Abstract
Multichannel cochlear implants (CIs) allow many profoundly deaf children to achieve high levels of speech perception. In order to develop optimal criteria for implantation, it is crucial to test representative samples (or, if possible, full populations) of CI users and compare their results to those of hearing aid (HA) users of the same age and communication mode (oral or total communication) to determine which subgroups of HA users may obtain more perceptual benefit from a CI than from an HA. Word and phoneme identification skills of deaf children who use either HAs or CIs were evaluated and compared. The CI group included all of the prelingually deaf children in the United States who were implanted with the CLARION® Multi-Strategy™ Cochlear Implant during the clinical trial (as of January 1998). Before implantation, the mean scores on the PB-K test (scored phonemically) were lower for prospective CI users than for HA users. However, by 12 to 18 months postimplantation, the average scores for the CI users were higher than those of HA users with residual hearing in the 1010– to 110–dB hearing level (HL) range. The CI scores were similar to those of HA users with residual hearing in the 90– to 100–dB HL range.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.