FrelingNJMolenaarWMVermeyA. Malignant parotid tumors: clinical use of MR imaging and histologic correlation. Radiology1992; 185: 691–6.
9.
SteinerETuretschekKWunderbaldingerP. Imaging in parotid tumors: US versus MRT. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr1994; 160: 397–405.
10.
ThibaultFHalimiPBelyN. Internal architecture of the parotid gland at MR imaging: facial nerve or ductal system?Radiology1993; 188: 701–4.
11.
TeresiLMKolinELufkinRBHanafeeWN. MR imaging of the intraparotid facial nerve: normal anatomy and pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol1987; 148: 995–1000.
12.
BuckenhamTMGeorgeCDMcVicarDMoodyARColesGS. Digital sialography: imaging and intervention. Br J Radiol1994, 67: 524–9.
13.
SchratterMSteinerEImhofH. Conventional roentgen diagnosis of the salivary glands. Still of clinical value or traditional care? Radiologe1994; 34: 248–53.
14.
YuneHYKlatteEC. Current status of sialography. AJR Am J Roentgenol1972; 115: 420–8.
15.
KrugBFriedmannGSteinbrichWLönneckenI. Vergleich der digitalen Lumineszensradiographie (DLR) und der konventionellen Röntgendiagnostik bei Sialographien. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr1989; 150: 718–22.
16.
LandwehrPHohmannDKraheTLacknerK. Wertigkeit der digitalen Subtraktionssialographie im Vergleich mit der konventionellen Sialographie, Speicheldrüsensonographie und Operationsbefund. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr1992; 156: 437–42.
17.
RinastEGmelinEHollands-ThornB. Digital subtraction sialography, conventional sialography, high-resolution ultrasonography and computed tomography in the diagnosis of salivary gland diseases. Eur J Radiol1989; 9: 224–30.
CockrellDJRoutPG. An adverse reaction following sialography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol1993; 22: 41–2.
20.
KreßESchulzH-GNeumannTH. Diagnostic imaging in diseases of the major salivary glands using sonography, sialography and CT-sialography — comparison of methods. HNO1993; 41: 345–51.
