The geometric structure of the cricothyroid (CT) muscle and thyroarytenoid (TA) muscle was quantified in 6 human and 3 canine larynges. Each muscle was divided into a series of fiber bundles. With a 3-dimensional micrometer probe, the coordinates of the origin and insertion of each bundle were measured before dissection. It was found that the mass of the CT muscle in the dog was 1.463 ± 0.280 g, which was significantly greater than the 0.9423 ±0.123 g found in the human. This was a result of the cross-sectional area of the canine CT muscle being 105.3 ± 11.6 mm2 instead of the 73.8 ± 7.4 mm2 found for the human. However, the ratios of CT/TA mass and cross-sectional area between the two groups were not significantly different, suggesting that the two muscles grow proportionally.
TitzeIR. Phonation threshold pressure: a missing link in glottal aerodynamics. J Acoust Soc Am1992; 91: 2926–35.
2.
Faaborg-AndersenK. Electromyographic investigation of intrinsic laryngeal muscles in humans. Acta Physiol ScandSuppl1957; 41(Suppl 140).
3.
HiranoMVennardWOhalaJ. The function of laryngeal muscles in regulating fundamental frequency and intensity of phonation. J Speech Hear Res1969; 12: 616–28.
4.
TitzeIRLuscheiESHiranoM. Role of the thyroarytenoid muscle in regulation of fundamental frequency. J Voice1989; 3: 213–24.
5.
LarsonCRKempsterGB. Voice fundamental frequency changes following discharge of laryngeal motor units. In: TitzeIRSchererRC, eds. Vocal fold physiology: biomechanics, acoustics, and phonatory control. Denver, Colo: The Denver Center for the Performing Arts, 1983: 91–104.
6.
HiranoM. Morphological structure of the vocal cord as a vibrator and its variations. Folia Phoniatr (Basel)1976; 26: 89–94.
7.
RubinH. Experimental studies on vocal pitch and intensity in phonation. Laryngoscope1963; 73: 973–1015.
8.
MooreDMBerkeGS. The effect of laryngeal nerve stimulation on phonation: a glottographic study using an in vivo canine model. J Acoust Soc Am1988; 83: 705–15.
9.
ChoiH-SBerkeGSYeMKreimanJ. Function of the thyroarytenoid muscle in a canine laryngeal model. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1993; 102: 769–76.
10.
ArnoldGE. Physiology and pathology of the cricothyroid muscle. Laryngoscope1961; 71: 687–753.
11.
Alipour-HaghighiFPerlmanALTitzeIR. Tetanic response of the cricothyroid muscle. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1991; 100: 626–31.
12.
KempsterGLarsonCKistlerM. Effects of electrical stimulation of cricoarytenoid and thyroid muscles on fundamental frequency. J Voice1988; 2: 221–9.
13.
NegusBE. The comparative anatomy and physiology of the larynx. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton, 1949.
14.
SiegelS. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1956.
15.
HiranoMKuritaSNagataK. Growth, development and aging of human vocal folds. In: BlessDMAbbsJH, eds. Vocal fold physiology. San Diego, Calif: College-Hill Press, 1983: 22–43.
SonninenA. The role of the external laryngeal muscles in length-adjustment of the vocal cords in singing. Acta Otolaryngol [Suppl] (Stockh) 1956(suppl 130).
18.
StoneRENuttallAL. Relative movements of the thyroid and cricoid cartilages assessed by neural stimulation in dogs. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1974; 78: 135–40.
19.
HollienH. In search of vocal frequency control mechanisms. In: BlessDMAbbsJH, eds. Vocal fold physiology. San Diego, Calif: College-Hill Press, 1983: 361–7.
20.
VilkmanE. An apparatus for studying the role of the cricothyroid articulation in the voice production of excised human larynges. Folia Phoniatr (Basel)1987; 39: 167–77.
21.
ZaretskyLSSandersI. The three bellies of the canine cricothyroid muscle. Ann Otol Rhinol LaryngolSuppl1992; 101(Suppl 156).
22.
PressmanJKelemenG. Physiology of the larynx. Arch Otolaryngol1955; 35: 506–54.
