This study explored the perceptions of ten Crown Prosecutors about the utility of police interviews as video evidence-in-chief for adult sexual assault complainants to determine how to improve these interviews. A themed analysis of prosecutors' responses indicated three major concerns about these interviews: the interviewer using wordy instructions, the lack of chronology and logical structure, and the relentless pursuit of unnecessary detail. These findings suggest that prosecutors' concerns are primarily due to police using cognitive interview methods that attempt to enhance the amount of detail recalled by a complainant. The authors discuss why generating large amounts of detail may be problematic in interviews with sexual assault complainants and provide recommendations for how police can adapt interview practices to better meet evidential needs.
AtkesonB. M.CalhounK. S.ResickP. A.EllisE. M. (1982) Victims of rape: Repeated assessment of depressive symptoms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology50(1): 96.
2.
BentonT. R.RossD. F.BradshawE.ThomasW. N.BradshawG. S. (2006) Eyewitness memory is still not common sense: Comparing jurors, judges and law enforcement to eyewitness experts. Applied Cognitive Psychology20(1): 115–129.
3.
BrewinC. R. (2007) Autobiographical memory for trauma: Update on four controversies. Memory15: 227–248.
4.
BurrowsK. S.PowellM. (2014) Prosecutors' recommendations for improving child witness statements about sexual abuse. Policing and Society24: 189–207. .
5.
BurrowsK. S.PowellM. B.AnglimJ. (2013) Facilitating child witness interviewers' understanding of evidential requirements through prosecutor instruction. International Journal of Police Science & Management15(4): 263–272.
6.
BurtonM.EvansR.SandersA. (2006) Are special measures for vulnerable and intimidated witnesses working? Evidence from the criminal justice agencies, London: Home Office.
7.
ChaikenJ. (1980) Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personalilty and Social Psychology39: 752–766.
8.
ChaikenS.LibermanA.EaglyA. H. (1989) Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In: UlemanJ. S.BarghJ. A. (eds) Unintended thought, New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 212–252.
9.
Criminal Justice Joint Inspection (2009) Report of a joint thematic review of victim and witness experiences in the criminal justice system, London: Home Office.
10.
DalyK.BouhoursB. (2010) Rape and attrition in the legal process: A comparative analysis of five countries. Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research39(1): 565–650.
11.
DeffenbacherK. A.BornsteinB. H.PenrodS. D.McGortyE. K. (2004) A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior28: 687–706.
12.
EllisonL.MunroV. E. (2013) A ‘special’delivery? Exploring the impact of screens, live-links and video-recorded evidence on Mock Juror deliberation in rape trials. Social & Legal Studies.. Epub ahead of print 2013. DOI: 0964663913496676.
13.
EstrichS. (1987) Real rape, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
EvansK. (1995) Advocacy in court: A beginner's guide, (2nd ed). London: Blackstone.
15.
FisherR. P.BrewerN.MitchellG. (2009) The relation between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony: Legal versus cognitive explanations. In: WilliamsonT.BullR.ValentineT. (eds) Handbook of psychology of investigative interviewing: Current developments and future directions, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 121–136.
16.
FisherR. P.GeiselmanR. E. (1992) Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview, Springfield, IL: Thomas.
17.
FisherR. P.GeiselmanR. E. (2010) The cognitive interview method of conducting police interviews: Eliciting extensive information and promoting therapeutic jurisprudence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry33(5): 321–328.
18.
FisherR. P.GeiselmanR. E.RaymondD. S.JurkevichL. M.WarhaftigM. L. (1987) Enhancing enhanced eyewitness memory: Refining the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science & Administration15: 291–297.
19.
FisherR. P.MelloE. W.McCauleyM. R. (1999) Are jurors' perceptions of eyewitness credibility affected by the cognitive interview?Psychology, Crime & Law5: 167–176.
20.
GeiselmanR. E.FisherR. P.FirstenbergI.HuttonL. A.SullivanS. J.AvetissianI. V.ProskA. L. (1984) Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science & Administration12: 74–80.
21.
HamlynB.PhelpsA.TurtleJ.SattarG. (2004) Are special measures working? Evidence from surveys of vulnerable and intimidated witnesses, London: Home Office.
22.
KebbellM. R.O'KellyC. M. E.GilchristE. L. (2007) Rape victims' experiences of giving evidence in English Courts: A survey. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law14: 111–119.
23.
KebbellM. R.WagstaffG. F.PreeceD. (1998) The effect of belief that testimony was elicited with a cognitive interview on jurors' judgments of guilt. Psychology, Crime & Law4: 17–25.
24.
KilpatrickD. G.ResickP. A.VeronenL. J. (1981) Effects of a rape experience: A longitudinal study. Journal of Social Issues37(4): 105–122.
25.
KilpatrickD. G.SaundersB. E.Amick-McMullanA.BestC. L.VeronenL. J.ResnickH. S. (1989) Victim and crime factors associated with the development of crime-related post-traumatic stress disorder. Behavior Therapy20(2): 199–214.
26.
KlettkeB.GraesserA. C.PowellM. B. (2010) Expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases: The effects of evidence, coherence and credentials on juror decision making. Applied Cognitive Psychology24(4): 481–494.
27.
KöhnkenG.MilneR.MemonA.BullR. (1999) The cognitive interview: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime & Law5(1): 3–27.
28.
KonradiA. (1999) “I don't have to be afraid of you”: Rape survivors' emotion management in court. Symbolic Interaction22(1): 45–77.
29.
LattsM. G.GeiselmanR. E. (1991) Interviewing survivors of rape. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology7(1): 8–17.
30.
LeesS. (2002) Carnal knowledge: Rape on trial,, 2nd ed. London: The Women's Press.
31.
LoftusE. F.PalmerJ. C. (1974) Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior13: 585–589.
32.
McMillanL.ThomasM. (2009) Police interviews of rape victims: Tensions and contradictions. In: HorvathM.BrownJ. (eds) Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking, Devon: Willan Publishing, pp. 255–280.
33.
MemonA.MeissnerC. A.FraserJ. (2010) The cognitive interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy and Law16(4): 340–372.
34.
MilneR. (2004) The enhanced cognitive interview: A step-by-step guide, Portsmouth: University of Portsmouth.
35.
MilneR.BullR. (1999) Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice, Chichester: Wiley.
36.
New Zealand Police (2009) Witness guide, Wellington: New Zealand Police.
37.
PattonM. Q. (2005) Qualitative research. In: EverittB. S.HowellD. C. (eds) Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral scienceVol. 3, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 1633–1636.
38.
PenningtonN.HastieR. (1993) The storymodel for juror decision making. In: HastieR. (ed.) Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 192–221.
39.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986) Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
40.
PowellM. B.FisherR. P.WrightR. (2005) Investigative interviewing. In: BrewerN.WilliamsK. (eds) Psychology and law: An empirical perspective, New York, NY: Guilford, pp. 11–42.
41.
ReadJ. D.ConnollyA. (2007) The effects of delay on long-term memory for witnessed events. In: TogliaM. P.ReadJ. D.RossD. R.LindsayR. C. L. (eds) Handbook of eyewitness psychology: Volume I. Memory for events, New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 117–155.
42.
ShepherdE.MortimoreA.TurnerV.WatsonJ. (1999) Spaced cognitive interviewing: Facilitating therapeutic and forensic narration of traumatic memories. Psychology, Crime & Law5: 117–143.
43.
SimJ.WrightC. (2000) Research in health care: Concepts, designs and methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Nelson Thornes.
44.
SternV. (2010) The Stern review, London: Home Office.
45.
StraussA.CorbinJ. M. (1990) Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques, Hampshire: Sage Publications, Inc.
46.
TaylorN.JoudoJ. (2005) The impact of pre-recorded video and closed circuit television testimony by adult sexual assault complainants on jury decision-making: An experimental study, Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
47.
TriggsS.MossmanE.JordanJ.KingiV. (2009) Responding to sexual violence: Attrition in the New Zealand criminal justice system, Wellington: Ministry of Women's Affairs.
48.
WesteraN.KebbellM.MilneB. (2013a) It is better, but does it look better? Prosecutor perceptions of using rape complainant investigative interviews as evidence. Psychology, Crime & Law19: 595–610.
49.
WesteraN.KebbellM.MilneB. (2013b) Losing two thirds of the story: A comparison of the video recorded police interview and live evidence of rape complainants. Criminal Law Review. 4, 290–308.
50.
WesteraN.KebbellM. R.MilneR. (2011) Interviewing rape complainants: Police officers' perceptions of interview format and quality of evidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology25(6): 917–926.
51.
WrightR.PowellM. B.RidgeD. (2006) Child abuse investigation: An in-depth analysis of how police officers perceive and cope with daily work challenges. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management29(3): 498–512.
52.
YerkesR. M.DodsonJ. D. (1908) The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology & Psychology18: 459–482.
