Levels of Custody and Attitude Differences Among Prison Officers: A Comparative Study

Abstract

Research reported in a previous paper (Williams, 1983) suggests that the extent of prison officers' role in maintaining custodial control may be an important variable affecting their attitudes towards disciplinary authority, inmates, and non-custodial staff. This implies that officers working in institutions with different levels of custodial confinement may also vary in their attitudes towards these dimensions. An analysis of responses from officers in prison institutions suggests that attitudes between institutional types do vary significantly. The analysis identified differences between the maximum security prison and non-maximum security prisons, while “treatment institutions” did not appear to be significantly different. However, officers in the female institution appear to hold quite distinctive role orientations and attitudes.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Clemmer

(1940), The Prison Community, Boston, Christopher.

Cloward

R A

(1960), “Social Control Within the Prison”, Theoretical Studies in Social Organisation of the Prison, New York, Social Science Research Council Pamphlet No 15.

Cronbach

L J

(1951), “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests”, Psychometrika 16:297–334.

Emery

F E

(1969), Freedom and Justice Within Walls, London, Tavistock.

Emery

F E

Emery

de Jago

(1973), Hope Within Walls, Canberra, Australian National University Centre for Continuing Education.

Green

P E

(1978), Analysing Multivariate Data, Hinsdale Ill, Dryden.

Johnson

R M

(1977), “Multiple Discriminant Analysis: Marketing Research Applications”, Multivariate Methods for Market and Survey Research, (ed)

Sheth

Chicago, American Marketing Association.

Klecka

W R

(1980), Discriminant Analysis, Beverley Hills, Sage Publications.

Massy

W F

(1965), “On Methods: Discriminant Analysis of Audience Characteristics”, Journal of Advertising Research 5:39–48.

10.

McCLeery

R H

(1966), “The Governmental Process and Informal Control”, The Prison: Studies in Institutional Organisation and Change, (ed)

Cressy

D R

New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

11.

Nie

N H

Hull

C H

Jenkins

J G

Steinbrenner

Bent

D H

(1975), Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, New York, McGraw Hill.

12.

Peterson

R A

Mahajan

,“Practical Significance and Partitioning Variance in Discriminant Analysis”, Decision Sciences 1976 7: 649–58

13.

Soutar

G N

Clarke

Y M

“Life Style and Television Viewing Behaviour in Perth, Western Australia”. Australian Journal of Management 1981, 6: 297–334

14.

Sykes

Society of Captives, 1958, Princeton, Princeton University Press

15.

Thomas

J E

The English Prison Since 1850 1972, London, Routledge

16.

Thomas

J E

Williams

T A

“Change and Conflict in the Evolution of Prison Systems”, Int J Crim and Penol 1977, 5: Nov.

17.

Watson

L J

“Approaches to the Interpretation of Multiple Discriminant Analysis in Organisational Research” Academy of Management Review 1982, 7: 124–32

18.

Weaver

J R

Soutar

G N

Everett

J E

“Job Satisfaction in the South Western Australian Timber Industry: A Perceptual Mapping Approach” 1983, Management Research News (in press).

19.

Williams

T A

(1983), “Custody and Conflict: An Organizational Study of Prison Officers' Roles and Attitudes”, 16 ANZJ Crim 44.

20.

Zald

M N

(1963), “Power Balance and Staff Conflict in Correctional Institutions”, Admin Sci Q7: June.