BeanP (1976) Rehabilitation and Deviance, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
2.
BellamyC J (1977) “Computers and Law Enforcement” Paper presented to Conference on Computers and Law Centre for continuing education Monash University.
3.
BermantGChappellDCrockettGeraldine TJaconbovitchM DMcGuireM (1975) “Juror Responses to pre-recorded videotape trial presentations in California and Ohio” Hastings Law Journal, 26:975.
4.
BlumbergA S (1974) Criminal Justice, New Viewpoints, New York.
5.
BrakelS J (1975) “Videotape in Trial proceedings: A Technological Obsession?” American Bar Association Journal, 61:957.
6.
BrickeyS LMillerD E (1975) “Bureaucratic due process: an ethnography of a traffic court”, Social Problems22(5):688.
7.
BriscoeO V (1970) “… for the Devil Does Not Know Man's Intention” (1970)44ALJ23.
8.
CairnsB C (1975) “The Status and Function of Social Background Reports in the Children's Court” (1975)49ALJ621.
9.
CairnsB C (1976) “Social Background Investigations for the Children's Court” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology9:109.
10.
CaplanR LParkesKSchwinotP (1974) “Judicial Administration — technology and the courts” American Survey of Am Law: 63–96.
11.
CarlenP (1976) Magistrates' Justice, Martin Robertson, London.
12.
ChamblissW JSeidmanR B (1971) Law, Order and Power, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Mass.
13.
Criminal Law Review (1977) “The Tape-Recording of Police Interrogations” The Criminal Law Review1977: 1–3.
14.
DaddarioE Q (1967) “Technology Assessment — A Legislative View” George Washington Law Review, 36: 1044–59.
15.
DavisK C (1971) Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry, University of Illinois Press, Chicago.
16.
DoretD M (1974) “Trial by Videotape — Can Justice Be Seen to be Done?” Temple Law Quarterly47:228–68.
17.
EllicottR J (1977(a)) “Computers and the Law” Commonwealth Record2(20):614–6.
18.
EllicottR J (1977(a)) Criminal Investigation Bill (second reading 1977)Hansard(H of R)24March1977.
19.
EllulJ (1964) The Technological Society, Vintage Books, New York.
20.
EtheridgeC F (1973) “Lawyers versus Indigents — Conflict of Interest in Professional Client Relations in the Legal Profession” inFriedsonE(Ed)The Professions and their Prospects, Beverly Hills.
21.
FrancisR DCoyleI R (1976) “Sentencing: Applications of videotape in analysis and training” paper produced atPsychology Department, La Trobe University, 1976.
22.
FriedmanL M (1975) The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective, The Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
23.
FriedmanW (1972) Law In a Changing Society, 2nd ed, Penguin Books, Hammondsworth, Middlesex.
24.
GrafsteinJ S (1974) Book review of L H Tribe'sChannelling Technology Through Law, La Revue du Rarreau Canadia, 52:329–36.
25.
GreenH P (1967) “Technology, Assessment and the Law: Introduction and Perspective” George Washington Law Review36:1033–43.
26.
GrossmanB A (1970) “The Role of the Prosecutor in Canada” American Journal of Comparative Law18:498.
27.
HeilbronerR L (1972) “Do Machines Make History?” inKranzbergDavenport(Eds)Technology and Culture: An Anthology, Schocken Books, New York.
28.
HoustonW DHollandFBeckJn W W (1973) “Instant Replay for Appellate Courts” American Rar Association Journal, 59:153–61.
29.
HoffmannL (1973) “Alcohol and Traffic Safety: Screening Out the Drunken Driver” inEtzioniAKempR(Eds)Technological Shortcuts to Social Change, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
30.
IllichI (1975) Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health, Lothian Publishing Co Pty Ltd, London.
31.
JohnsonT J (1972) Professions and Power, Macmillan, London.
32.
KahnHBruce-BriggsB (1972) Things to Come — Thinking About the Seventies and Eighties, Macmillan, New York.
33.
KatzenbackN de BTomcR W (1972) “Crime Data Centres: The Use of Computers in Crime Detection and Prevention”, Columbia Survey of Human Rights Law, 4:49.
34.
KaupenW (1966) “The Role of Law and the Lawyer in Modern Society — A Structural Functional Analysis” mimeo, University of Cologne.
35.
LabonWesley (1975) “The Modernisation of Court Functions — A Review of Court Management and Computer Technology” Rutgers Journal of Computers and Law5(1):97.
36.
LeffA A (1976) “Law and Technology: On Shoring up a Void” Ottawa Law Review, 8:536–48.
37.
MacDonaldM E (1973) “Computer Support for the Courts — A Case for Cautious Optimism” Judicature57(2):52.
38.
MarkeyH T (1971) “A forum for technocracy?” A Report on the Science Court Proposal Judicature608:364–7l.
39.
MaslowJ E (1976) “LEAA's Great Hardware Handout” Juris Doctor, February1976:23.
40.
McKeeW S (1973) “Computers and the Courts — Recommendations made to the Courts Task Force”, Rutgers Journal of Computers and the Law, 3(1):134–51.
41.
MilibandR (1973) The State in Capitalist Society — The Analysis of the Western System of Power, Quartet Books, London.
42.
MillerA S (1967) “Science vs Law: Some Legal Problems raised by ‘Big Science’”, Ruffalo Law Review, 17:591.
43.
NejelskiPaul (1971) “Computer Simulation: An Aid to Court Study”, Judicature, 55(1):18.
44.
NiblettBBorehamJ “Cluster Analysis in Court”, Jurimetrics Journal, 17(1):32–8.
45.
National Institute of Law Enforcement & Criminal Justice, 1977The Technology Transfer Program, Washington DC.
46.
O'ConnorD (1976) “Self Incrimination” Paper presented at 47th ANZAAS Conference, Hobart, Tasmania.
47.
PerryF G (1974) Information for the Court: A New Look at Social Inquiry Reports, Cambridge Institute of Criminology, Cambridge.
48.
PetersA M (1969) “The Brave New World: Can the Law Bring Order Within the Traditional Concepts of due Process”, Suffolk University Law Review4:894–919.
49.
QuinneyR (1974) Critique of Legal Order, Little, Brown and Company, Boston.
50.
RieffP (1968) The Triumph of the Therapeutic — Uses of Faith after Freud, Harper & Row, New York.
51.
RobertsJ J (1974) “A Practitioner's Primer on Computer—Generated Evidence” University of Chicago Law Review, 41:253–80.
52.
RothA W (1974) “Videotape in the Courts: Its Use and Potential” Rutgers Journal of Computers and the Law, 3(2):279–309.
53.
RossH L (1973) “Law, Science and Accidents: The British Road Safety Act of 1967”, The Journal of Legal Studies, 2:1–78.
54.
SalvanS A (1975) “Videotape for the Legal Community”, Judicature59(5):222.
55.
SamekR A “Beyond the Stable State of Law, Ottawa Law Review, 8:549–59.
56.
SeagleW (1952) Law: The Science of Inefficiency, Macmillan, New York.
57.
ShapiroI S (1977) “Science and Law” Jurimetrics Journal, Spring1977:195.
58.
SimonbergL (1977) “TV in Court: The Wide World of Torts” Juris Doctor7(4):41.
59.
SkolnickJ (1967) “Social Control in the Adversary System” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 11:52–70.
60.
SlaytonP (1974) Electronic Legal Retrieval, A Report prepared for the Department of Communications of the Government of Canada; Information Canada, Ottawa.
61.
Smitkin “Videotape Trials: Legal and Practical Implications” Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems19739:363–93.
62.
SternG (1974) “Courts and Computers” Judicature58(5):222.
63.
StevesH G (1977) “Science, Technology and Law — A Growing Partnership” Jurimetrics Journal, Spring1977:189–94.
64.
StiverC E (1973) “Videotape Trials: A Practical Evaluation and a Legal Analysis” Stanford Law Review26:619–45.
65.
StokeyR P (1976) “How the Computer can help the Litigator” American Bar Association Journal62:212.
66.
StoneJ G (1968) Legal System and Lawyers' Reasoning, Maitland Publications Pty Ltd, Sydney.
67.
SudnowD (1965) “Normal Crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code in a Public Defender Office” Social Problems12:255.
68.
TapperC (1975) “Evidence from Computers” Rutgers Journal of Computers and the Law, 4(2):324–467.
69.
TomasicR (1977(a)) Drugs, Alcohol and Community Control, Law Foundation of NSW, Sydney.
70.
TomasicR (1977(b)) Deterrence and the Drinking Driver, Law Foundation of NSW, Sydney.
71.
TomasicR (1977(c)) “Court-based Programs for Alcoholic and Drug-Dependent Persons”, Journal of Drugs Issues7(4):377.
72.
TomasicR (1977(d)) “The Dangerousness of Dangerousness” The Dangerous Offender—Prediction and Assessment ProceedingsThe Institute of Criminology, No 32 University of Sydney Law School.
73.
TomasicRPurcellT P (1978) “The Impact of Technology Upon the Legal Profession ”Understanding Lawyers: Perspectives on the Legal Profession in Australia (TomasicR, ed) Law Foundation of NSW, and George Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
74.
TribeL H (1971) “Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process”, Harvard Law Review, 84/1329.
75.
TribeL H (1973(a)) Channelling Technology Through Law, The Bracton Press Ltd, Chicago.
76.
TribeL H (1973(b)) “Technology Assessment and the Fourth Discontinuity: The Limits of Instrumental Rationality” Southern California Law Review, 46(3):617–60.
77.
UdaJ (1975) “Privacy, Law Enforcement, and Public Interest: Computerized Criminal Records”, Montana Law Review, 36:60–79.
78.
WattsF GWorkC R (1970) “Developing Automated Information System for the Prosecutor” American Criminal Law Quarterly9:164–9.
79.
WeeramantryC G (1975) The Law in Crisis: Bridges of Understanding, Capemoss, London.
80.
WeinsteinD (1976) “Judicial Independence in the Computer Age” Judicature59(8):372.
81.
WoodA L (1967) Criminal Lawyer, College and University Press, New Haven.
82.
ZimanJ (1977) The Force of Knowledge: The Scientific Dimension of SocietyCambridge University Press.