Criminology has not done very well at explaining why some societies, some periods
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChiltonRDeAmicisJ (1975) “Overcriminalization and the
Measurement of Consensus” 5Sociology and Social Research318–29.
2.
ColvinMPaulyJ (1983) “A critique of Criminology: Toward
an Integrated Structural-Marxist Theory of Delinquency Production”
89American Journal of Sociology513–51.
3.
CullenF TLinkB GTravisL FWonziakJ F (1985) “Consensus on Crime Seriousness:
Empirical Reality or Methodological Artifact?23Criminology99–118.
4.
FiglioR M (1975) “The Seriousness of Offenses: An
Evaluation of Offenders and Non-Offenders” 66Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology189–200.
5.
HamiltonV LRytinaS (1980) “Social Consensus on Norms of
Justice: Should the Punishment Fit the Crime?85American Journal of Sociology1117–44.
6.
KwasniewskiJ (1984) Society and Deviance in Communist Poland:
Attitudes Towards Social Control, trans M Wilson.
Leamington Spa, Warwickshire: Berg
Publishers.
7.
MeierR F(ed) (1985) Theoretical Methods in
Criminology. Beverly Hills:
Sage.
8.
MietheT D (1982) “Public Consensus on Crime
Seriousness: Normative Structure or Methodological Artifact?”
20Criminology515–26.
9.
-- (1984) “Types of Consensus in Public
Evaluations of Crime: An Illustration of Strategies for Measuring
‘Consensus’” 75Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology459–73.
10.
NewmanG (1976) Comparative Deviance: Perception and Law
in Six Cultures. New York:
Elsevier.
11.
New South Wales Bureau of Crime
Statistics and Research (1974) Crime, Correction and
the Public, Statistical Report 17,
Sydney.
12.
PontellH NKeenanCGraniteDGeisG (1983) “White-Collar Crime Seriousness:
Assessments by Police Chiefs and Regulatory Agency Investigators”
3American Journal of Police1–16.
13.
RiedelM (1975) “Perceived Circumstances,
Inferences of Intent and Judgments of Offense Seriousness”
66Journal Criminal Law and Criminology201–08.
14.
RoseA MPrellA E (1955) “Does the Punishment Fit the
Crime? A Study in Social Validation” 61American Journal of Sociology247–59.
15.
RossiP HSimpsonJ EMillerJ L (1985) “Beyond Crime Seriousness: Fitting
the Punishment to the Crime” 1Journal of Quantitative Criminology59–90.
16.
RossiP HWaiteEBoseC EBerkR E (1974) “The Seriousness of Crimes:
Normative Structure and Individual Differences”
39American Sociological Review224–37.
17.
SellinTWolfgangM (1964)The Measurement of Delinquency, New
York: Wiley.
18.
TaylorL (1972) “The Significance and
Interpretation of Replies to Motivational Questions: The Case of Sex
Offenders” 6Sociology23–39.
19.
ThomasC WCageRFosterS (1976) “Public Opinion on Criminal Law
and Legal Sanctions: An Examination of Two Conceptual Models”
67Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology110–16.
20.
TittleC R (1985) “The Assumption that General
Theories are not Possible” inMeierR F(ed)Theoretical Methods in Criminology. Beverly
Hills: Sage.
21.
WellfordC FWiatrowskiM D (1975) “On the Measurement of
Delinquency” 66Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology175–88.
22.
WestD J (1982) Delinquency: Its Roots, Careers and
Prospects. London:
Heinemann.
23.
WilsonJ QHerrnsteinR (1985) Crime and Human Nature.
New York: Simon and
Schuster.
24.
WilsonP RBrownJ W (1973) Crime and the Community.
Brisbane: University of Queensland
Press.
25.
WrightDCoxE (1967a) “Religious Belief and
Co-education in a Sample of 6th Form Boys and Girls”
9British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology23–31.
26.
-- (1967b) “A Study of the Relationship
Between Moral Judgment and Religious Belief in a Sample of English
Adolescents” 72Journal of Social Psychology135–44.
