Raman Spectroscopy as an Effective Tool for Assessment of Structural Quality and Polymorphism of Gallium Oxide (Ga 2 O 3 ) Thin Films

Abstract

Raman spectroscopy, a versatile and nondestructive technique, was employed to develop a methodology for gallium oxide (Ga₂O₃) phase detection and identification. This methodology combines experimental results with a comprehensive literature survey. The established Raman approach offers a powerful tool for nondestructively assessing phase purity and detecting secondary phases in Ga₂O₃ thin films. X-ray diffraction was used for comparison, highlighting the complementary information that these techniques may provide for Ga₂O₃ characterization. Few case studies are included to demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed spectroscopic approach, namely the impact of deposition conditions such as metal–organic vapor-phase epitaxy and pulsed electron deposition (PED), and extrinsic elements provided during growth (Sn in the case of PED) on Ga₂O₃ polymorphism. In conclusion, it is shown that Raman spectroscopy offers a quick, reliable, and nondestructive high-resolution approach for Ga₂O₃ thin film characterization, especially concerning phase detection and crystalline quality.

Graphical abstract

This is a visual representation of the abstract.

Keywords

Raman spectroscopy gallium oxide thin films polymorphs

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Pearton

S.J.

Yang

Cary

P.H.

Ren

, et al. “A Review of Ga₂O₃ Materials, Processing, and Devices”. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2018. 5(1): 011301. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5006941

Bosi

Mazzolini

Seravalli

Fornari

. “Ga₂O₃ Polymorphs: Tailoring the Epitaxial Growth Conditions”. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2020. 8(32): 10975. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TC02743J

Mazzolini

Falkenstein

Wouters

Schewski

, et al. “Substrate-Orientation Dependence of β-Ga₂O₃ (100), (010), (001), and (201) Homoepitaxy by Indium-Mediated Metal-Exchange Catalyzed Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MEXCAT-MBE)”. APL Mater. 2020. 8(1): 011107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5135772

Orita

Ohta

Hirano

Hosono

. “Deep-Ultraviolet Transparent Conductive β Thin Films”. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000. 77(25): 4166. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1330559

Neal

A.T.

Mou

Rafique

Zao

, et al. “Donors and Deep Acceptors in β-Ga₂O₃”. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018. 113(6): 062101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5034474

Ahmadi

Oshima

. “Materials Issues and Devices of α- and β-Ga₂O₃”. J. Appl. Phys. 2019. 126(16): 160901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5123213

Shinohara

Fujita

. “Heteroepitaxy of Corundum-Structured α-Ga₂O₃ Thin Films on α-Al₂O₃ Substrates by Ultrasonic Mist Chemical Vapor Deposition”. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2008. 47(9R): 7311. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.47.7311

Kaneko

Kawanowa

Ito

Fujita

. “Evaluation of Misfit Relaxation in α-Ga₂O₃ Epitaxial Growth on α-Al₂O₃ Substrate”. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2012. 51(2R): 020201. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.51.020201

Tang

Jiang

Cabral

M.J.

, et al. “Atomic-Scale Investigation of γ-Ga₂O₃ Deposited on MgAl₂O₄ and Its Relationship with β-Ga₂O₃”. APL Mater. 2024. 12(1): 011109. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0180922

10.

Ranga

Cho

S.B.

Mishra

Krishnamoorthy

“Highly Tunable, Polarization-Engineered Two-Dimensional Electron Gas in ε-AlGaO₃/ε-Ga₂O₃ Heterostructures”. Appl. Phys. Express. 2020. 13: 061009. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.13941

11.

Cora

Mezzadri

Boschi

Bosi

, et al. “The Real Structure of ε-Ga₂O₃ and Its Relation to κ-Phase”. Cryst. Eng. Comm. 2017. 19(11): 1509–1516. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CE00123A

12.

Oshima

Villora

E.G.

Shimamura

“Epitaxial Growth of Phase-Pure ε-Ga₂O₃ by Halide Vapor Phase Epitaxy”. Appl. Phys. Express. 2015. 8(118): 055501. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4929417

13.

Jubu

P.R.

Yam

F.K.

Obaseki

O.S.

Yusof

. “Synthesis and Characterization of Gallium Oxide in Strong Reducing Growth Ambient by Chemical Vapor Deposition”. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2021. 121: 105361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2020.105361

14.

Kim

H.W.

Kim

N.H.

. “MOCVD Growth and Annealing of Gallium Oxide Thin Film and Its Structural Characterization”. Mater. Sci. Forum. 2005. 475–479: 3377–3380. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.475-479.3377

15.

Mobtakeri

Akaltun

Ozer

Kılıç

, et al. “Gallium Oxide Films Deposition by RF Magnetron Sputtering; a Detailed Analysis on the Effects of Deposition Pressure and Sputtering Power and Annealing”. Ceram. Int. 2021. 47(2): 1721–1727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.08.289

16.

Petitmangin

Gallas

Hebert

Perrière

, et al. “Characterization of Oxygen Deficient Gallium Oxide Films Grown by PLD”. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013. 278: 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.10.136

17.

Nepal

Katzer

D.S.

Meyer

D.J.

. “MBE Growth and Characterization of Gallium Oxide”. In: Pearton

Ren

Mastro

, editors. Gallium Oxide: Technology, Devices, and Applications (Metal Oxides). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2019. Chap. 2, Pp. 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814521-0.00002-6

18.

Tak

B.R.

Kumar

Kapoor

A.K.

Wang

, et al. “Recent Advances in the Growth of Gallium Oxide Thin Films Employing Various Growth Techniques: A Review”. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2021. 54(45): 453002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ac1af2

19.

Mazzer

Rampino

Gombia

Bronzoni

, et al. “Progress on Low-Temperature Pulsed Electron Deposition of CuInGaSe₂ Solar Cells”. Energies. 2016. 9(3): 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9030207

20.

Shklovskii

B.I.

Ėfros

A.L.

. Electronic Properties of Doped Semiconductors. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 1984.

21.

Higashiwaki

Sasaki

Kuramata

Masui

Yamakoshi

. “Gallium Oxide (Ga₂O₃) Metal-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors on Single-Crystal β-Ga₂O₃ (010) Substrates”. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012. 100(1): 013504. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3674287

22.

Alonso-Orts

Sánchez

A.M.

Nogales

Méndez

. “Ge Incorporation in Gallium Oxide Nanostructures Grown by Thermal Treatment”. J. Mater. Sci. 2020. 55: 11431–11438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04859-1

23.

Takakura

Funasaki

Tsunoda

Ohyama

, et al. “Investigation of the Si Doping Effect in β-Ga₂O₃ Films by Co-Sputtering of Gallium Oxide and Si”. Phys. B. 2012. 407(15): 2900–2902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2011.08.061

24.

Mazzolini

Fogarassy

Parisini

Mezzadri

, et al. “Silane-Mediated Expansion of Domains in Si-Doped κ-Ga₂O₃ Epitaxy and its Impact on the In-Plane Electronic Conduction”. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022. 33(2): 2207821. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202207821

25.

Bhandari

Lyons

J.L.

Wickramaratne

Zvanut

M.E.

. “Optical Transitions of Neutral Mg in Mg-Doped β-Ga₂O₃”. APL Mater. 2022. 10(2): 021103. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0081925

26.

Huang

Tang

. “Stabilization and Enhanced Energy Gap by Mg Doping in ε-Phase Ga₂O₃ Thin Films”. AIP Adv. 2018. 8(2): 025008. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5022600

27.

Grümbel

Goldhahn

Jeon

D.-W.

Feneberg

. “Anharmonicity of Lattice Vibrations in Thin Film α-Ga₂O₃ Investigated by Temperature Dependent Raman Spectroscopy”. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2022. 120(2): 022104. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0074260

28.

Janzen

B.M.

Mazzolini

Gillen

Peltason

V.F.S.

, et al. “Comprehensive Raman Study of Orthorhombic κ/ε-Ga₂O₃ and the Impact of Rotational Domains”. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2021. 9(40): 14175–14189. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TC03500B

29.

Janzen

B.M.

Mazzolini

Gillen

Falkenstein

, et al. “Isotopic Study of Raman Active Phonon Modes in β-Ga₂O₃”. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2021. 9(7): 2311–2320. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TC04101G

30.

Onuma

Fujioka

Yamaguchi

Itoh

, et al. “Polarized Raman Spectra in β-Ga₂O₃ Single Crystals”. J. Cryst. Growth. 2014. 401: 330–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.12.061

31.

Castillo

Garcia-Perez

Huq

. “Optimized Growth of Gallium Oxide Thin Films Using Different Synthesis Processes”. J. Electron. Mater. 2019. 48: 536–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-018-6746-z

32.

Ohno

Iizuka

Fujita

. “Pure Rotational Raman Spectroscopy Applied to N₂/O₂ Analysis of Air Bubbles in Polar Firn”. J. Glaciol. 2021. 67(265): 903–908. https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.40

33.

Vogt

Brandt

Riechert

Lähnemann

Bierwagen

. “Metal-Exchange Catalysis in the Growth of Sesquioxides: Towards Heterostructures of Transparent Oxide Semiconductors”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017. 119(19): 196001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.196001

34.

Kracht

Karg

Schörmann

Weinhold

, et al. “Tin-Assisted Synthesis of ε-Ga₂O₃ by Molecular Beam Epitaxy”. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2017. 8(5): 054002. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.054002

35.

Bierwagen

Vogt

Mazzolini

. “Plasma-Assisted Molecular Beam Epitaxy 2: Fundamentals of Suboxide-Related Growth Kinetics, Thermodynamics, Catalysis, Polymorphs, and Faceting”. In: Higashiwaki

Fujita

, editors. Gallium Oxide: Materials Properties, Crystal Growth, and Devices. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2020. Vol. 293, Pp. 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37153-1_6

36.

Kneiss

Hassa

Splith

Sturm

, et al. “Tin-Assisted Heteroepitaxial PLD-Growth of k-Ga₂O₃ Thin Films with High Crystalline Quality”. APL Mater. 2019. 7(2): 022516. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054378

37.

Mazzolini

Wouters

Albrecht

Falkenstein

, et al. “Molecular Beam Epitaxy of β-(InxGa1–x)₂O₃ on β-Ga₂O₃ (010): Compositional Control, Layer Quality, Anisotropic Strain Relaxation, and Prospects for Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Confinement”. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2024. 16(10): 12793–12804. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c19095

38.

Ardenghi

Bierwagen

Lähnemann

Kler

, et al. “Phase-Selective Growth of κ- vs. β-Ga₂O₃ and (InxGa1−x)₂O₃ by In-Mediated Metal Exchange Catalysis in Plasma-Assisted Molecular Beam Epitaxy”. arXiv. 2023. 2311.13318. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.13318v1

39.

Kneiss

Hassa

Splith

Sturm

, et al. “Epitaxial Stabilization of Single Phase κ-(InxGa1−x)₂O₃ Thin Films up to _x=0.28 on c-Sapphire and κ-Ga₂O₃(001) Templates by Tin-Assisted VCCS-PLD”. APL Mater. 2019. 7(10): 101102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5120578