The rehabilitative model of probation with its inherent social work values, knowledge and methods of intervention remains the dominant approach to the supervision of offenders in Hong Kong. The major aim of this paper is to look at the perceptions and experiences of 10 female drug offenders aged from 19 to 30 of their one-year community probation sentence, using a gender analysis of criminality and drug misuse. Allowing female offenders to speak is essential not only in understanding their problems and needs related to their offending behaviour but also to empower them to inform practitioners what in practice will work best with them. According to data generated from in-depth face-to-face interviews, females used drugs as a means of coping with relationship breakdowns and their complex lifestyles, and preferred being treated as friends rather than criminals who required close supervision. These women also quoted the support of their family, and their own determination as being the most important factors to bring about change in their offending behaviour. In relation to the Chinese culture, it is argued that a concern for personal relationships is an important part of probation work in order to reduce the risk of reoffending.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderR. (2000). Counselling, treatment and intervention methods with juvenile and adult offenders.Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
2.
ArnotM., & UsborneC. (Eds.) (1999). Gender and crime in modern Europe.London: UCL Press.
3.
AustinJ., BloomB., & DonahueT. (1992). Female offenders in the community: An analysis of innovative strategies and programs.Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
4.
BedfordA. (1974). Women and parole.British Journal of Criminology, 22, 106–117.
5.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1991). Women in prisons.Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
6.
CarlenP. (1983). Women's imprisonment: A study in social control.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
ChapmanT., & HoughM. (1998). Evidence based practice: A guide to effective practice.London: Home Office.
11.
Chesney-LindM. (1973). Judicial enforcement of the female sex role in family court and the female delinquent.Issues in Criminology, 8, 51–69.
12.
ChuiW.H. (2000). Probation for adult offenders in Hong Kong: Self-reported reoffending and perceived impact. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, UK.
13.
ChuiW.H. (2001). Theoretical underpinnings of community-based sentences and custody for young offenders in Hong Kong.Hong Kong Law Journal, 31(2), 266–82.
14.
ChuiW.H. (2003). Experiences of probation supervision in Hong Kong: Listening to the young adult offenders.Journal of Criminal Justice, 31(6), 567–77.
15.
ChuiW.H. (2004). Adult offenders on probation in Hong Kong: An exploratory study.British Journal of Social Work, 34(3), 443–54.
16.
CrowI. (2001). The treatment and rehabilitation of offenders.London: Sage.
Director of Social Welfare. (1997). Departmental report.Hong Kong: Government Printer.
19.
DowdenC., & AndrewsD.A. (1999). What works for female offenders: A meta-analytic review.Crime and Delinquency, 45(4), 438–52.
20.
EatonM. (1993). Women after prison.Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
21.
EinsteinS. (1984). Outline of drug user treatment: A selection of additional needed factors.International Journal of Addiction, 19, 701–7.
22.
GelsthorpeL. (1989). Sexism and the female offender.Aldershot, UK: Gower.
23.
GendersE., & PlayerE. (1987). Women in prison: The treatment, the control and the experience. In CarlenP., & WorrallA. (Eds.), Gender, crime and justice (pp. 161–75). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
24.
GreenfeldL, & SnellT. (1999). Women offenders (Bulletin no. NCJ-175688), Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
25.
HamptonB. (1993). Prisons and women.Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.
26.
Home Office. (1999). Probation statistics: England and Wales 1999.London: Research Development and Statistics Directorate.
27.
Hong Kong Government. (1985). Probation of offenders ordinance (Chapter 298). Hong Kong: Government Printer.
28.
Hong Kong Social Welfare Department Corrections Section. (1994). Basic guide for practice in probation service. Unpublished paper. Hong Kong: Social Welfare Department.
29.
JordanJ., KaplanA., MillerJ., StiverI., & SurreyJ. (1991). Women's growth in connection: Writings from the stone center.New York: Guilford Press.
30.
KoonsB., BurrowJ., MorashM., & BynumT. (1997). Expert and offender perceptions of program elements linked to successful outcomes for incarcerated women.Crime and Delinquent, 43(4), 512–32.
31.
KratcoskiP. (1974). Differential treatment of boys and girls by the juvenile justice system.Child Welfare, 53, 16–22.
32.
LauS.K., & KuanH.C. (1988). The ethos of the Hong Kong Chinese.Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
33.
LeeJ.A.B. (2001). The empowerment approach to social work practice: Building the beloved community (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
34.
MairG. (Ed.). (1997). Evaluating the effectiveness of community penalties.Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
35.
McGuireJ. (Ed.). (1995). What works: Reducing re-offending — guidelines from research and practice.Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
36.
NorlandS., & MannP. (1984). Women on probation.Criminal Justice and Behavior.11(1), 115–35.
37.
O'BrianC. (1994). The social welfare department. In GaylordM.S., & TraverH. (Eds.), Introduction to the Hong Kong criminal justice system (pp. 161–72). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
38.
O'BrienP. (2001). ‘Just like baking a cake’: Women describe the necessary ingredients for successful re-entry after incarceration.Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 82(3), 287–95.
39.
O'DwyerJ., & CarlenP. (1985). Josie: Surviving Holloway … and other women's prisons. In CarlenP., HicksJ., O'DwyerJ., ChristinaD., & TchaikovskyC. (Eds.), Criminal women (pp. 138–181), Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
40.
PollockJ.M. (1998). Counseling women in prison.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
RaineP. (2001). Women's perspectives on drugs and alcohol: The vicious circle.Burlington, UK: Ashgate.
42.
RichieB.E. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of battered black women.New York: Routledge.
43.
SargentM. (1992). Women, drugs and policy in Sydney, London and Amsterdam.Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
44.
SheldonB. (1994). Social work effectiveness research: Implications for probation and juvenile justice services.Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(3), 218–35.
45.
SterkC.E. (1999). Fast lives: Women who use cocaine.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
46.
VaggJ. (1998). Delinquency and shame: Data from Hong Kong.British Journal of Criminology, 38(2), 247–64.
47.
Van WormerK.S. (2001). Counseling female offenders and victims: A strengths-restorative approach.New York: Springer.
48.
WarrenR. (1986). The female offender. In TochH. (Ed.), Psychology of crime and criminal justice (pp. 444–69). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
49.
WorrallA. (1989). Working with female offenders: Beyond ‘alternatives to custody'?British Journal of Social Work, 19(2), 77–93.
50.
WorrallA. (1990). Offending women: Female lawbreakers and the criminal justice system.London: Routledge.
51.
YipT.C. (1973). The role of a probation officer. In Social Welfare Department (Ed.), Open day special issue (pp. 8–12). Hong Kong: Social Welfare Department.
