Comparison of Aerodynamic and Electroglottographic Parameters in Evaluating Clinically Relevant Voicing Patterns

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to identify one or more aerodynamic or electroglottographic measures that distinguish among voicing patterns that are clinically relevant for nodule pathogenesis and regression: a presumably pathogenic pattern (pressed voice), a neutral pattern (normal voice), and two presumably therapeutic patterns (resonant voice and breathy voice). Trained subjects with normal voices produced several tokens of each voice type on sustained vowels /a/, /i/, and /u/. For each token, maximum flow declination rate, alternating current flow, and minimum flow were obtained from inverse-filtered airflow signals, and closed quotient and closing time were obtained from electroglottographic signals. The results indicate that for /a/ and /i/ (but not for /u/), the closed quotient provides a sensitive tool for distinguishing the voice types in physiologically interpretable directions. Further, post-hoc analyses confirmed a direct relationship between the closed quotient and videoscopic ratings of laryngeal adduction, which previous work links to nodule pathogenesis and regression.

Keywords

aerodynamic measures electroglottography vocal nodule voice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Epstein

Winston

Friedmann

Ormerod

. The vocal cord polyp. J Laryngol Otol 1957;71: 673–88.

Gillman

. Treatise on collagen. In: Gould

, ed. Biology of collagen. Vol2. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1968: 334.

Sonninen

Damste

Jol

Fokkens

. On vocal strain. Folia Phoniatr (Basel) 1972;24: 321–36.

Kleinsasser

. Pathogenesis of vocal cord polyps. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982;91: 378–81.

Hillman

Holmberg

Perkell

Walsh

Vaughn

. Objective assessment of vocal fold hyperfunction: an experimental framework and initial results. J Speech Hear Res 1989; 32: 373–92.

Jiang

. A methodological study of hemilaryngeal phonation and the measurement of vocal fold intraglottal pressure and impact stress [Dissertation]. Iowa City, Iowa: The University of Iowa, 1991.

Boone

. The voice and voice therapy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977.

Colton

Casper

. Understanding voice problems: a physiological perspective for diagnosis and treatment. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins, 1990.

Cooper

. Modern techniques of vocal rehabilitation. Springfield, Ill: Charles C Thomas, 1973.

10.

Fog

Pedersen M

. Electroglottography compared with synchronized stroboscopy in normal persons. Folia Phoniatr (Basel) 1977;29: 191–9.

11.

Childers

Krishnamurthy

. A critical review of electroglottography. CRC Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1985;12: 131–61.

12.

Childers

Hicks

Moore

Alsaka

. A model for vocal fold vibratory motion, contact area, and the electro-glottogram. J Acoust Soc Am 1986;80: 1309–20.

13.

Scherer

Druker

Titze

. Electroglottography and direct measurement of vocal fold contact area. In: Fujimura

, ed. Vocal physiology: voice production, mechanisms and functions. New York, NY: Raven Press, 1988: 279–91.

14.

Scherer

Gould

Titze

Meyers

Sataloff

. Preliminary evaluation of selected acoustic and glottographic measures for clinical phonatory function analysis. J Voice 1988; 2: 230–44.

15.

Rothenberg

Mahshie

. Monitoring vocal fold abduction through vocal fold contact area. J Speech Hear Res 1988; 31: 338–51.

16.

Holmberg

Hillman

Perkell

. Glottal airflow and transglottal air pressure measurements for male and female speakers in soft, normal, and loud voice. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 511–29.

17.

Colton

Conture

. Problems and pitfalls of electroglottography. J Voice 1990;4: 10–24.

18.

Sundberg

Scherer

Titze

. Phonatory control in male singing. A study of the effects of subglottal pressure, fundamental frequency, and mode of phonation on the voice source. J Voice 1993;7: 15–29.

19.

Scherer

Vail

. Measures of laryngeal adduction. J Acoust Soc Am 1988;84(Suppl 1).

20.

Gauffin

Sundberg

. Spectral correlates of glottal voice source waveform characteristics. J Speech Hear Res 1989;32: 556–65.