Under various atmospheric conditions, laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is a powerful technique for elemental analysis, including in Earth- and Mars-like environments. However, understanding the plasma behavior and its dependence on ambient pressure and laser parameters remains a challenge. In this study, a numerical model based on a three-temperature Eulerian radiation framework under non-local thermodynamic equilibrium conditions is employed to investigate the interaction of a nanosecond laser pulse with a graphite target under helium (He) and carbon dioxide (CO2 atmospheres. The aim is to provide insights into the effects of focusing conditions and ambient pressure (3 to 9 mbar and 1000 mbar) on plasma parameters relevant to both Earth- and Mars-like settings. Our results show that increased ambient pressure significantly enhances electron and ion densities, while the focusing conditions influence the temperature and fluid velocity of plasma species, as well as the spatial distribution and intensity of the plasma, ultimately affecting its diagnostic potential. These findings are critical for optimizing LIBS applications in planetary exploration and contribute to improving quantitative analyses under varying atmospheric compositions.
NollR.NollR.. Handbook of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy. Berlin: Springer, 2012.
2.
HahnD.W.OmenettoN.. “Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS), Part II: Review of Instrumental and Methodological Approaches to Material Analysis and Applications to Different Fields”. Appl. Spectrosc. 2012. 66(4): 347–419.
3.
MarkushinY.SivakumarP.ConnollyD.MelikechiN.. “Tag-Femtosecond Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy for the Sensitive Detection of Cancer Antigen 125 in Blood Plasma”. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015. 407: 1849–1855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-8433-0
4.
MelikechiN.MarkushinY.ConnollyD.C.LasueJ.Ewusi-AnnanE., et al. “Age-Specific Discrimination of Blood Plasma Samples of Healthy and Ovarian Cancer Prone Mice Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2016. 123: 33–41.
5.
PořízkaP.ModlitbováP.MelikechiN.KaiserJ.. “Laser-Ablation Spectroscopy for Imaging of Tumor Markers and Nanoparticle Labels”. In: Optical Spectroscopy and Imaging for Cancer Diagnostics: Fundamentals, Progress, and Challenges. N. Melikechi, editors. New Jersey: World Scientific Publishing, 2023. Pp. 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811258961_0007.
6.
RehseS.J.SalimniaH.MiziolekA.W.. “Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS): An Overview of Recent Progress and Future Potential for Biomedical Applications”. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 2012. 36(2): 77–89. https://doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2011.645946
7.
LimbeckA.BrunnbauerL.LohningerH.PořízkaP.ModlitbováP., et al. “Methodology and Applications of Elemental Mapping by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy”. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2021. 1147: 72–98.
8.
M.Markiewicz-KeszyckaCama-MoncunillX.Casado-GavaldaM.P.DixitY.et al. “Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) for Food Analysis: A Review”. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017. 65: 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.05.005
9.
AndrewsH.B.MartinM.Z.WymoreA.M.KalluriU.C.. “Rapid In Situ Nutrient Element Distribution in Plants and Soils Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS)”. Plant Soil.2023. 495(2): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-05988-7
10.
DíazD.HahnD.W.MolinaA.. “Evaluation of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) as a Measurement Technique for Evaluation of Total Elemental Concentration in Soils”. Appl. Spectrosc. 2012. 66(1): 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1366/11-06349
MarkushinY.MarcanoA.RockS.MelikechiN.. “Determination of Protein Hydrogen Composition by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy”. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2010. 25(2): 148–149.
SalléB.CremersD.A.MauriceS.WiensR.C.. “Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy for Space Exploration Applications: Influence of the Ambient Pressure on the Calibration Curves Prepared From Soil and Clay Samples”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2005. 60(4): 479–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2005.02.009
15.
WangJ.LiX.LiH.LiX.LiZ.. “Lens-to-Sample Distance Effect on the Quantitative Analysis of Steel by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy”. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2020. 53(25): 255203. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab7f74
16.
SurmickD.M.TalehL.MelikechiN.. “Effects of Laser Beam Focusing Characteristics on Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectra”. Appl. Spectrosc. 2021. 75(2): 127–136.
17.
HouH.LiY.TianY.YuZ.ZhengR.. “Plasma Condensation Effect Induced by Ambient Pressure in Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy”. Appl. Phys. Express. 2014. 7(3): 032402. https://doi.org/10.7567/APEX.7.032402
18.
WiensR.C.MauriceS.BarracloughB.SaccoccioM., et al. “The ChemCam Instrument Suite on the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Rover: Body Unit and Combined System Tests”. Space Sci. Rev. 2012. 170(1): 167–227.
19.
WiensR.C.MauriceS.RobinsonS.H.NelsonA.E., et al. “The SuperCam Instrument Suite on the NASA Mars 2020 Rover: Body Unit and Combined System Tests”. Space Sci. Rev. 2021. 217: 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-020-00777
20.
MelikechiN.MezzacappaA.CousinA.LanzaN.L., et al. “Correcting for Variable Laser–Target Distances of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Measurements With ChemCam Using Emission Lines of Martian Dust Spectra”. Spectrochim. Acta B. 2014. 96: 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2014.04.004
21.
MezzacappaA.MelikechiN.CousinA.WiensR.C., et al. “Application of Distance Correction to ChemCam Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Measurements”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2016. 120: 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2016.03.009
22.
LasueJ.CousinA.MeslinP.-Y.MangoldN., et al. “Martian Eolian Dust Probed by ChemCam”. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2018. 45(20): 10,968–10,977. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079210
23.
WiensR.C.Blazon-BrownA.J.MelikechiN.FrydenvangJ., et al. “Improving ChemCam LIBS Long-Distance Elemental Compositions Using Empirical Abundance Trends”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2021. 182: 106247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2021.106247
24.
Ewusi-AnnanE.SurmickD.M.MelikechiN.WiensR.C.. “Simulated Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectra of Graphite and Synthetic Shergottite Glass Under Martian Conditions”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2018. 148: 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2018.06.006
25.
LiangF.WangJ.FuX.WangH.. “Characteristics of Laser-Induced Steel Plasmas Generated With Different Focusing Conditions”. Appl. Opt. 2023. 62: 6350–6357.
26.
WangQ.ChenA.LiuY.LiS.JinM.. “Comparison of Emission Signals for Femtosecond and Nanosecond Laser-Ablated Cu Plasmas by Changing the Distance from Focusing Lens to Target Surface at Different Target Temperatures”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2021. 185: 106302.
27.
HansenP.B.SchröderS.KubitzaS.RammelkampK., et al. “Modeling of Time-Resolved LIBS Spectra Obtained in Martian Atmospheric Conditions with a Stationary Plasma Approach”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2021. 178: 106115.
28.
CristoforettiG.De GiacomoA.Dell’AglioM.LegnaioliS., et al. “Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium in Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy: Beyond the McWhirter Criterion”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2010. 65(1): 86–95.
29.
AlbertiA.MunafòC.KollM.NishiharaM., et al. “Laser-Induced Non-Equilibrium Plasma Kernel Dynamics”. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2020. 53(2): 025201. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab5409
30.
GlumacN.C.ElliottG.S.. “The Effect of Ambient Pressure on Laser-Induced Plasmas in Air”. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2007. 45: 27–35.
31.
ChenZ.ChenZ.JiangW.GuoL., et al. “Line Intensity Calculation of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy During Plasma Expansion in Nonlocal Thermodynamic Equilibrium”. Opt. Lett. 2023. 48(12): 3227–3230. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.488250.
32.
MacfarlaneJ.J.GolovkinI.WoodruffP.. “HELIOS-CR – A 1-D Radiation-Magnetohydrodynamics Code with Inline Atomic Kinetics Modeling”. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 2006. 99(1–3): 381–397.
33.
MihalasD.MihalasB.W.. Foundations of Radiation Hydrodynamics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.
34.
CastorJ.I.. Radiation Hydrodynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
35.
RezaeiF.TavassoliS.H.. “Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Laser Induced Plasma Spectrum of Aluminum in the Presence of a Noble Gas”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2012. 78: 29–36.
36.
HarilalS.S.MiloshevskyG.V.DiwakarP.K.LaHayeN.L., et al. “Experimental and Computational Study of Complex Shockwave Dynamics in Laser Ablation Plumes in Argon Atmosphere”. Phys. Plasmas. 2012. 19: 083504.
37.
The Flash Center for Computational Science. “FLASH User’s Guide Version-4.6.2”. New York: University of Rochester, 2019.
38.
OrbanC.FatenejadM.ChawlaS.WilksS., et al. “A Radiation-Hydrodynamics Code Comparison for Laser-Produced Plasmas: FLASH Versus HYDRA and the Results of Validation Experiments”. ArXiv. 2013. 7: 63637510.48550/arXiv.1306.1584
39.
LeeD.. “A Solution Accurate, Efficient and Stable Unsplit Staggered Mesh Scheme for Three Dimensional Magnetohydrodynamics”. J. Comput. Phys. 2013. 243: 269.
KaiserT.B.. “Laser Ray Tracing and Power Deposition on an Unstructured Three-Dimensional Grid”. Phys. Rev. E. 2000. 61: 895–905.
42.
TurkM.J.SmithB.D.OishiJ.S.SkoryS., et al. “yt: A Multi-Code Analysis Toolkit for Astrophysical Simulation Data”. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2011. 192: 9. http://yt.enzotools.org/ [accessed Dec 20 2024].
43.
MacFarlane.J.J. “IONMIX: A Code for Computing the Equation of State and Radiative Properties of LTE and Non-LTE Plasmas”. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1989. 56: 259–278.
44.
TzeferacosP.FatenejadM.FlockeN.GrazianiC., et al. “FLASH MHD Simulations of Experiments that Study Shock-Generated Magnetic Fields”. High Energy Density Phys. 2015. 17(Part A): 24.
CousinA.ForniO.MauriceS.GasnaultO., et al. “Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Library for the Martian Environment”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2011. 66(11–12): 805–814.
47.
SchröderS.PavlovS.G.RauschenbachI.JessbergerE.K., et al. “Detection and Identification of Salts and Frozen Salt Solutions Combining Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy and Multivariate Analysis Methods: A Study for Future Martian Exploration“. Icarus. 2013. 223(1): 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2012.11.011
48.
TzeferacosP.FatenejadM.FlockeN.GregoriG., et al. “FLASH Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Shock-Generated Magnetic Field Experiments”. High Energy Density Phys. 2012. 8: 322–328.
49.
FuW.LiangE.P.FatenejadM.LambD.Q., et al. “Increase of the Density, Temperature and Velocity of Plasma Jets Driven by a Ring of High Energy Laser Beams”. High Energy Density Phys. 2013. 9: 336–340.
50.
MasnaviM.ParchamyH.. “Calculation of the Extreme-Ultraviolet Radiation Conversion Efficiency for a Laser-Produced Tin Plasma Source”. Phys. Open. 2019. 1: 100003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physo.2019.100003
51.
HarilalS.S.BindhuC.V.TillackM.S.NajmabadiF., et al. “Internal Structure and Expansion Dynamics of Laser Ablation Plumes Into Ambient Gases”. J. Appl. Phys. 2003. 93: 2380. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1544070
52.
LeH.C.ZeitounD.E.ParisseJ.D.. “Modeling of Gas Dynamics for a Laser-Generated Plasma: Propagation into Low-Pressure Gases”. Phys. Rev. E. 2000. 62: 4152. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.62.4152
53.
DawoodM.S.MargotJ.. “Effect of Ambient Gas Pressure and Nature on the Temporal Evolution of Aluminum Laser-Induced Plasmas”. AIP Adv. 2014. 4: 037111. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4869076
54.
VorsE.GallouC.SalmonL.. “Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy of Carbon in Helium and Nitrogen at High Pressure”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A. 2008. 63(10): 1198–1204.
55.
HarilalS.S.BindhuC.V.IssacR.C.NampooriV.P.N., et al. “Electron Density and Temperature Measurements in a Laser Produced Carbon Plasma”. J. Appl. Phys. 1997. 82: 2140.
56.
StetzlerJ.TangS.ChinniR.C. “Plasma Temperature and Electron Density Determination Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) in Earth’s and Mars’s Atmospheres”. Atoms. 2020. 8(3): 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms8030050
57.
HansenP.B.SchroderS.KubitzaS.RammelkampK.VogtD.S., et al. “Modeling of Time-Resolved LIBS Spectra Obtained in Martian Atmospheric Conditions with a Stationary Plasma Approach”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2021. 178: 106.
58.
SzilagyiJ.ParchamyH.MasnaviM.RichardsonM.. “Spectral Irradiance of Singly and Doubly Ionized Zinc in Low-Intensity Laser-Plasma Ultraviolet Light Sources”. J. Appl. Phys. 2017. 121: 033303. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4973848
ParchamyH.John SzilagyiJ.MasnaviM.RichardsonM.. “Quantitative Analysis of Vacuum-Ultraviolet Radiation from Nanosecond Laser-Zinc Interaction”. Opt. Laser Technol. 2018. 103: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.01.006
62.
ChenZ.BleinerD.BogaertsA.. “Effect of Ambient Pressure on Laser Ablation and Plume Expansion Dynamics: A Numerical Simulation”. J. Appl. Phys. 2006. 99(6): 063304.
63.
HermannJ.LorussoA.PerroneA.StrafellaF., et al. “Simulation of Emission Spectra from Nonuniform Reactive Laser-Induced Plasmas”. Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids, Relat. Interdiscip. Top. 2015. 92: 5.
HarilalS.S.BindhuC.V.TillackM.S.NajmabadiF., et al. “Internal Structure and Expansion Dynamics of Laser Ablation Plumes Into Ambient Gases”. J. Appl. Phys. 2003. 93: 2380. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1544070
66.
BashirS.FaridN.MahmoodK.RafiqueM.S. “Influence of Ambient Gas and Its Pressure on the Laser-induced Breakdown Spectroscopy and the Surface Morphology of Laser Ablated Cd”. Appl. Phys. A. 2012. 107: 203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-011-6730-4
67.
IidaY.. “Effects of Atmosphere on Laser Vaporization and Excitation Processes of Solid Samples”. Spectrosc. Acta, Part B. 1990. 45: 1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/0584-8547(90)80188-O
68.
DawoodM.S.MargotJ.. “Effect of Ambient Gas Pressure and Nature on the Temporal Evolution of Aluminum Laser Induced Plasmas”. AIP Adv. 2014. 4: 037111. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4869076
69.
IrimiciucS.A.HodoroabaB.C.BulaicG.GurluiS.. “Multiple Structure Formation and Molecule Dynamics in Transient Plasmas Generated by Laser Ablation of Graphite”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2020. 165: 105774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2020.105774
70.
HarilalS.S.O’ShayB.TaoY.TillackM.S. “Ambient Gas Effects on the Dynamics of Laser-Produced Tin Plume Expansion”. J. Appl. Phys. 2006. 99: 083303. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2188084
71.
LiX.WeiW.WuJ.JiaS.QiuA.. “The Influence of Spot Size on the Expansion Dynamics of Nanosecond-Laser-Produced Copper Plasmas in Atmosphere”. J. Appl. Phys. 2013. 113: 243304.
72.
J.MartanKunesJ.SemmarN.. "Experimental Mathematical Model of Nanosecond Laser Interaction with Material”. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006. 253(7): 3525–3532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.07.059
73.
ReadyJ.F.. Effect of High Power Laser Radiation. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
74.
PietanzaL.ColonnaG.GiacomoA.D.CapitelliM.. “Kinetic Processes for Laser Induced Plasma Diagnostic: A Collisional-Radiative Model Approach”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2010. 65(8): 616–626.
75.
DelgadoT.García-GómezL.CabalínL.M.LasernaJ.J. “Investigation on the Origin of Molecular Emissions in Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Under Mars-Like Atmospheric Conditions of Isotope-Labeled Compounds of Interest in Astrobiology”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B. 2021. 179: 106114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2020.106114
76.
DongM.LuJ.YaoS.ZhongZ.LiJ., et al. “Experimental Study on the Characteristics of Molecular Emission Spectroscopy for the Analysis of Solid Materials Containing C and N”. Opt. Express. 2011. 19(18): 17021–17029. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.017021
