Abstract
The mobile communication sector is often used as an example to support claims that the FRAND regime is broken because of the risk of hold-up and royalty stacking. Based on an analysis of market-related data, this article argues that the allegations that hold-up and royalty stacking have been pervasive in the mobile communication sector are implausible. The analyzed data reveal no adverse consequences of hold-up and royalty stacking in terms of harm to the standard-setting process, reductions in the rate of innovation, or levels of R&D investment: It is alleged that those seeking to justify the significant reforms to the FRAND regime on the basis of hold-up and royalty stacking have not met the burden of proof that these reforms are necessary or even desirable.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
