Three methods of determining urinary oestrogens are compared. Manual methods are better for intermittent demand but an automated method is desirable when more than 50 analyses per week are required.
References
1.
BrownJ. B.MacleodS. C.MacnaughtonC.SmithM. A.SmythB. A rapid method for estimating oestrogens in urine using a semi-automatic extractor. J. Endocr.42 (1968) 5.
2.
CartlidgeV. K.SpencerP. M.SwyerG. I. M.WoolfA. J.Urinary oestriol determination as an index of placental function. J. Endocr.22 (1961) xvi.
3.
IttrichG. Eine neue methode zur chemischen bestimmung der östrogenen hormone im harn. Z. Physiol. Chem.312 (1958) 1.
4.
MuirG. G.ConaillD.RyanM. The use of fluorimetry in the automated assay of Ittrich's total oestrogens in the urine of pregnant women. Steroids13 (1969) 719.
5.
OakeyR. E.BradshawL. R. A.EcclesS. S.StitchS. R.HeysR. F.The rapid estimation of oestrogens in pregnancy to monitor foetal risk. Clin. chim. Acta15 (1967) 35.
6.
Ua ConaillD.MuirG. G.An automated method for the determination of oestrogens in pregnancy. Clin. Chem.14 (1968) 1010.
