Internal Revenue Service: Measuring Tax Offences and Enforcement Response, Document DOJ-11, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC, US Department of Justice.
27.
MansfieldG (1989) ‘The New Approach to Tax Avoidance, First Circular, then Linear, Now Narrower’ British Tax Review (No 1): 5–19.
28.
MazurMNaginD (1987) ‘Tax Preparers and Tax Compliance: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis’, mimeo, Carnegie Mellon University.
29.
McBarnetD (1984) ‘Law and Capital: The Role of Legal Form and Legal Actors’ International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 12:231–8.
30.
— (1988) ‘Law, Policy and Legal Avoidance: Can Law Effectively Implement Egalitarian Policies?’ Journal of Law and Society15:113–21.
31.
— (1991) ‘Whiter than White Collar Crime: Tax , Fraud Insurance and Management of Stigma’ British Journal of Sociology, March 1991.
32.
McKinsey & Co (1990) Improving Services to Tax Agents and Large Companies on a Sustained Basis, Australian Taxation Office, Task Force Report, 20 March 1990.
33.
MyersA (1989) ‘Tax Advice - The Lawyer's Ethical Responsibility’ Australian Law News25(2): 17–20.
34.
O'NeilCCollinsK (1987) ‘The Impact of Return Preparer Penalties on Small Tax Practices’, mimeo, Virginia Polytechnic.
35.
RothJ A (1987) ‘A status report on the National Research Council Panel on Taxpayer Compliance: Tax Practitioners’, mimeo, (p 10) 1987 IRS Research Conference.
36.
RothJ AScholzJ TWitteA D (1989) Taxpayer Compliance, vol l and 2, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
37.
SchwartzR DOrleansS (1967) ‘On Legal Sanctions’ University of Chicago Law Review34: 274–300.
38.
ShapiroS P (1984) Wayward Capitalists: Target of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Yale University Press, New Haven.
39.
SkaddenKM (1987) ‘Are Professional Guidelines Important to Tax Practitioners?’, mimeo, 1987 IRS Research Conference.
40.
StoneA (1977) Economic Regulation and the Public Interest: The Federal Trade Commission in Theory and Practice, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
SuttonA (1989) ‘The Bottom of the Harbour Tax Evasion Schemes’ (pp 1–14) in GraboskyPSuttonA(eds) (1989) Stains on a White Collar: 14 Studies in Corporate Crime or Corporate Harm, Sydney, Century Hutchinson and Federation Press.
43.
TomasicRPentonyB D (1991) ‘Tax Compliance and the Rule of Law: From Legalism to Administrative Procedure’, Australian Tax Forum8:85–116.
44.
TomasicR(ed ) (1984) Business Regulation in Australia, CCH Australia, Sydney.
45.
— (1981) ‘Criminal Lawyers and Their Clients’ Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology14:147–56.
46.
— (1983) ‘Social Organisation Amongst Australian Lawyers’ Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology19: 447–75.
47.
— (1985) The Sociology of Law, Sage, London.
48.
WhiteP (1987) Survey of Tax Practitioners and Advisers: Summary Results by Occupation, June, Office of the Assistant Commissioner (Planning, Finance and Research), Research Division, Internal Revenue Service, Washington DC.
