Motivated by growing doubts about the value of a welfare approach towards the processing of young offenders, law reformers in recent years have advocated a shift towards more traditional “justice” principles. This article examines the rhetoric of the “back to justice” trend in one Australian State, South Australia, where in 1976, a Royal Commission into juvenile justice argued in favour of a system which, at least at the adjudication stage, was based firmly on the notions of adversarial justice and due process. Central to this traditional approach is the trial where accused persons invoke their rights by pleading not guilty and putting the prosecution to the test. Yet, as this article demonstrates, the overwhelming majority of young persons in South Australia forego these rights by admitting the allegations made against them. Thus the rhetoric of adversarial justice and the Due Process Model is incompatible with the reality of the routine admission of guilt.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtiyahP S (1983) Law and Modern Society. Oxford: University Press.
2.
Australian Law Reform Commission (1981) Child Welfare Report No 18.
3.
BaileyR (1984) “A Comparison of Appearances by Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Children Before the Children's Court and Children's Aid Panels in South Australia” inAborigines and Criminal Justice, (ed, SwantonB). Canberra: AIC.
4.
BaldwinJMcConvilleM (1977) Negotiated Justice: Pressures to Plead Guilty. London: Martin Robertson.
5.
BaldwinJMcConvilleM (1979) “Plea Bargaining and Plea Negotiations in England” Law and Society Review13: 287.
6.
BankowskiZMunghamG (1976) Images of Law. London: RKP.
7.
BottomsA EMcCleanJ D (1976) Defendants in the Criminal Process. London: RKP.
8.
BlumbergA S (1967) Criminal Justice. Chicago: Quadrangle.
9.
CarlenP (1976) Magistrates' Justice. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
10.
ClarkeJ (1985) “Whose Justice? The Politics of Juvenile Control”International Journal of the Sociology of Law13: 407.
11.
CohenS (1985) Visions of Social Control: Crime, Punishment and Classification. Oxford: Polity Press.
12.
CoopersLybrand (1989) Report on a Review of the New South Wales Court System. Sydney: W D Scott.
13.
Department for Community Welfare (WA) (1976) Report of the Committee on the Future Development of the Juvenile Judicial System in Western Australia. Perth.
14.
DouglasR (1980) “Introduction” in Guilty Your Worship: A Study of Victoria's Magistrates' Courts. Legal Studies Department, La Trobe University. Melbourne.
15.
DouglasR (1982) “Case Structure, Participation and Verdict in the Melbourne Magistrates' Court” ANZJ Crim15:195.
EriksonR VBaranekP M (1982) The Ordering of Justice: A Study of Accused Persons as Dependants in the Criminal Process. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
18.
FarringtonD P (1984) “England and Wales” inWestern Systems of Juvenile Justice, (ed, KleinM W). Beverly Hills: Sage.
19.
FeeleyM M (1979) The Process is the Punishment. New York: Russell Sage.
20.
FreibergAFoxRHoganM (1988) Sentencing Young Offenders. Smithfield: Alken Press.
21.
GaleFWundersitzJ (1989) “The Operation of Hidden Prejudice in Pre-Court Procedures: the Case of Australian Aboriginal Youth” ANZJ Crim22:1–21.
22.
GillerH (1986) “Is there a Role for a Juvenile Court?” The Howard Journal25:161.
23.
GillerHMorrisA(eds) (1983) Providing Criminal Justice for Children. London: Edward Arnold.
24.
HarrisR J (1985) “Towards Just Welfare” British Journal of Criminology25:31.
25.
McBarnetD J (1981a) Conviction: Law, the State and the Construction of Justice. London: McMillan.
26.
McBarnetD J (1981b) “Magistrates' Courts and the Ideology of Justice” British Journal of Law and Society8:181.
27.
McConvilleMBaldwinJ (1981) Courts, Prosecution and Conviction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
28.
McDonaldE M (1981) Up Against the Judge: Perspectives of Juvenile Defendants on the Children's Court System. Perth: unpublished report.
29.
McPhersonC B (1962) The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
30.
Mohr Report (1977). Report of the Royal Commission into the Administration of the Juvenile Courts Act and Other Associated Matters. Adelaide.
31.
MorrisAGillerHSzwedEGeachH (1980) Justice for Children. London: Macmillan.
32.
MurrayJ (1989) Prosecutions Service Annual Report for the Fiscal Year 1988–1989. Internal Report, South Australian Police Department, Adelaide.
33.
NicholsH (1981) “Courts and Panels for Young Female Offenders in South Australia” Paper presented at 51st Anzaas Congress, Brisbane.
34.
O'ConnorISweetappleP (1988) Children in Justice. Melbourne: Hutchinson.
35.
PackerH L (1964) “Two Models of Criminal Justice” University of Pennsylvania Law Review113:1.
36.
ParsloeP (1978) Juvenile Justice in Britain and the United States: The Balance of Needs and Rights. London: RKP.
37.
SallmannP A (1985) Report on Criminal Trials. Melbourne. Australian Institute of Judicial Administration.
38.
ScuttJ A (1977) “Justice in a Juvenile Court: What Price Due Process?” ANZJ Crim10:173.
39.
SeymourJ (1983). Juvenile Justice in South Australia. North Ryde: Law Book Co.
40.
SeymourJ (1988) Dealing with Young Offenders. North Ryde: Law Book Co.
41.
SextonMMaherL W (1982) The Legal Mystique: The Role of Lawyers in Australian Society. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.
42.
Social Welfare Advisory Council (1968). Report on the Establishment of a Juvenile Crime Prevention Scheme. Adelaide, SA.
43.
SugarmanD (1986) “Legal Theory, the Common Law Mind and the Making of the Textbook Tradition” inLegal Theory and Common Law (edTwiningW). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
44.
VardonS (1988) “The South Australian Juvenile Justice System”. Paper presented at the Australian Bicentennial International Congress on Corrective Services, Adelaide.
