An evaluation has been carried out of 13 commercial testosterone kits. The within- and between-assay imprecision was found to be unsatisfactory for some kits. Sensitivity and linearity were acceptable for all the kits but several showed concentration-dependent biases to the ALTM or GCMS values. The occurrence of anomalous results and changing performance characteristics of some of the direct kits is also presented.
References
1.
JamesVHTGoodallA. Androgen production in women. In: JeffcoateSL, ed., Androgens and anti-androgen therapy. Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1982.
2.
SaezJMBertrandJ. Studies on testicular function in children: plasma concentration of testosterone, dehydroepiandrotestosterone and its sulphate before and after stimulation with human chorionic gonadotrophin. Steroids1968; 12: 749–61.
3.
AndersonDCMarshallJCYoungJLFraserTR. Stimulation tests of pituitary-leydig cell function in normal male subjects and hypogonadal men. Clin Endocrinol1972; 1: 140–7.
4.
Percy-RobbIWBroughtonPMGJenningsRD, A recommended scheme for the evaluation of kits in the clinical chemistry laboratory. Ann Clin BioChem.1980; 17: 217–26.
5.
WheelerMJShaikhM. In: JenningsRD ed. Evaluation of commercial kits using 125-iodine labelled testosterone in serum or plasma. (1982) DHSS (leaflets), PO Box 21, Stanmore, Middlesex HA7 2AY.
6.
FinlayMMGaskellSJ. Determination of testosterone in plasma from men by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, with high resolution selected-ion monitoring and metastable peak monitoring. Clin Chem.1981; 27: 1165–70.
