An examination of a Crime Stoppers initiative – a weekly page published in a major city-based tabloid newspaper – afforded a rare glimpse into this understudied global entity. It also offered a means of reflecting on the co-option of CCTV images; partnerships between police, media organisations, and diverse publics; and the harnessing of citizen labour in a culture of surveillance. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted on the images, accompanying texts, and rhetoric of this feature page for a two-year period. From a media criminology perspective, the portrayals underscore the abrogation of the presumption of innocence, a focus on mundane property offences, with the potential to exacerbate fear of crime and to engender more punitive public attitudes. From a conceptual frame, this article proffers the notion of surveil-labour where the repurposing of CCTV data in the context of a Crime Stoppers scheme reinforces an alliance of police, media, and the public to enhance an infrastructure of informing.
Andrejevic, M. (2006). The discipline of watching: Detection, risk, and lateral surveillance. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23(5), 391–407. doi: 10.1080/07393180601046147
2.
AylingJ. (2007).
Force multiplier: People as a policing resource. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice,
31(1), 73–100. doi:10.1080/01924036.2007.9678761
3.
Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.
4.
CarriereK. D. (1987).
Crime Stoppers critically considered. Canadian Criminology Forum,
8, 104–115.
5.
CarriereK.D.EricsonR. V. (1989). Crime Stoppers: A study in the organization of community policing.
Toronto, Canada:
University of Toronto Centre of Criminology.
6.
ChallingerD. (2003). Crime Stoppers: Evaluating Victoria’s program. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice No. 272. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
7.
ChallingerD. (2004). Crime Stoppers Victoria: An evaluation. Technical and Background Paper No. 8. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
8.
ChanJ.Bennett-MosesL. (2016).
Is big data challenging criminology?Theoretical Criminology,
20(1), 21–39. doi:10.1177/1362480615586614
9.
ChurchillB. (2013). Content analysis. In WaltersM. (Ed.), Social research methods (3rd ed., pp. 265–269).
Victoria, Australia:
Oxford University Press.
10.
Cunneen, C., & Russell, S. (2017). Social media, vigilantism and Indigenous people in Australia. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology. http://criminology.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264079-e-109.
11.
DawsonD. (2012). What do you think?: International public opinion on camera surveillance. In DoyleA.LippertR.LyonD. (Eds.), Eyes everywhere: The global growth of camera surveillance (pp. 275–291).
Oxon, UK:
Routledge.
12.
DoyleA. (2006). An alternative current in surveillance and control: Broadcasting surveillance footage of crimes. In HaggertyK. D.EricsonR. V. (Eds.), The new politics of surveillance and visibility (pp. 199–224).
Toronto, Canada:
University of Toronto Press.
13.
GalanopoulosD. (1999). Crime Stoppers: A review of the Victorian program with particular emphasis on the extent to which it exemplifies community policing philosophies (Master’s thesis), Criminology Department,
University of Melbourne,
Australia.
14.
GarlandD. (2001). The culture of control.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
15.
Gold Coast Bulletin. (2016, January 2). Teaming up to beat crims. Gold Coast Bulletin, p. 46.
16.
GooldB.LoaderI.ThamalaA. (2013).
The banality of security: The curious case of surveillance cameras. British Journal of Criminology,
53(6), 977–996. doi:10.1093/bjc/azt044
17.
GraboskyP. N. (1992).
Law enforcement and the citizen: Non-governmental participants in crime prevention and control. Policing and Society,
2, 249–271.
18.
GraboskyP.N. (2004). Toward a theory of public/private interaction in policing. In. McCordJ. (Ed.), Beyond empiricisms: Institutions and intentions in the study of crime (pp. 69–82).
Piscataway, NJ:
Transaction Books.
19.
GreshamP.StockdaleJ.BatholomewI. (2003). Evaluating the impact of Crime Stoppers. Online report 22/03.
London, UK:
Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate.
20.
GreshamP.StockdaleJ.BatholomewI.BullockK. (2001). An evaluation of the impact of Crime Stoppers. Briefing note 10/01.
London, UK:
Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate.
21.
GriffinT.MillerM. K.HoppeJ.RebideauxA.HammackR. (2007).
A preliminary examination of AMBER alert’s effects. Criminal Justice Policy Review,
18(4), 378–394. doi:10.1177/0887403407302332
22.
HaggertyK.EricsonR. (2000).
The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology,
51, 605–622.
23.
HierS. P.GreenbergJ.WalbyK.LettD. (2007).
Media, communication and the establishment of public camera surveillance programmes in Canada. Media, Culture & Society, 25(5), 727–751. doi:10.1177/01634437070805341
JewkesY. (2011). Media and crime (2nd ed.).
London, UK:
Sage.
26.
LavrakasJ.RosenbaumD.LurigioA. (1990). Media cooperation with police: The case of Crime Stoppers. In SuretteR. (Ed.), The media and criminal justice policy: Recent research and social effects (pp. 225–241).
Springfield, IL:
Charles C. Thomas.
27.
Lee, M., & McGovern, A. (2014). Policing and media: Public relations, simulations and communications. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
28.
LeeM.McGovernA. (2015).
Logics of risk: Police communications in an age of uncertainty. Journal of Risk Research, 19(10), 1291–1302. doi:10.1080/13669877.2015.1115423
29.
LippertR. (2002).
Policing property and moral risk through promotions, anonymization and rewards: Crime Stoppers revisited. Social and Legal Studies,
11(4), 475–502.
30.
LippertR. (2009).
Signs of the surveillant assemblage: Privacy regulation, urban CCTV and governmentality. Social and Legal Studies,
18(4), 505–522. doi:10.1177/0964663909345096
31.
Lippert, R. K. & Walby, K. (2017). Funnelling through foundations and Crime Stoppers: How public police create and span inter-organisational boundaries. Policing and Society, 27(6), 602–619. doi: 10.1080/10439463.2017.1341509
32.
LippertR.WilkinsonB. (2010).
Capturing crime, criminals and the public’s imagination: Assembling Crime Stoppers and CCTV surveillance.Crime, Media and Culture,
6(2), 131–152. doi:10.1177/1741659010369950
33.
LurigioA. J.RosenbaumD. P. (1991).
The effects of mass media on crime prevention awareness, attitudes and behavior: The case of Crime Stoppers. American Journal of Criminal Justice,
15, 82–105.
34.
MawbyR. C. (2010).
Police corporate communications, crime reporting and the shaping of policing news. Policing and Society,
20(1), 124–139. doi:10.1080/10439461003611526
35.
McGovernA.LeeM. (2010).
‘Copy[ing] it sweet’: Police media units and the making of news. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology,
43(3), 444–464.
36.
ParentG. (1993).
True fiction: Crime Stoppers shows. International Review of Community Development,
30, 171–180.
37.
PfuhlE. H. (1992).
Crime Stoppers: The legitimation of snitching. Justice Quarterly,
9(3), 505–528. doi:10.1080/07418829200091501
38.
PowellA.OveringtonC.HamiltonG. (2017).
Following #JillMeagher: Collective meaning-making in response to crime events via social media. Crime, Media and Culture, 1–20. Published online 26 July, doi:10.1177/1741659017721276
39.
PutnisP. (1996). Police-media relations: Issues and trends. In ChappellD.WilsonP. (Eds.), Australian policing: Contemporary issues (pp. 201–218).
Sydney, Australia:
Butterworths.
RosenbaumD. P.LurigioA. J.LavrakasP. J. (1989).
Enhancing citizen participation and solving serious crime: A national evaluation of Crime Stoppers programs. Crime & Delinquency,
35(3), 401–420. doi:10.1177/0011128789035003006
43.
RowbottomJ. (2013). To punish, inform and criticise: The goals of naming and shaming. In PetleyJ. (Ed.), Media and public shaming: Drawing the boundaries of public disclosure (pp. 1–18).
London, UK:
I.B. Tauris in association with the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford.
44.
SolymosiR.CellaK.NewtonA. (2017).
Did they report it to stop it? A realist evaluation of the effect of an advertising campaign on victims’ willingness to report unwanted sexual behaviour. Security Journal, 31(2), 570–590. doi:10.1057/s41284-017-0117-y
45.
StrattonG.PowellA.CameronR. (2016).
Crime and justice in digital society: Towards a ‘digital criminology’. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy,
6(2), 17–33. doi:10.5204/ijcjsd.v6i2.355
46.
Surette, R. (2015). Media, crime, and criminal justice: Images, realities, and policies (5th ed.). Stamford CT: Cengage.
47.
ThomsonA. (1989).
Review of Kevin D. Carriere and Richard V. Ericson, Crime Stoppers: A study in the organization of community policing. Journal of Human Justice,
1(1), 116–118.
48.
ThomsonT. (2010). Crime Stoppers and the police: The ideological construction of community. In McCormickC. (Ed.), Constructing danger: Emotions and the mis/representation of crime in the news (Chapter 8).
Halifax, Canada:
Fernwood Publishing.
49.
TylerR.FaganJ. (2008).
Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities?Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law,
6, 231–275.
50.
WillisM.TaylorE.LeeM.GannoniA. (2017). Police detainee perspectives on CCTV. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice No. 538.
Canberra:
Australian Institute of Criminology.
51.
Wright-MonodS. (2017).
Portraying those we condemn with care: Extending the ethics of representation. Critical Criminology,
25, 343–356. doi:10.1007/s10612-016-9348-1
