Duplicates or Singletons?—An Analysis of the Need for Replication in Immunoassay and a Computer Program to Calculate the Distribution of Outliers,Error Rate and the Precision Profile from Assay Duplicates
Free accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 1989
Duplicates or Singletons?—An Analysis of the Need for Replication in Immunoassay and a Computer Program to Calculate the Distribution of Outliers,Error Rate and the Precision Profile from Assay Duplicates
The nature, frequency, statistics and methods of detection of both Gaussian and catastrophic errors in immunoassay are described. The method of sequential analysis is applied to the rates of catastrophic errors and is used to calculate the number of results which must be examined in order to achieve a stated confidence that the error rate is acceptable so that a rational decision on use of duplicate or singleton assay can be made. A simple computer program is described, which allows computation of the precision profile and an analysis of errors using accumulated data from duplicate assays. These methods have been applied to an enzyme amplification immunometric assay for thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and an analysis is made of the errors detected in a sample of 1419 patient results.
References
1.
McSwineyRRWoodrowDA. Types of error within a clinical laboratory. J Mol Lab Tech1969; 26: 340–6.
2.
WhitehurstPDiSilvioTVBoyadjianG. Evaluation of discrepancies in patients’ results—an aspect of computer assisted quality control. Clin Chem.1975; 21: 87–92.
3.
GrindonAJEskaPL. Error rate, precision and accuracy in immunohaematology. Transfusion1977; 17: 425–30.
4.
WhiteheadTP. Principles of quality control in clinical chemistry. In: WilsonDWGaskellSJKempKW, eds. Quality Control in Clinical Endocrinology. Cardiff: Alpha Omega, 1981; 3–4.
5.
HealyMJRWhiteheadTP. Outlying values in the national quality control scheme. Ann Clin BioChem.1980; 17: 78–81.
World Association of Societies of Pathology. Analytical goals in clinical chemistry: their relationship to medical care. Am J Clin Pathol.1979; 71: 624–30.
BrowningMCKFordRPCallaghanSJFraserCG. Intra- and interindividual variation of five analytes used in assessing thyroid function: implications for necessary standards of performance and the interpretation of results. Clin Chem.1986; 32: 962–6.
13.
SkendallLPBarnettRNPlattR. Medically useful criteria for analytical performance of laboratory tests. Am J Clin Pathol.1985; 83: 200–5.
14.
FraserCG. Better criteria for desirable laboratory performance exist. Am J Clin Pathol.1986; 85: 251.
15.
RodbardDRayfordPLCooperJARossGT. Statistical quality control of radioimmunoassays. J Clin Endocrinol1968; 28: 1412–18.
16.
HealyMJR. Statistical analysis of radioimmunoassay data. Biochem J1972; 130: 207–10.
17.
EkinsRP. The precision profile: its use in assay design, assessment and quality control. In: HunterWMCorrieJET, eds. Immunoassays in Clinical Chemistry. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone, 1983; 76–105.
18.
BarnettVLewisT. Outliers in statistical data. 2nd ed.Chichester: Wiley, 1984.
19.
HealyMJR. Outliers in clinical chemistry and quality control schemes. Clin Chem.1979; 25: 675–7.
20.
WilsonDWNixABJRowlandsRJ, Analytical performance characteristics and chronobiological considerations in quality control. In: WilsonDWGaskellSJKempKW, eds. Quality Control in Clinical Endocrinology. Cardiff: Alpha Omega, 1981; 5–18.
21.
NicolRSmithPRaggattPR. A robust microcomputer routine for the identification of outlying and influential points in radioimmunoassay standard curves. Comput Biomed Res.1985; 18: 334–46.
22.
FinneyDJ. Statistical computation for immunoassays. In: WilsonDWGaskellSJKempKW, eds. Quality Control in Clinical Endocrinology. Cardiff: Alpha Omega, 1981; 99–106.
23.
WaldA. Sequential Analysis. New York: Wiley, 1947.
24.
ArmitageP. Sequential Medical Trials. 2nd ed.Oxford: Blackwell, 1975.
JohannssonAStanleyCJSelfCH. A fast highly sensitive colorimetric enzyme immunoassay system demonstrating benefits of enzyme amplification in clinical chemistry. Clin Chim Acta1985; 148: 119–24.
27.
StanleyCJJohannssonASelfCH. Enzyme amplification can enhance both the speed and the sensitivity of immunoassays. J Immunol Methods1985; 83: 89–95.
28.
ClarkPMSPriceCP. Enzyme amplified immunoassay: a new ultrasensitive assay of thyrotropin evaluated. Clin Chem.1986; 32: 88–92.
