The criminal justice system and alcohol rehabilitation: A pilot evaluation study

Emrick C D (1975) “A Review of Psychologically Orientated Treatment of Alcoholism. II. The relative effectiveness of different treatment approaches and the effectiveness of treatment versus no treatment”, J Stud Alcohol 36:88.

Ditman K S Crawford G G (1966) “The Use of Court Probation in the Management of the Alcohol Addict”, Am J Psychiat 122:757.

Brandsma J M Maultsby M C Welsh R J (1980) Outpatient Treatment of Alcoholism: A Review and Comparative Study. Baltimore: University Park Press.

Roizen J Schneberk D (1977) “Alcohol and Crime”, in Alcohol, Casualties and Crime (ed Aarens M Special report prepared for the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism under Contract No (ADM) 281-76-0027. Berkeley, Calif: Social Research Group, University of California.

Roizen J (1982) “Estimating Alcohol Involvement in Serious Events”, in Alcohol and Health Monograph No 1: Alcohol Consumption and Related Problems (ed National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism). Washington: US Government Printing Office.

Smith D I (1983) “An Overview of the Serenity Lodge Evaluation Study”, in 1983 Autumn School of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs (ed Santamaria J N ). Melbourne: St Vincent's Hospital, Department of Community Medicine.

Smith D I (1984) “Evaluation of a Residential AA Programme”, Int J Addict (in press).

Glasser W (1965) Reality Therapy. New York: Harper and Roe.

Smith D I (1983) “Evaluation of an Inpatient Alcohol Rehabilitation Programme”, Drug Alcohol Depend 11:333.

Campbell D T Stanley J C (1966) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Gottheil E (1979) “An Introduction to the Evaluation of Alcoholism Outcome Studies”, in Currents in Alcoholism, vol VII. Recent Advances in Research and Treatment (ed Galanter M ). New York: Grune and Stratton.

Congalton A A (1967) Occupational Status in Australia: Studies in Sociology No 3, University of NSW.

Data was analysed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences ( Nie N H Hull C H Jenkins G G Steinbrenner K Bent D H , (1975), New York: McGraw-Hill). Where an F test indicated at a 0.05 level of probability that homegeneity of variance could not be assumed for a “t” test comparison, a separate variance formula was used. All “t” tests were two tail. For chi-square tests with only one degree of freedom, Yates' correction for continuity was used.

Australian Associated Brewers (1978) “Methods of Measurement — an Industry Perspective”, Comm Hlth St 2:120.

Sobell L C Sobell M B (1980) Alcohol Treatment Outcome Evaluation. Substudy No 1132. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation.

Smith D I (1985) “Should we Evaluate Treatment Programmes in Australia, and if so, how?”, Aust Alcohol/Drug Review 4:23.

Items included in Robinson's questionnaire formed the basis of these three scales which were scored one for the presence of the problem or zero. Maximum scores were Mental-6, Social-5, Physical-7. ( Robinson D (1979) Talking Out of Alcoholism: The Self-Help Process of Alcoholics Anonymous. London: Croom Helm.)