Relationship between Eabr Thresholds and Levels Used to Program the Clarion® Speech Processor

Abstract

The purpose of this study was 1) to describe the relationship between electrically evoked auditory brain stem response (EABR) thresholds and the behavioral measures needed to program the speech processor of the CLARION® Multi-Strategy™ Cochlear Implant, and 2) to determine whether the relationship between EABR threshold and the behavioral levels used to program the Clarion device was correlated with the temporal integration abilities of these subjects. The EABR thresholds, psychophysical thresholds, and the Clarion speech processor programming levels were recorded from 29 postlingually deafened adults. The mean EABR thresholds approximated most comfortable levels (M levels) for the programming stimulus. However, intrasubject variability was substantial. Significant intrasubject variability in temporal integration also was observed. Correlations were found between the ability of a cochlear implant user to perform temporal integration and the relationship between his or her EABR threshold and the threshold for the programming stimulus.

Keywords

auditory evoked potential cochlear implant electrical stimulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fryauf-Bertschy

Tyler

Kelsay

Gantz

Woodworth

. Cochlear implant use by prelingually deafened children: the influences of age of implant and length of device use. J Speech Hear Res 1997; 40: 183–99.

Miyamoto

Svirsky

Robbins

. Enhancement of expressive language in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997; 117: 154–7.

Tyler

Fryauf-Bertschy

Kelsay

DMR

Gantz

Woodworth

Parkinson

. Speech perception by prelingually deaf children using cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117: 180–7.

Osberger

. Cochlear implantation in children under the age of two years: candidacy consideration. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117: 145–9.

Hall

. Handbook of auditory evoked responses. Boston, Mass: Allyn and Bacon, 1990.

Brown

Abbas

Frayauf-Bertschy

Kelsay

Gantz

. Intraoperative and postoperative electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses in Nucleus cochlear implant users: implications for the fitting process. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 168–76.

Shallop

Beiter

Goin

Mischke

. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABR) and middle latency responses (EMLR) obtained from patients with the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 5–15.

Shallop

VanDyke

Goin

Mischke

. Prediction of behavioral threshold and comfort values for Nucleus 22-channel implant patients from electrical auditory brain stem response test results. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991; 100: 896–8.

Kileny

. Use of electrophysiologic measures in the management of children with cochlear implants: brainstem, middle latency, and cognitive (P300) responses. Am J Otol 1991; 12(Suppl 12): 37–42.

10.

Mason

Sheppard

Garnham

Lutman

O'Donoghue

Gibbin

. Improving the relationship of intraoperative EABR thresholds to T-level in young children receiving the Nucleus cochlear implant. In: Advances in cochlear implants. Proceedings of the 3rd International Cochlear Implant Conference, Innsbruck, Austria, 1994: 44–9.

11.

Abbas

Brown

. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem response: growth of response with current level. Hear Res 1991; 51: 123–37.