The aim of this work was the development and morphological/chemical, spectroscopic, and structural characterization of titanium dioxide, niobium pentoxide, and titanium:niobium (Ti:Nb) oxides, as well as materials modified with ruthenium (Ru) with the purpose of providing improvement in photoactivation capacity with visible sunlight radiation. The new materials synthesized using the sol-gel methodology were characterized using the following techniques: scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The SEM–EDS analyses showed the high purity of the bases, and the modified samples showed the adsorption of ruthenium on the surface with the crystals’ formation and visible agglomerates for higher calcination temperature. The nondestructive characterization of PAS in the ultraviolet visible region suggested that increasing calcination temperature promoted changes in chemical structures and an apparent decrease in gap energy. The separation of superimposed absorption bands referring to charge transfers from the ligand to the metal and the nanodomains of the transition metals suggested the possible absorption centers present at the absorption threshold of the analyzed oxides. Through the XRD analysis, the formation of stable phases such as T-Nb16.8O42, o-Nb12O29, and rutile was observed at a lower temperature level, suggesting pore induction and an increase in surface area for the oxides studied, at a calcination temperature below that expected by the related literature. In addition, the synthesis with a higher temperature level altered the previously existing morphologies of the Ti:Nb, base and modified with Ru, forming the new mixed crystallographic phases Ti2Nb10O29 and TiNb2O7, respectively. As several semiconductor oxide applications aim to reduce costs with photoexcitation under visible light, the modified Ti:Ru oxide calcined at a temperature of 800 °C and synthesized according to the sol-gel methodology used in this work is suggested as the optimum preparation point. This study presented the formation of a stable crystallographic phase (rutile), a significant decrease in gap energy (2.01 eV), and a visible absorption threshold (620 nm).
DharmaH.N.C.JaafarJ.WidiastutiN.MatsuyamaH., et al. “A Review of Titanium Dioxide (TiO2)-Based Photocatalyst for Oilfield-Produced Water Treatment”. Membranes. 2022. 12(3): 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12030345
2.
FerreiraI.V.L.DanielL.A.. “Fotocatálise Heterogênea com TiO2 Aplicada ao Tratamento de Esgoto Sanitário Secundário”. Eng. Sanit. Ambient. 2004. 9(4): 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-41522004000400011
3.
SuriR.P.S.LiuJ.HandD.W.CrittendenJ.C., et al. “Heterogeneous Photocatalytic Oxidation of Hazardous Organic Contaminants in Water”. Water Environ. Res. 1993. 65(5): 665–673. https://doi.org/10.2175/WER.65.5.9
4.
ZhuX.-D.WangY.-J.SunR.-J.ZhouD.-M.. “Photocatalytic Degradation of Tetracycline in Aqueous Solution by Nanosized TiO2”. Chemosphere. 2013. 92(8): 925–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.02.066
5.
MontiniT.GombacV.SordelliL.DelgadoJ.J., et al. “Nanostructured Cu/TiO2 Photocatalysts for H2 Production from Ethanol and Glycerol Aqueous Solutions”. ChemCatChem. 2011. 3(3): 574–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201000289
AkshathaS.SreenivasaS.KumarK.Y.ArchanaS., et al. “Rutile, Mesoporous Ruthenium Oxide Decorated Graphene Oxide as an Efficient Visible Light Driven Photocatalyst for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction and Organic Pollutant Degradation”. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2020. 116: 105156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2020.105156
9.
PinedaA.LázaroN.BaluA.M.GarciaA., et al. “Evaluation of Acid Properties of Mechanochemically Synthesized Supported Niobium Oxide Catalysts in the Alkylation of Toluene”. Mol. Catal. 2020. 493: 111092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2020.111092
10.
GonçalvesM.OliveiraL.C.A.GuerreiroM.C.. “Nióbia Magnética Como Adsorvente de Contaminantes Orgânicos em Meio Aquoso: Efeito da Temperatura e do pH”. Quím. Nova. 2008. 31(3): 518–522. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422008000300010
LopesO.F.ParisE.C.RibeiroC.. “Synthesis of Nb2O5 Nanoparticles Through the Oxidant Peroxide Method Applied to Organic Pollutant Photodegradation: A Mechanistic Study”. Appl. Catal., B. 2014. 144: 800–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.08.031
13.
LopesO.F.MendonçaV.R.D.SilvaF.B.F.ParisE.C., et al. “Niobium Oxides: An Overview of the Synthesis of Nb2O5 and its Application in Heterogeneous Photocatalysis”. Quím. Nova. 2015. 38(1): 106–117. https://doi.org/10.5935/0100-4042.20140280
14.
CavalcantiR.M.BarrosI.D.C.L.DiasJ.A.DiasS.C.L.. “Characterization of ZSM-5 Modified with Niobium Pentoxide: The Study of Thiophene Adsorption”. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2013. 24(1): 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532013000100007
15.
AbreuE.FidelisM.Z.FuzikiM.E.MalikoskiR.M., et al. “Degradation of Emerging Contaminants: Effect of Thermal Treatment on Nb2O5 as Photocatalyst”. J. Photochem. Photobiol. 2021. 419: 113484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2021.113484
16.
SaccoO.MurciaJ.J.LaraA.E.Hernández-LaverdeM., et al. “Pt–TiO2–Nb2O5 Heterojunction as Effective Photocatalyst for the Degradation of Diclofenac and Ketoprofen”. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2020. 107: 104839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2019.104839
17.
IervolinoG.VaianoV.MurciaJ.J.LaraA.E., et al. “Photocatalytic Production of Hydrogen and Methane from Glycerol Reforming Over Pt/TiO2–Nb2O5”. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2021. 46(78): 38678–38691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.09.111
18.
FuzikiM.E.K.AbreuE.De CarvalhoA.E.SilvaL.H.B.O., et al. “Sol–Gel Fe/TiO2 Magnetic Catalysts Applied to Selenium Photoreduction”. Top. Catal. 2020. 63: 1131–1144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-020-01276-1
19.
FuzikiM.E.K.BrackmannR.DiasD.T.TussetA.M., et al. “Effects of Synthesis Parameters on the Properties and Photocatalytic Activity of the Magnetic Catalyst TiO2/CoFe2O4 Applied to Selenium Photoreduction”. J. Water Proc. Engineering. 2021. 42: 102163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102163
20.
NadalJ.M.dos Anjos CamargoG.NovatskiA.MacenhanW.R., et al. “Adapalene-Loaded Poly(Ε-Caprolactone) Microparticles: Physicochemical Characterization and In Vitro Penetration by Photoacoustic Spectroscopy”. PLoS One. 2019. 14(3): e0213625. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213625
21.
DrabeskiR.G.GunhaJ.V.NovatskiA.de SouzaG.B., et al. “Raman and Photoacoustic Spectroscopies of SnO2 Thin Films Deposited by Spin Coating Technique”. Vib. Spectrosc. 2020. 109: 103094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vibspec.2020.103094
22.
TaucJ.GrigoroviciR.VancuA.. “Optical Properties and Electronic Structure of Amorphous Germanium”. Phys. Status Solidi B. 1966. 15(2): 627–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.19660150224
23.
ChallagullaS.TarafderK.GanesanR.RoyS.. “Structure Sensitive Photocatalytic Reduction of Nitroarenes Over TiO2”. Sci. Rep. 2017. 7(1): 8783. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08599-2
24.
LiT.NamG.LiuK.WangJ.-H., et al. “A Niobium Oxide with a Shear Structure and Planar Defects for High-Power Lithium-Ion Batteries”. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022. 15(1): 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EE02664J
25.
PradoA.G.S.L.B.BolzonPedrosoC.P.MouraA.O., et al. “Nb2O5 as Efficient and Recyclable Photocatalyst for Indigo Carmine Degradation”. Appl. Catal., B. 2008. 82(3–4): 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.01.024
26.
AdhamiT.Ebrahimi-KahrizsangiR.Bakhsheshi-RadH.R.MajidiS., et al. “Synthesis and Electrochemical Properties of TiNb2O7 and Ti2Nb10O29 Anodes Under Various Annealing Atmospheres”. Metals. 2021. 11(6): 983. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11060983
27.
LinC.HuL.ChengC.SunK., et al. “Nano-TiNb2O7/Carbon Nanotubes Composite Anode for Enhanced Lithium-Ion Storage”. Electroch. Acta. 2018. 260: 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.051
28.
IseK.MorimotoS.HaradaY.TakamiN.. “Large Lithium Storage in Highly Crystalline TiNb2O7 Nanoparticles Synthesized by a Hydrothermal Method as Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries”. Solid State Ion. 2018. 320: 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2018.02.027
29.
RosencwaigA.GershoA.. “Theory of the Photoacoustic Effect with Solids”. J. Appl. Phys. 1976. 47: 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.322296
30.
NovatskiA.SomerA.MaranhaF.G.de SouzaE.C.F., et al. “Effect of Magnetic Coupling on Non-Radiative Relaxation Time of Fe3+ Sites on LaAl1−xFexO3 Pigments”. J. Appl. Phys. 2018. 123(7): 075101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4998642
31.
AronneA.FantauzziM.ImparatoC.AtzeiD., et al. “Electronic Properties of TiO2-Based Materials Characterized by High Ti3+ Self-Doping and Low Recombination Rate of Electron–Hole Pairs”. RSC Adv. 2017. 7(4): 2373–2381. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA27111A
32.
CarnitiP.GervasiniA.MarzoM.. “Dispersed NbOx Catalytic Phases in Silica Matrixes: Influence of Niobium Concentration and Preparative Route”. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2008. 112(36): 14064–14074. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp803140x
33.
SaleiroG.T.CardosoS.L.ToledoR.HolandaJ.N.F.. “Avaliação das Fases Cristalinas de Dióxido de Titânio Suportado em Cerâmica Vermelha”. Cerâmica. 2010. 56(338): 162–167. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0366-69132010000200011
34.
FalkG.S.BorlafM.López-MuñozM.J.FariñasJ.C., et al. “Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of TiO2 Nanoparticles: Photocatalytic Activity of Powders and Thin Films”. J. Nanopart. Res. 2018. 20(2): 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4140-7
35.
LiuH.MaH.T.LiX.Z.LiW.Z., et al. “The Enhancement of TiO2 Photocatalytic Activity by Hydrogen Thermal Treatment”. Chemosphere. 2003. 50(1): 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00486-1
XiangJ.LoL.T.-L.LeungC.-F.YiuS.-M., et al. “Synthesis, Structures, and Photophysical Properties of Ruthenium(II) Quinolinolato Complexes”. Organometallics. 2012. 31(20): 7101–7108. https://doi.org/10.1021/om300621x
38.
YeatesR.C.KuznickiS.M.LloydL.B.EyringE.M.. “Tris(2,2′-Bipyridine) Ruthenium(II) Electron-Transfer in a Layered Zirconium Phosphate Lattice”. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1981. 43(10): 2355–2358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1902(81)80264-3
39.
ChenY.-F.LeeC.-Y.YengM.-Y.ChiuH.-T.. “The Effect of Calcination Temperature on the Crystallinity of TiO2 Nanopowders”. J. Cryst. Growth. 2003. 247(3–4): 363–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(02)01938-3
40.
GraçaM.P.F.MeirelesA.NicoC.ValenteM.A.. “Nb2O5 Nanosize Powders Prepared by Sol–Gel: Structure, Morphology, and Dielectric Properties”. J. Alloys Compd. 2013. 553: 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.11.128
41.
AraújoD.D.S.DinizV.C.D.S.TorquatoR.A.CostaA.C.F.D.M.. “Avaliação Gap Óptico do TiO2 Obtido pelo Método Pechini: Influência da Variação das Fases Anatásio-Rutilo”. Matéria. 2018. 23(1): e–11949. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-707620170001.0285
42.
KudoA.MisekiY.. “Heterogeneous Photocatalyst Materials for Water Splitting”. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009. 38(1): 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1039/B800489G
43.
BraynerR.Bozon-VerdurazF.. “Niobium Pentoxide Prepared by Soft Chemical Routes: Morphology, Structure, Defects, and Quantum Size Effect”. Phys. Chem. 2003. 5(7): 1457–1466. https://doi.org/10.1039/B210055J
44.
IostK.N.BorisovV.A.TemerevV.L.SurovikinY.V., et al. “Study on the Metal-Support Interaction in the Ru/C Catalysts Under Reductive Conditions”. Surf. Interfaces. 2018. 12: 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2018.05.003
45.
MihaiS.CursaruD.L.MateiD.MantaA.M., et al. “Rutile RuxTi1–xO2 Nanobelts to Enhance Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity”. Sci. Rep. 2019. 9(1): 18798. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55446-7
46.
StreamerR.W.. “What NIR Instruments to Use”. In: HarrisP.J.AltanerC.M., editors. Workshop on Commercial Application of IR Spectroscopies to Solid Wood. Christchurch, New Zealand: Wood Technology Research Centre, University of Canterbury, 2013. Chap. 2, Pp. 3–16.
47.
EldinA.B.. “Near Infra Red Spectroscopy”. In: AkyarI., editor. Wide Spectra of Quality Control. Rijeka: IntechOpen, 2011. Chap. 13, Pp. 237–248. https://doi.org/10.5772/24208
48.
De OliveiraM.G.PessoaO.VargasH.GalembeckF.. “Low-Density Polyethylene Depth Profile Analysis by Photoacoustic Spectroscopy”. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1988. 35(7): 1791–1802. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1988.070350707
49.
LiG.ZhangX.PengC.ShangM., et al. “Cyan-Emitting Ti4+- and Mn2+-Coactivated Mg2SnO4 as a Potential Phosphor to Enlarge the Color Gamut for Field Emission Display”. J. Mater. Chem. 2011. 21(18): 6477. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm00057h
50.
BourguibaM.RaddaouiZ.ChafraM.DhahriJ.. “The Investigation of Structural and Vibrational Properties and Optical Behavior of Ti-Doped La0.67Ba0.25Ca0.08Mn(1−x)TixO3 (x = 0.00, 0.05, and 0.10) Manganites”. RSC Adv. 2019. 9(72): 42252–42261. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA07407D
HuX.-K.WuB.YangY.YeungY.Y., et al. “An Old System Revisited: Al2O3:Ti3+–Microscopic Crystal Field Effects Explored by the Crystal Field and First-Principles Calculations”. J. Alloys Compd. 2020. 847: 156459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156459
53.
LiK.HuangZ.ZengX.HuangB., et al. “Synergetic Effect of Ti3+ and Oxygen Doping on Enhancing Photoelectrochemical and Photocatalytic Properties of TiO2/g-C3N4 Heterojunctions”. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017. 9(13): 11577–11586. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b16191
54.
MoraisE.O’ModhrainC.ThampiK.R.SullivanJ.A.. “RuO2/TiO2 Photocatalysts Prepared via a Hydrothermal Route: Influence of the Presence of TiO2 on the Reactivity of RuO2 in the Artificial Photosynthesis Reaction”. J. Catal. 2021. 401: 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2021.08.007
55.
BarnesP.ZuoY.DixonK.HouD., et al. “Electrochemically Induced Amorphous-to-Rock-Salt Phase Transformation in Niobium Oxide Electrode for Li-Ion Batteries”. Nat. Mater. 2022. 21(7): 795–803. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-022-01242-0
56.
WenH.ChengB.-M.TannerP.A.. “Optical Properties of Selected 4d and 5d Transition Metal Ion-Doped Glasses”. RSC Adv. 2017. 7(42): 26411–26419. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA04062H
57.
DiasD.T.SalesM.V.G.NakamuraO.OliveiraM.Q., et al. “Phase-Resolved Photoacoustic Spectroscopy to Monitor Dental Plaque on Tooth Enamel”. Spectrosc. Lett. 2018. 51(2): 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00387010.2018.1425727
58.
MoreiraN.F.F.SousaJ.M.MacedoG.RibeiroA.R., et al. “Photocatalytic Ozonation of Urban Wastewater and Surface Water Using Immobilized TiO2 with LEDs: Micropollutants, Antibiotic Resistance Genes, and Estrogenic Activity”. Water Res. 2016. 94: 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.003
MoraisL.A.AdánC.AraujoA.S.GuedesA.P.M.A., et al. “Synthesis, Characterization, and Photonic Efficiency of Novel Photocatalytic Niobium Oxide Materials”. Glob. Chall. 2017. 1(9): 1700066. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201700066
61.
KhalilK.M.S.ZakiM.I.. “Synthesis of High Surface Area Titania Powders via Basic Hydrolysis of Titanium(IV) Isopropoxide”. Powder Technol. 1997. 92(3): 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-5910(97)03250-6
62.
YanJ.WuG.GuanN.LiL.. “Nb2O5/TiO2 Heterojunctions: Synthesis Strategy and Photocatalytic Activity”. Appl. Catal., B. 2014. 152–153: 280–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.01.049
63.
Von DreeleR.B.CheethamA.K.. “The Structures of Some Titanium-Niobium Oxides by Powder Neutron Diffraction”. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A. 1974. 338(1614): 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1974.0088
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
