Traditional arguments against capital punishment are based on an analysis of its efficacy (eg lack of deterrence effect) and on its moral justification (eg state-sanctioned killing). This historical study of the death penalty during the entire period of its use in Victoria looks at a third dimension: the evaluation of capital punishment as a sentencing option. The data demonstrates that the death ‘sentence’ involved a complex decision-making process in which the traditional roles of judge, jury and government were distorted and even obliterated. The resulting sentencing practices departed significantly from accepted standards of legal fairness and justice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenJ (1990) Sex and Secrets: Crimes Involving Australian Women Since 1880. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
2.
Amnesty International (1987) United States of America: the Death Penalty. Surrey, London: Amnesty International Publications.
3.
BarberR NWilsonP R (1968) ‘Deterrant Aspect of Capital Punishment and its Effect on Conviction Rates: the Queensland Experience’ Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology2: 100–08.
4.
BarberRoss (1975) ‘Rape as a capital offence in nineteenth century Queensland’ Australian Journal of Politics and History21: 31–41.
5.
BlazeyP (1990) Bolte: a Political Biography. Port Melbourne, Victoria: Mandarin Australia.
6.
BedauH ARadeletM L (1987) ‘Miscarriages of Justice in Potentially Capital Cases’ Stanford Law Review40: 21–179.
7.
CamusA (1969) ‘Reflections on the guillotine’ in A Resistance, Rebellion and Death. New York: Knopf.
8.
CarrisCarmel (1982) ‘“The Terror of the law” as applied to black rapists in colonial Queensland’ Hecate8: 22–48.
9.
CastlesA C (1971) An Introduction to Australian Legal History. Sydney: Law Book Co.
10.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon.
11.
GriffithsA R G (1970) ‘Capital Punishment in South Australia, 1836–1964’ Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology3: 214–22.
12.
GrossMauro (1989) Death and discrimination. Boston: Northeastern Univ Press.
13.
JohnstonS W (1962) Criminal Homicide Rates in Australia. Howard League for Penal Reform.
14.
JohnsonR (1990) Death work: a Study of the Modem Execution Process. Belmont, California: Brooks and Cole.
15.
KellyJBraithwaiteJ ‘Public Opinion and the Death Penalty in Australia’ Justice Quarterly, vol 7, Sept 1990 pp 529–63.
16.
LasterK (1985) ‘Frances Knorr: She Killed Babies, Didn't She?’ in LakeMKellyF(eds)Double Time. Ringwood, Vic: Penguine Books.
17.
LasterK (1989) ‘Infanticide: a Litmus Test for Feminist Criminological Theory’ Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology22:151–66.
18.
PhilipsD (1987) ‘Sex, Race, Violence and the Criminal Law in Colonial Victoria’ Labor History No 52: 30–49.
19.
PotasIWalkerJ (1987) ‘Capital punishment’ Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice No 3, CanberraInstitute of Criminology,.
20.
RadeletM L(ed) (1989) Facing the Death Penalty: Essays on a Cruel and Unusual Punishment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
21.
RadzinowiczL (1948) A History of English Criminal Law, vol 1. London: Stevens & Sons.
22.
RebisR A (1990) ‘Crimes Against Convention: Rape, Sexuality and the Law in Victoria, 1850–1900’ BA thesis, Department of History, University of Melbourne.
23.
ReimanJ H (1985) ‘Justice, Civilization and the Death Penalty’ Philosophy and Public Affairs14:115–48.
24.
SerleG (1968) The Golden Age: a History of the Colony of Victoria 1851–1861. Parkville; Vic: Melbourne University Press.
25.
ShilsERheinsteinM (1954) Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
