Abstract
For almost eighty years, economists have repeatedly maligned the Robinson-Patman Act. While some of this is justified, I argue that it can improve and, at times, has improved, consumer surplus. In this article, I examine the consumer effects of price discrimination and discuss three Robinson-Patman cases and their positive effects on consumer welfare. I then discuss the recent theoretical and empirical literature on the welfare effects of price discrimination.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.