A UK & Ireland national audit of urine acidification

Abstract

Objectives

Acidification of urine samples has long been used as a method of preservation to enhance analyte stability. However, there are inherent safety risks to staff and patients when acid preservatives are used. The Association of Laboratory Medicine National Audit Committee sought to assess urine acidification practices in NHS laboratories.

Method

An 11 question survey was sent to all Association of Laboratory Medicine members for completion between 24th January 2023 and 24th February 2023 and data analysis performed using Microsoft Excel. For a variety of analytes, laboratories were asked to detail the type of recommended and accepted collection containers, whether 24 h and/or spot urine samples were accepted, if preservative was added to samples on receipt if not collected with preservative and the storage conditions for unpreserved samples.

Results

69 laboratories responded. Safety information was provided to users by the majority of laboratories and 88% of laboratories would pH test samples prior to sending them to a referral laboratory if acidification was a prerequisite. Variation was noted in quoted time of sample stability when refrigerated. Laboratories provided answers about specific tests – sodium, potassium, osmolality, calcium, magnesium, phosphate, creatinine, Bence Jones protein, total protein, urate, citrate, oxalate, cysteine, catecholamines, metanephrines, 5-HIAA, VMA/HMMA, copper, amino acids, organics acids and glycosaminoglycans.

Conclusions

There is significant variation in the use of acid as a preservative for urine samples throughout NHS laboratories as well as historical requirements for urine acidification for certain analytes which evidence has indicated is no longer a requirement.